4
$\begingroup$

I have a few questions regarding the current status of research on algebraic dynamics over separated schemes. In what follows $\varphi:X\rightarrow X$ will be a finite self-morphism of a noetherian separated scheme. By looking at literature it appears to me that in most of the work done in the field of algebraic dynamics $X$ is assumed to be a variety over a field, often a projective variety over a field. This makes sense because algebraic dynamics is motivated by its arithmetical applications.

Q1 Have dynamical systems $(X,\varphi)$ been studied when $X$ is NOT a variety over a field (in particular, not a projective variety over a field)?

When $X$ is a projective variety over an algebraically closed field $k$, the scheme of fixed points of $\varphi$ is defined as the set of points in $X(k)$ that are fixed by $\varphi$.

Q2 Is there a definition of the scheme of fixed points of $\varphi$ when $X$ is NOT a variety over a field (in particular, not a projective variety over a field)? It appears that it must be defined as the equalizer of $\varphi$ and identity, but I cannot find this in the literature.

Q3 Assuming the answer to Q1 is yes, are there any known results about number of fixed points of $\varphi$ (e.g. finiteness results) when $X$ is NOT a variety over a field (in particular, not a projective variety over a field)?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ For Q2, the answer is yes. If you don't like equalizers, you may take the scheme-theoretic intersection of the graph of $\phi$ with the diagonal. BCnrd gives a sheaf-theoretic definition of fixed locus in mathoverflow.net/questions/3190/… $\endgroup$
    – S. Carnahan
    Dec 19, 2011 at 2:22
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! I do like equalizers! Just couldn't find this definition of fixed points in the literature, and was a bit surprised by that. $\endgroup$ Dec 19, 2011 at 2:58

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.