2
$\begingroup$

Let $m,n$ be positive integers, and $\displaystyle \Phi_{m,n}~:~ {\mathbb{R}_+^*}^m \to \mathbb{R}_+^*, \ \ \ (x_1,x_2, \ldots , x_m) \mapsto \sum_{k=1}^m \sqrt[n]{x_k}$.

Clearly for $m=1$ if for all positive integer $n$, we have $\Phi_{1,n}(x) \in \mathbb Q$, then $x=1$.

It seems that the same conclusion holds for $m>1$ (or at least the subset of ${\mathbb{R}_+^*}^m$ for which $\Phi_{m,n}(x) \in \mathbb Q$ is finite).

Is it true (or even obvious and I missed it)?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ How does your definition of Phi depend on n? $\endgroup$ May 8, 2010 at 21:16
  • $\begingroup$ @Kevin: Those are n-th roots. $\endgroup$
    – JBL
    May 8, 2010 at 21:58

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

The following conclusion is true: If $\Phi_{m,n}(x)\in\mathbb{Q}$ for all positive integers n, then x1=x2=...=xn=1.

It follows in what I believe is a fairly routine, or at least not too difficult, manner from the following Claim:

Let K be the extension field of ℚ generated by all n-th roots of all xi. Then K is a finite extension of ℚ.

Proof. Let yi be the N!-th root of xi. Then the power sum symmetric functions of the yi are all rational, hence the elementary symmetric functions are all rational, so the y's lie in a field extension of ℚ of degree at most m. Take N as large as you like. Voila!

$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.