1
$\begingroup$

Everyone seems to use the slope definition of stability for vector bundles without making any mention to the fact that this should be the correct definition describing that a stable equivalence class of vector bundles is then equivalent to a stable orbit under the action of the gauge group on say, the space of all connections.

Edit:

To be more precise, The notion of a stable orbit of a group action requires that, say, the stabilizer of an element be discrete. Now, viewing vector bundles as isomorphism classes under the action of the gauge group, one says that a vector bundle is stable if it satisfies the slope condition (all sub-bundles have strictly less slope). The question is, how is this slope inequality equivalent to the definition of stable orbit for group actions.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ "this should be the correct definition": what is here "this"? Could you edit the language of your question? I have difficoulties understanding it. It is fine if you use more than one sentence... $\endgroup$ Aug 6, 2013 at 18:50
  • $\begingroup$ Okie, I have edited the question. Please let me know if it is now up to snuff. $\endgroup$
    – BenSmith
    Aug 7, 2013 at 15:01

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.