Welcome to MathOverflow

Question

2

Suppose $A$ is a $n \times m$ matrix and $B$ is a $m \times n$ matrix. Then it is known that $det(I_{n}+AB)=det(I_{m}+BA)$.

Is there an analogous identity of the form $det(P_{1}+AB)=det(P_{2}+BA)$, where $P_{1},P_{2}$ are positive definite? Or something like it?

flag	asked Jul 5 at 12:59 Felix Goldberg 2,385●5●12

Do you have a reference for "it is known that"? – Igor Rivin Jul 5 at 13:21

This clearly can't be true as stated, if you take $A = B = I_n$ and $P_1 = \lambda I_n$ and $P_2 = \mu I_n$ for two distinct positive numbers $\lambda, \mu$. I don't know if there's something similar. I assume you are working over the field $\mathbb R$. Perhaps your best bet is to diagonalize $P_1$ and $P_2$ and try the explicit formula for the determinant in terms of permutations...? – Spiro Karigiannis Jul 5 at 13:23

3

@Igor. See Exercise 14, Chapter 3 of my book Matrices, Springer-Verlag GTM**216*. More generally, one has $$X^m\det(XI_n-AB)=X^n\det(XI_m-BA).$$ – Denis Serre Jul 5 at 13:30

@Denis: thanks! – Igor Rivin Jul 5 at 13:51

Robert Israel · Accepted Answer · 2012-07-05 21:56:51Z UTC

Given $P$, $\det(P+AB)$ does not depend only on $BA$. For example, take $n=m=2$, $P = \pmatrix{2 & 0\cr 0 & 1\cr}$, $A = \pmatrix{1 & t\cr 0 & 1\cr}$, $B = \pmatrix{0 & 1\cr 1 & -t\cr}$. Then $\det(P + AB) = 1 - t$ depends on $t$, but $BA = \pmatrix{0 & 1\cr 1 & 0\cr}$ doesn't depend on $t$. So any $P_2$ such that $\det(P+AB) = \det(P_2+BA)$ must depend on $t$.

Federico Poloni · Answer 2 · 2012-07-05 18:12:37Z UTC

0

Is this what you are looking for? $$ \det(P+AB)=\det(P)\det(I+P^{-1}AB)=\det P \det(I+BP^{-1}A)$$

Edit: the chain of equalities once ended with $=\det(P+PBP^{-1}A)$, but this only works when all matrices are square.

edited Jul 5 at 18:12

answered Jul 5 at 13:39

Federico Poloni
4,400●1●12●25

Well, not quite.. but it's a nice one. – Felix Goldberg Jul 5 at 14:22

1

$B$ is not a square matrix, so you can't conjugate it by anything. – Will Sawin Jul 5 at 15:36

@WillSawin: you are right, the last equality does not hold unless $A$ and $B$ are square. But maybe the second-to-last equality (which is basically the Schur complement formula) is a nice enough expression. – Federico Poloni Jul 5 at 17:41

determinantal identity sought

Remember to vote up questions/answers you find interesting or helpful (requires 15 reputation points)

2 Answers

You can accept an answer to one of your own questions by clicking the check mark next to it. This awards 15 reputation points to the person who answered and 2 reputation points to you.