2
$\begingroup$

Suppose $G$ is a compact Lie group acting freely on a topological space $Q$ (about whose separation conditions I make no assumptions) and the qoutient $Q/G$ is known to be completely regular Hausdorff (or even paracompact Hausdorff). Can one deduce that $Q \to Q/G$ is a principal bundle? If $Q$ itself (rather than $Q/G$) were completely regular, this result is well known. Perhaps it follows that $Q$ must be completely regular if $Q/G$ is?

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ I guess the ending not in the parenthetical remark in your title is a typo? $\endgroup$ Aug 8, 2013 at 22:08
  • $\begingroup$ Maybe you can use metrization theorem on the quotient and try to build a metric on $Q$ out of it and metric on $G$? $\endgroup$ Aug 8, 2013 at 22:21
  • $\begingroup$ Think of the case when $G$ is finite and acts simply transitively. $\endgroup$
    – Misha
    Aug 9, 2013 at 3:27
  • $\begingroup$ Did you try to adapt Palais' proof of the slice theorem? MR0126506 (23 #A3802) Palais, Richard S. On the existence of slices for actions of non-compact Lie groups. Ann. of Math. (2) 73 1961 295–323. $\endgroup$ Aug 9, 2013 at 5:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Maybe, you should add the requirement that each $G$-orbit (with subspace topology) is homeomorphic to $G$. $\endgroup$ Aug 9, 2013 at 19:54

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

Take $X$ to be finite with trivial topology, let $G$ be a finite cyclic group acting simply transitively on $X$. If you equip $G$ with discrete topology then it is a Lie group. The quotient $Y=X/G$ is a single point, so it satisfies all the regularity properties you can imagine. However, the quotient map $X\to Y$ is clearly not a bundle. Thus, at the very least you need the original space to be Hausdorff.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.