Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

We want to find the reference book for some version of the schur's lemma which covers the following result

Let A be an assoiative algebra over {\mathbb C} with countable basis, then any central element acts on any simple A-module as a scalar.

Thanks

share|improve this question
    
Why is it relevant that the algebra has a countable basis? –  André Henriques Jun 25 '12 at 18:58
2  
@André: Take $A = M = \mathbb{C}(x)$. Every element is central, but only a few act as scalars! –  Evan Jenkins Jun 25 '12 at 19:32
    
I'd bet it must be also in Dixmier's Universal eneveloping algebras. –  Vít Tuček Jun 27 '12 at 12:52
add comment

4 Answers

up vote 4 down vote accepted

This is (an immediate consequence of) Lemma 2.1.3(b) in Chriss-Ginzburg.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Doc, if you want to be anal with your references, you should quote Amitsur, A. S. Algebras over infinite fields. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 7 (1956), 35–48.

Otherwise, this is a well-known fact and you can just refer to it as "Amitsur's Trick" or "Noncommutative Nullstellensatz". Chapter 9 of McConnell-Robson-Noncommutative-Noetherian-Rings is devoted entirely to this property and its finer variations.

share|improve this answer
add comment

From Wikipedia:

  • David S. Dummit, Richard M. Foote. Abstract Algebra. 2nd ed., pg. 337.
  • Lam, Tsit-Yuen (2001), A First Course in Noncommutative Rings, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-95325-0

From Google Books:

  • William Fulton, Joe Harris. Representation Theory.
  • William Arveson. An Invitation to C*-Algebras.

I hope that helps you a bit.

P.s: I wanted to post this in a comment, but the comment button isn't available for some reason.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks, i only have the book of Lam in hand. However i don't find it yet. –  r_l Jun 25 '12 at 19:11
    
Johan, just so you know, you need at least 50 reputation in order to leave comments on posts that are not your own. I imagine you will get there pretty soon, though! –  B R Jun 25 '12 at 19:27
    
@BR Aha! Well, You are right. I just passed that limit (-; –  jmc Jun 25 '12 at 19:38
add comment

This is also in Bourbaki's Algebra 8 (most recent edition), Section 3, number 2, Example, page 43. This reference is online if you have access to SpringerLink.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.