Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I assume ZFC.

Let $U$ a set with the following (1), (2), (3):

1) $\omega\in U$

2) $x\in U\ \Rightarrow x\subset U$

3) $x\in U\ \Rightarrow \mathcal{P}(x)\in U$ (where $\mathcal{P}(x):=${$y| y\subset x$})

Then by these premises, I wish prove that $(4)\Leftrightarrow (4')$ where:

4) if $x\subset U$ and $|x|<|U|$ then $x\in U$ (where $|a|$ is the cardinality of the set $a$)

4') If $f: a\to U$ is function and $a\in U$ then $\bigcup_{s\in a}f(s)\in U$ .

The Book of Monk "Introduction to set theory' claim this equivalence as a exercise.

and the implication $(4)\Rightarrow (4')$ is immediate from the book above..

I tried to prove by induction that $|U|\subset U$, or tried to generalize the Mostowsky theorem for get a inijection $|U|\to U$ which preserves the relation '$\in $' (unsuccessfully). I have see also some posts here about this problem, but I hope exist a (relatively) simple answere..

THen I ask: How to prove $(4')\Rightarrow (4)$ ?

share|improve this question
    
Why are you trying to prove $|U| \subset U$? –  David Roberts Jul 4 '12 at 23:45
    
Property 4 appears not to follow. Assume GCH; then $U:=V_{\aleph_\omega}$ satisfies (1)-(3), but the set $\{\aleph_n: n\in\omega\}$ is a set with cardinality $<\vert U\vert$ but not in $U$. Is there more to the exercise? –  Noah S Jul 5 '12 at 2:24
    
This also provides a counterexample to 4'. –  Noah S Jul 5 '12 at 2:25
    
A simpler counterexample to (4) and (4') is $V_{\omega+\omega}$. But the question is not to infer (4) and/or (4') from (1,2,3) but rather to infer that (4) is equivalent to (4'). –  Andreas Blass Jul 5 '12 at 4:27
    
David ROberts: From $|U|\subset U$ if $|x|<|U|$ i.e. $|x|\in |U|$ follow $|x|\in U$ and from (4') follow $x\in U$. –  Buschi Sergio Jul 5 '12 at 5:29

1 Answer 1

I don't see a really slick proof, so here's a rough (and fairly standard) one. Assume that $U$ satisfies (1,2,3,4'). Notice that, by (2) and (3), $U$ is closed under subsets, so the cardinalities of elements of $U$ form an initial segment of the cardinal numbers; let $\kappa$ be the smallest cardinal not in this initial segment. It follows from (1) that $\kappa$ is uncountable, from (3) that whenever $\mu<\kappa$ then $2^\mu<\kappa$, and from (4') that $\kappa$ is a regular cardinal. So $\kappa$ is strongly inaccessible. If $U$ contained any sets of rank $\geq\kappa$, then the lowest-rank such sets would, by (2), have rank exactly $\kappa$; but this is impossible, because (by regularity of $\kappa$) any set of rank exactly $\kappa$ must have cardinality at least $\kappa$. The conclusion, therefore, is that all sets in $U$ have rank $<\kappa$. With the usual notation for the levels of the cumulative hierarchy, we have $U\subseteq V_\kappa$.

Next, notice that for all $\alpha<\kappa$, $V_\alpha$ has cardinality $<\kappa$. (This is proved by induction on $\alpha$, using at successor stages that $\mu<\kappa$ implies $2^\mu<\kappa$, and using at limit stages that $\kappa$ is regular and uncountable.) Therefore, $V_\kappa$, being the union of $\kappa$ sets $V_\alpha$ each smaller than $\kappa$, has cardinality only $\kappa$. In view of the result in the preceding paragraph, we have $|U|\leq \kappa$.

This means that, if $x$ is as in the statement (4) that we want to prove, then $|x|<\kappa$, and therefore there exists some $a\in U$ with $|a|=|x|$. Fix such an $a$ and fix a bijection $f:a\to x$. Applying (4'), we find that the union $y$ of all the members of $x$ is an element of $U$. But each member of $x$ is a subset of $y$ and therefore an element of the power set of $y$. So we have $x\subseteq\mathcal P(y)$ and, by (3), $\mathcal P(y)\in U$. We already noted above that $U$ is closed under subsets, so it follows that $x\in U$, as desired.

share|improve this answer
    
Infinite thank's Prof. Andreas Blass. –  Buschi Sergio Jul 5 '12 at 5:35

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.