1
$\begingroup$

I've come across the following simple family of PDE's and am wondering if they fit into a better known class or if they are attack-able by any standard techniques. The equation for $u(x, t)$ with $t \geq 0,x \geq 1$ is $$ u_{tx} = - (1 - u)^n $$ with boundary conditions $$ \begin{cases} u_t(x, 0) = 1 - x \\ u(x, 0) = 0 \\ u(1, t) = 0 \end{cases} $$ with $n \geq 1$ an integer.

$\endgroup$
9
  • $\begingroup$ what about power series in $t,(x-1)$? but you're missing anyway a boundary condition at $x\to\infty$... $\endgroup$ Jun 2, 2014 at 18:53
  • $\begingroup$ How can you have $u(x,0)=0$ and $u_x(x,0)=1-x$? $\endgroup$ Jun 2, 2014 at 18:55
  • $\begingroup$ Quite unlikely, indeed... Thanks Michael Renardy for pointing that out. Is there a typo, or should we close? $\endgroup$ Jun 2, 2014 at 19:05
  • $\begingroup$ It was a typo - thanks for catching it. $\endgroup$
    – guest
    Jun 2, 2014 at 19:13
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Ummm.. This is just the wave equation in 2d in null coordinates with nonlinearity $-(1-u)^n$. Is that where you got it from? $\endgroup$
    – k3thomps
    Jun 2, 2014 at 19:14

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

I would set $u_x=v$ and reformulate the problem as $$v_t(x,t)=-(1-\int_1^x v(y,t)\,dy)^n, v(x,0)=0.$$ In this formulation, existence, uniqueness and numerical solution all become fairly straightforward. I doubt that there is much hope for a more explicit solution.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ The constraint $u(1,t)=0=u(x,0)$ are used, but what about $u_t(x,0)=1-x$? I don't see it right away. $\endgroup$
    – username
    Jun 2, 2014 at 23:25
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It is automatic. You have $v_t(x,0)=u_{xt}(x,0)=-1$, and then you integrate using the boundary condition at $x=1$. $\endgroup$ Jun 2, 2014 at 23:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.