0
$\begingroup$

Dear Mathoverflow'ers,

I am interested in the following equation:

$-\Delta u = u^{p-1} + \lambda u$ in $ \Omega$ with $ u=0 $ on $ \partial \Omega$.

1) My question is related to the Brezis-Nirenberg result from 1983 which states (and I am probably slightly off here) that when $ p=2^*$ (the critical Sobolev exponent) that there is a positive solution for certain values of $ \lambda$ and they can give an optimal range of $ \lambda$ (in certain cases) where one has a positive solution.

2) I believe that at the time it was very suprising that the addition of this linear term could restore compactness in the critical imbedding and recover a positive solution.

3) In another direction one can use some abstract bifurcation theory (i believe it would be the results of Crandall-Rabinowitz from the mid seventies) to show there is a positive solution for any value of $ p>2$ (as large as one likes) provided $ \lambda$ was sufficiently close (and to the left) of the first eigenvalue of $ -\Delta$.

My question is that since 3) was already well known why was 1) so suprising?
I realize that this is somewhat of an ill formed question and may not be suitable for mathoverflow.

thanks Greg

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

There are several reasons why the work of Brezis-Nirenberg was surprising.

  1. First, it goes beyond a small range of $\lambda$'s that one would obtain from bifurcation theory.

  2. The existence of positive solutions is highly dependent on the geometry and topology of $\Omega$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Hi Liviu, I kinda suspected that 1 was the reason but wasn't quite sure. Thanks for the quick responce. $\endgroup$
    – greg
    Jan 7, 2012 at 1:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.