-2
$\begingroup$

Assume that $\lim_{(nt) |z|\to 1}|f(z)|(1-|z|)^p=0$, where $f$ is analytic in the unit disk and $p>0$,where $(nt)|z|\to 1$ nontangentially. Does this implies that $\lim_{|z|\to 1}|f(z)|(1-|z|)^p=0$ uniformly?

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Why the mysterious $nt$ and why is it the derivative? Are you asking if pointwise convergence implies uniform convergence in this case? $\endgroup$ Oct 1, 2013 at 16:03
  • $\begingroup$ is it related to bloch space? $\endgroup$
    – Koushik
    Oct 1, 2013 at 16:08
  • $\begingroup$ No, when I said $|z|\to 1$ uniformly I had in mind that $z\to e^{it}$ for some $t$ and throughout the unit disk. Nontangentialy means that $z$ also tends to $e^{it}$ but inside an fixed angle. $\endgroup$
    – user36162
    Oct 1, 2013 at 16:10
  • $\begingroup$ &Koushik: It is related to little Bloch space. $\endgroup$
    – user36162
    Oct 1, 2013 at 16:11
  • $\begingroup$ So $(nt)$ just means "nontangential"? $\endgroup$ Oct 1, 2013 at 19:01

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

No, it does not. There can be a region $D$ in the disc with one boundary point on the circle, say $1$, which approaches this point tangentially. And a function which is bounded outside $D$ but grows arbitrarily fast in $D$. To non-tangential limits of your expression at all points are zero, but there is no uniformity, and the growth is arbitrarily high. Such function can be constructed in many ways, using for example approximation theorems, or Cauchy integrals.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.