7
$\begingroup$

I am trying to find some data structures/mathemetical theories to represent causal relationships which differ from graphical models or Bayesian Networks. Any ideas?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ There may be some usefule information found at an earlier question (which generated quite a bit of debate): mathoverflow.net/questions/22490/… $\endgroup$ Jun 15, 2010 at 11:52
  • $\begingroup$ I would say that most of it can be cast in terms of adapted filtrations. $\endgroup$ Jan 7, 2014 at 21:20

3 Answers 3

4
$\begingroup$

The standard account of causality is Lewis's theory of counterfactuals. He wrote a small, very readable book called Counterfactuals, which the SEP summarizes here. The idea is to take the viewpoint of modal logic, and interpret the counterfactual conditional $A \;\boxdot\!\!\!\to B$ (read "if A were the case, then B would be the case") as holding if $B$ holds in the nearest world in which $A$ holds. Obviously this requires enriching modal logic with a notion of similarity of worlds, as well.

A lot of other people have worked on this subject; personally I am most fond of McCain-Turner causality, since Graham White has given it a nice proof-theoretic formulation.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I wouldn't say there's a single standard account of causality. For a discussion of further accounts - mechanistic, probabilistic, agency - try kent.ac.uk/secl/philosophy/jw/2004/causality.pdf. $\endgroup$ Jun 15, 2010 at 9:00
  • $\begingroup$ That's a fair point -- I meant "standard" in the sense of "the one everyone feels obliged to argue with", rather than "the one everyone accepts". $\endgroup$ Jun 15, 2010 at 9:41
2
$\begingroup$

With several variables connected by asymmetric causal relations, it's not so likely that a mathematical theory of causality will escape graphical representation. Neel mentioned above Lewis's counterfactual analysis, and this has a close affinity with aspects of Judea Pearl's work on casual Bayesian networks, see p. 239 of http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=wnGU_TsW3BQC.

Among quantitative approaches, a variant on the usual statistical approach is Janzing and Schoelkopf's use of algorithmic dependence to determine causal relations: http://www.kyb.mpg.de/publications/attachments/paper_IEEE_version3_webseite_6526%5B1%5D.pdf.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Burks, A.W. (1977), Chance, Cause, Reason : An Inquiry into the Nature of Scientific Evidence, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.