2
$\begingroup$

I am not sure where one looks up this type of fact. Google was not very helpful.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Chain complexes of abelian groups? Or more generally with values in an abelian category with enough injectives? $\endgroup$ Sep 5, 2013 at 16:08
  • $\begingroup$ What do you mean exactly by "enough injectives"? Do you mean that every chain complex is quasi-isomorphic to one consisting only of injectives? I know at least for modules over a ring that every chain complex is quasi-isomorphic to one consisting only of projectives (see, for example, Hovey - Model Categories, Section 2.3). Also archive.numdam.org/ARCHIVE/CM/CM_1988__65_2/CM_1988__65_2_121_0/… might be of interest. $\endgroup$ Sep 5, 2013 at 16:12
  • $\begingroup$ @Martin: Good question! The argument I gave below works for chain complexes with values in any Grothendieck abelian category, since they are closed under the formation of diagram categories. $\endgroup$ Sep 5, 2013 at 16:13

2 Answers 2

6
$\begingroup$

Yes, any Grothendieck abelian category has enough injectives. I believe this goes back to Grothendieck's Tohoku paper. The category in question is Grothendieck abelian since it is equivalent to a category of additive presheaves. The domain category has objects the integers, and morphisms generated by $d_n: n \rightarrow n+1$ (or the other way around depending on your grading conventions), subject to the relations $d_{n+1} \circ d_n=0$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ It's Theorem 1.10.1 in Grothendieck's Tohoku paper. $\endgroup$ Sep 5, 2013 at 16:07
4
$\begingroup$

Appealing to Grothendieck's theorem is pretty much over the top. It's completely elementary. Suppose $\cal A$ is an abelian (or exact) category with enough injectives.

A complex is injective if and only if it is (a retract of a) split exact complex with injective components.

First note that the functor $A^\bullet \mapsto A^n$ that sends a complex to its $n$-th component is exact and has a right adjoint $D^n$. The right adjoint is given by the complex $D^n(A) = ( \cdots \to 0 \to A \stackrel{1}{\to} A \to 0 \to \cdots)$ where $A$ sits in degrees $n$ and $n+1$, so $D^n(I)$ is injective whenever $I$ is injective.

For a complex $A^\bullet$ let $IA^\bullet$ be the complex with components $(IA)^{n} =A^n \oplus A^{n+1}$ and differential $\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1_{A^{n+1}} \\ 0 & 0\end{pmatrix}$, so $IA = \prod_{n \in \mathbb{Z}} D^n(A^n)$. Note that $IA$ is a split exact complex and the chain map $(1_{A^n} \, d^{n})^t \colon A^n \to A^{n} \oplus A^{n+1}$ is degreewise split monic. Now choose for each $A^n$ a monic $i^n \colon A^n \rightarrowtail I^n$ into an injective and put $J^n = I^n \oplus I^{n+1}$ to obtain the complex $J^\bullet$ with differential $\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1_{I^{n+1}} \\ 0 & 0\end{pmatrix}$, so $J^\bullet = \prod_{n \in \mathbb{Z}} D^{n}(I^n)$. The complex $J^\bullet$ is injective as a product of injective complexes and the $i^n$ yield a chain map $i \colon IA \rightarrowtail J$ in an obvious way. The composite $A^\bullet \rightarrowtail IA^\bullet \rightarrowtail J^\bullet$ embeds the complex $A^\bullet$ into an injective complex.

To prove the emphasized statement, note that if we start with an injective complex $A^\bullet$, it is a retract of $J^\bullet$. Conversely, every retract of a split exact complex of injectives is a retract of a complex of the form $J^\bullet$, hence injective.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ I feel that your $(1_{A^n} , d^{n})^t \colon A^n \to A^{n} \oplus A^{n+1}$ does not commute with the two differentials. For the $IA$, your differential only maps to one component, while your $(1_{A^n} , d^{n})^t$ touches both. $\endgroup$
    – Honglu
    Mar 31, 2014 at 18:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.