3
$\begingroup$

Let $\ell$ be a prime number, denote by $K_\ell$ the maximal algebraic extension of $\Bbb{Q}$ ramified only at $\ell$. Let $f = \sum a_n q^n$ be a Hecke eigenform of level $1$ with integer coefficients. By a theorem of Serre and Deligne, there is a continuous homomorphism $$ \rho_\ell: \mathrm{Gal}(K_\ell / \Bbb{Q}) \to GL_2(\Bbb{Z}_\ell) $$ such that $\rho_\ell(\mathrm{Frob}_p)$ has characteristic polynomial $$ x^2 - a_p x + p^{k-1} $$ for each $p \neq \ell$. This induces the mod $\ell$ representation $\tilde{\rho}_\ell: \mathrm{Gal}(K_\ell / \Bbb{Q}) \to GL_2(\Bbb{F}_\ell)$.

Question: How to find the conductor of $\tilde{\rho}_\ell$?

We know that the conductor is a power of $\ell$ since $K_\ell$ is ramified only at $\ell$. But I don't know if we have control on the exponent.

We've looked at section 5.5 of the notes by Bryden Cais on Serre's Conjectures (http://math.stanford.edu/~conrad/vigregroup/vigre05/Serre05.pdf), which seems to be related to my question, but I'm not familiar with the topic enough to understand the relation.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Did you mean to ask about the conductor of the mod $\ell$ representation, instead of $\ell$--adic? $\endgroup$ Jul 18, 2013 at 13:14
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, I mean the mod $\ell$ representation. Thanks. $\endgroup$
    – B Chung
    Jul 18, 2013 at 13:28
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The $\ell$-part of the conductor of the mod $\ell$-representation comes out of the recipe for the weight in Serre's conjecture. A special case is that the representation is unramified at $\ell$ if and only if the weight of the representation is $1$. This should be in Cais's notes, or in Edixhoven's paper Inv. Math. 109 (1992) 563-594. $\endgroup$ Jul 18, 2013 at 14:54

1 Answer 1

9
$\begingroup$

It is difficult to even define the conductor at $\ell$. The problem is that rho is infinitely wildly ramified at $\ell$ (it must be, since its determinant is a power of the $\ell$-adic cyclotomic character); so the naive definition of the conductor would be infinity.

The morally right way to define the conductor at p of a p-adic Galois representation is to use Fontaine's p-adic Hodge theory. In your case the representation is crystalline at $\ell$, so the conductor is 1, matching the level of the modular form.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Oh I'm sorry. I mean the mod $\ell$ representation (edited above) instead of the $\ell$-adic one. Sorry for the typo. $\endgroup$
    – B Chung
    Jul 18, 2013 at 13:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.