0
$\begingroup$

I am a mathematical physicist and I am studying certain discrete dynamical systems defined in terms of piecewise linear mappings, which may be expressed in terms of expressions over the max-plus semi-field.

In the study of the points of non-differentiability of these piecewise linear mappings, I was wondering, is there an established proof that (in n-dimensions) every set of points of non-differentiability of a piecewise linear mapping (with rational slopes) may be expressed as the image of a variety over a non-archimedean valuation field under the endowed valuation?

Is there some, possibly constructive proof, with some sort of standard construction?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Could you name your spaces, so I can understand what you are asking? Right now, it looks like you start with a PL map from $\mathbb{R}^n$ to itself, and are considering the subspace $X$ of the domain on which the map is non-differentiable. Am I correct that you want to know if $X$ is the image under the valuation map of some variety in $\mathbb{A}^n_K$, where $K$ is a field endowed with a nonarchimedean real valuation? $\endgroup$
    – S. Carnahan
    Oct 19, 2010 at 3:35
  • $\begingroup$ Indeed, you are correct. I have $X \subset \mathbb{R}^n$ which is the set of points in which a PL mapping, $f : \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}^m$, is not differentiable. One may replace $\mathbb{R}$ with $S = (\mathbb{R} \cup \{\infty\}, \max, + )$. Now, the field that seems popular would be letting $\mathbb{K}$ be the set of algebraic functions (with usual index map). Not being an expert in the field, I would like to know if it has been established that $X$ is the image variety over $\mathbb{A}_{\mathbb{K}}^n$. Is there, for example, a standard construction of an underlying ideal? $\endgroup$ Oct 22, 2010 at 1:04
  • $\begingroup$ I would say that the corner locus of your map is the union of corner loci for the restriction to each coordinate of $R^m$. Therefore it is just a union of tropical varieties. $\endgroup$ Aug 5, 2017 at 20:52

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.