1
$\begingroup$

I'd like to ask the following easy question, since I can't find a reference.

Let $X/\mathbb{Q}$ a smooth projective variety. How does one express the $L$-function of the twist, $L(H^i(X)(r), s)$ in terms of $L(H^i(X),s)$. Do they differ by only a shift in $s$?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. See: Serre, Jean-Pierre, Facteurs locaux des fonctions zêta des variétés algébriques (définitions et conjectures). (available at numdam.org/item?id=SDPP_1969-1970__11_2_A4_0) $\endgroup$
    – jmc
    Sep 20, 2014 at 17:26
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Sorry, that was a bit too fast. The answer is still yes. But the reference is wrong. See my answer below. $\endgroup$
    – jmc
    Sep 20, 2014 at 17:38

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

The answer is yes. On page 12 of [1], line 7 from the top, it reads $$ L(M (n), s) = L(M, s + n). $$

The article deals with compatible systems of cohomological realisations (one way to think and work with motives). Every variety gives rise to such a system, and every such system gives you an $L$-function.

Actually, if you carefully trace the definitions, this identity rolls out fairly easy. For a good overview of the definitions, see [2].


[1]: Minhyong Kim. “An introduction to motives I: classical motives and motivic $L$-functions” (available at http://ucl.ac.uk/~ucahmki/ihes3.pdf ).

[2]: Serre, Jean-Pierre. “Facteurs locaux des fonctions zêta des variétés algébriques (définitions et conjectures).” (available at http://archive.numdam.org/article/SDPP_1969-1970__11_2_A4_0.pdf)

$\endgroup$
1
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ That's correct. Lest someone get a wrong impression from the reference to a recent paper, this is not a theorem: just a tautology from the definition. $\endgroup$
    – Joël
    Sep 20, 2014 at 19:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.