Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

(everything below is defined over an algebraically closed field)

Let $D$ be a (smooth) surface, and let $X \subset T \times D$ be a flat family of curves on $D$, where $T$ is irreducible. Let $E$ be a curve on $D$. Fix some $t_0 \in T$ such that $X_{t_0}$ does not contain $E$, the intersection $X_{t_0} \times_D E$ is some not necessarily reduced closed subscheme of $D$ of dimension 0.

Is it true then that there exists an open dense subset $U \subset T$, such that $X_t \times_D E$ are all isomorphic for different $t \in U$? Does one actually need to assume $D$ to be projective? smooth? Is the previous statement true for an affine $D$?

share|improve this question
I don't understand the role played by $E$ here. Given a family of curves, can't you always choose an $E$ and a $t_0$ so that your hypothesis is satisfied ? Also, consider the moduli space ($=T$) of elliptic curves with a linear rigidification; above $T$ you have a family of elliptic curves ($=X$) and an embedding $X\to T\times{\bf P}^2$, where $D={\bf P}^2$, given by the Weierstras equations. Clearly, there is no open subset of $T$ above which all the fibres are geometrically isomorphic. This seems to show that the answer to your question is no. –  Damian Rössler Jun 24 '12 at 15:18
Sorry I just realized that I completely misunderstood you question. Forget my comment. –  Damian Rössler Jun 24 '12 at 15:40

2 Answers 2

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Probable counterexample: take $D=\mathbb{A}^2$ (or $\mathbb{P}^2$, if you prefer), $T=\mathbb{A}^1$, and let $X_t$ be the union of the four lines $x=0$, $y=0$, $x=y$, and $x=ty$. It is well known that $t$ is "almost" determined by the isomorphism class of $D_t$, as the cross-ratio of the four tangents at the origin. ("Almost" refers to permutations of the four lines, but only finitely many $t$'s give rise to isomorphic $D_t$'s). My claim is that this remains true if you replace $D_t$ by a sufficiently big infinitesimal neighbourhood of the origin (presumably the one given by the ideal $(x,y)^5$ works).

Assuming this, you have a counterexample as soon as $E$ contains the neighbourhood in question, i.e. is sufficiently singular at the origin.

share|improve this answer
Thank you, this answers my question. –  Dima Sustretov Jun 25 '12 at 17:16

Let me just flesh out Laurent's answer. $X_t$ is the vanishing set of $f_t=xy(x-y)(x-ty)$, an equation of degree $4$. Let $g$ be any homogeneous polynomial of degree $5$, and let $E$ be the vanishing set of $G$. Then the intersection of $E$ and $X_t$ has a unique singular point, the origin, whose maximal ideal is $(x,y)$. Thus, the local ring at the origin, modulo the fifth power of the maximal ideal, is determined by the isomorphism class of the intersection.

This local ring is $k[x,y]/(f_t,x^5,x^4y,x^3y^2,x^2y^3,xy^4,y^5)$. There is a unique-up-to-scaling degree $4$ homogeneous polynomial on the Zariski tangent space that vanishes in this ring, and that polynomial is $f_i$. Degree-$4$ homogenous determine $4$-point subsets of $\mathbb P^1$ determine elliptic curves. The $j$-invariant of that curve is a nonconstant function of $t$ and is determined solely by the isomorphism type of the intersection.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.