3
$\begingroup$

Suppose a countable discrete group is acting on a smooth manifold with finite stabilizers and the orbit space is compact (and Hausdorff). How one can prove that the action is proper?

I found this statement in a paper of Luck-Rosenberg and would be happy to use it as a criterion:

  • MR2048727 Lück, Wolfgang; Rosenberg, Jonathan The equivariant Lefschetz fixed point theorem for proper cocompact G-manifolds. High-dimensional manifold topology, 322–361, World Sci. Publ., River Edge, NJ, 2003.
$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Please specify the paper by editing the question (don't give it as an "answer"). $\endgroup$
    – Todd Trimble
    Apr 7, 2015 at 10:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ A preprint of the Luck-Rosenberg paper is available here. On page 2, it says "Let $G$ be a (not necessarily finite) discrete group $G$. A smooth $G$-manifold $M$ is a smooth manifold with an action of $G$ by diffeomorphisms. It is called cocompact if the quotient space $G \backslash M$ is compact. It is proper if the map $G \times M \to M \times M$, $(g,m) \mapsto (g \cdot m,m)$ is proper; when the action is cocompact, this happens if and only if all isotropy groups are finite." $\endgroup$ Apr 7, 2015 at 16:44
  • $\begingroup$ I don't think the downvote is justified. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Apr 7, 2015 at 18:45
  • $\begingroup$ This seems easy as long as the action is cellular. Presumably one can arrange this in the smooth setting. $\endgroup$
    – HJRW
    Apr 8, 2015 at 13:34

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

An extended comment: this is not true for actions on more general locally compact (Hausdorff metrizable) spaces. For instance, let $\Gamma$ be any countable group admitting infinitely many distinct subgroups of prime order $H_n$; write $H_\infty=\{1\}$. Denote $F=\{x_m:m\le\infty\}$ (the 1-point compactification of a countable discrete set). Let $X$ be the set of pairs $(f,y)$ with $f=x_m\in F$ and $y\in \Gamma/H_m$. It is naturally a $\Gamma$-set, where $g(f,y)=(f,gy)$. Make it a topological space so that $(x_m,y)$ is isolated for $m<\infty$ and a basis of neighborhoods for $(x_\infty,g)$ with $g\in \Gamma$ is given by $(V_n(g))$, where $V_n=\{(x_m,g'H_m):m\ge n, g\in g'H_m\}$. This makes the action of $\Gamma$ continuous. It is easily seen to be compact, it's slightly more subtle that it is Hausdorff: this uses the fact that for every $g\neq 1$ in $\Gamma$, there exists $n_0$ such that $g\notin H_n$ for $n\ge n_0$. The quotient of $X$ by the $\Gamma$-action can naturally be identified to $F$ and hence is Hausdorff compact.

Clearly the stabilizers are finite. But the action is not proper: write $y_n=H_n$ consider the compact (open) subset $K$ consisting of those $(x_n,y_n)$, $n\le\infty$. Then if $s_n$ is a nontrivial element in $H_n$, $s_n$ fixes $(x_n,y_n)$, and in particular $s_nK\cap K$ is not empty, and hence the action is not compact.

At this time I'm not sure how to change this into a manifold example but I'm skeptical about the claimed result. We can start from a connected Lie group $G$, consider $G\times\mathbf{R}/\mathbf{Z}$ with the left and right $G$-actions on each leaf, mod out the leaf $G\times\{t\}$ by the action on the right of some finite subgroup $F_t$ depending smoothly on $t$ for $t\neq 0$ and tending to the trivial subgroup $F_0=\{1\}$ when $t\to 0$ (in the sense that for every compact subset $K$ of $G$ there exists $\epsilon$ such that $|t|\le\epsilon$ implies $F_t\cap K=\{1\}$; we can find such guys in $\mathbf{SL}_2(\mathbf{R})$). The issue is to arrange the resulting space (on which $G$ still acts on the left, with finite stabilizers and quotient space $\mathbf{R}/\mathbf{Z}$ to be non-singular on the slice $G\times\{0\}$ (possibly $\mathbf{R}/\mathbf{Z}$ could be replaced with another closed manifold if it helps). The next issue is to find a discrete subgroup of $G$ whose action on the resulting space remains non-proper and with Hausdorff compact quotient...

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ PS: I tried further to get an examples following the last lines; the main issue is not smoothing (which is actually easy), nor ensuring non-properness and compact quotient, but to ensure that the quotient by the discrete subgroup is Hausdorff. $\endgroup$
    – YCor
    Apr 7, 2015 at 18:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.