Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Dear all,

Is there any possible way to construct a set $A \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n $ for which $ H^{n-1} (\partial A) > Leb^ + (A ) $?

Where $ H^{n-1} (\partial A) $ is the Hausdorff measure of the boundary of $A$ and: $ Leb^{+} (A) = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0 } \frac{ Leb(A_ \epsilon) - Leb(A) }{\epsilon} $ , $A_\epsilon := \{ x \in \mathbb{R} ^n | d(x,A) \leq \epsilon \} $ =Minkowski's content with respect to Lebesgue measure.

Thanks in advance !

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

So, $A$ is just a "set"? Say $A$ is an open square minus a mid-line: $$ A = \{ (x,y): 0 \lt x \lt 1 \text{ and (} 0 \lt y \lt 1/2 \text{ or } 1/2 \lt y \lt 1\text{)}\} $$ Then $\partial A$ consists of 5 line-segments of length $1$ (the 4 sides and the mid-line), so $H^1(\partial A) = 5$. But $\mathrm{Leb}^+(A) = 4$, missing the mid-line.

share|improve this answer
Thanks a lot ! The problem is that I can't understand the calculation of such thing: By definition : $H^1 ( \partial A) = lim _{\delta \to 0} inf \{ \sum C diam(U_i) | \partial A \subseteq \cup U_i , diam(U_i ) \leq \delta \} $ Can you please detail a bit about how you deduced that $H^1 (\partial A) = 5$ in this case? Thanks a lot @! –  Jason Mraz Jul 12 '12 at 20:18
First: For a line segment of length $a$, the one-dimensional Hausdorff measure is $a$. Hausdorff measure is additive on Borel sets, so the measure for the 5-segment set is $5$. –  Gerald Edgar Jul 12 '12 at 21:13
add comment

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.