5
$\begingroup$

Suppose $A$ is an $n\times n$ stochastic matrix, that is, entrywise nonnegative and row sums are all $1$. If $A$ is invertible, is it true that the minimum diagonal entry of $A^{-1}$ is no larger than $1$?

Small matrices support this claim, but for larger ones, I don't know how to (dis)prove it.

Edited I forgot to add the condition that the diagonal entries of $A$ are all zero.

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

8
$\begingroup$

Here's a counterexample: $$ A = \frac{1}{5} \left[ \matrix{ 0 & 1 & 3 & 1 \cr 2 & 0 & 1 & 2 \cr 3 & 1 & 0 & 1 \cr 0 & 3 & 2 & 0}\right], \quad A^{-1}= \frac{1}{3} \left[ \matrix{ 7 & -9 & 11 & -6 \cr -8 & 6 & -4 & 9 \cr 12 & -9 & 6 & -6 \cr -13 & 21 & -14 &9} \right]. $$

$\endgroup$
0
8
$\begingroup$

Try $$A = \pmatrix{1/2 & 1/2\cr 1/2 - s & 1/2 + s\cr},\ A^{-1} = \pmatrix{1 + 1/(2s) & -1/(2s)\cr 1 - 1/(2s) & 1/(2s)\cr} $$ where the minimum diagonal entry of $A^{-1}$ goes to $+\infty$ as $s \to 0+$.

EDIT: with your added condition, try $$A = \pmatrix{ 0&0&1/2&1/2\cr s &0&1/2-2s&1/2+s\cr 1/2&1/2&0&0\cr 1/2-2s &1/2+s&s&0\cr}$$ $$ A^{-1} = \pmatrix{ 1/(8{s})+1/4&-1/(8{s})&3/(8{s})+3/4&-3/(8{s})\cr -1/(8{s})-1/4&1/(8{ s})&5/4-3/(8{s})&3/(8{s})\cr 3/(8{s})+3/4&-3/(8{s})&1/(8{s})+1/4&-1/(8{s}) \cr5/4-3/(8{s})&3/(8{s})&-1/(8{s})-1/ 4&1/(8{s})\cr}$$

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ +1: I forgot to add the key condition, otherwise I know it is false. $\endgroup$
    – Betrand
    Jun 20, 2012 at 20:59
  • $\begingroup$ Very nice, your example shows "it is unbounded". $\endgroup$
    – Betrand
    Jun 21, 2012 at 15:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.