0
$\begingroup$

Let $R$ be an artinian commutative ring and $A$ an algebra over $R$ with basis $\{a_1, a_2, \ldots , a_n\}$ where each $a_i$ is a unit and

$a_ia_j=u_{ij}a_ja_i,$

where each $u_{ij}\in R$ and is a unit. is true that for every element $x\in A$ the left annihilator of $x$ denoted by $ann_l\{x\}$ equals the right annhilator $ann_r\{x\}$?

I think that if exist an element $z$ with $ann_l{z}\neq ann_r{z}$, this lack of symmetry must necessarily be reflected in the ring $R$ or in the elements of the base. Since, for the ring $R$ and for the elements of the base there is symmetry, this symmetry extends to all elements of $A$. This is my perception, but how to prove?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

It is false. The ring of two-by-two matrices has such a basis:

$$a_1=\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix},a_2=\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix},a_3=\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix},a_4=\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ -1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}$$

with $u_{ij}=\pm 1$. (The $a_i$ lie in a representation of the group D_4, so $a_ia_ja_i^{-1}a_j^{-1}$ is central, thus is $\pm 1$.) But this ring obviously fails to satisfy the annihilator property.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you. It is a nice example to prove that we have not $ann_l x=ann_rs$. But, probably, their cardinality is the same. I'm trying to find a proof of this. $\endgroup$
    – Miguel
    Jun 13, 2012 at 18:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.