1
$\begingroup$

More generally, suppose $S$ is a subspace of a Hilbert space $H$ that contains an orthonormal basis of $H$ (For example- the Schwartz space inside $L^2(\mathbb{R}^n)$). If $A:S \rightarrow S$ is symmetric, is $A$ necessarily essentially self-adjoint? That is, does $A$ have a unique self-adjoint extension?

This seems like it would be a standard theorem if it were true, and my inability to find such a statement on, say, Wikipedia, suggests that it is probably false.

This seems elementary- but my first attempts at a proof have not been successful. Maybe somebody knows of a good counterexample?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Note that by the Gram-Schmidt, every dense subspace $S$ contains an orthonormal basis. Thus here the operator $A$ is just symmetric, densely defined, with $A(S)\subset A$, and the standard counterexamples work (e.g. $i d/dx$ on the half-line). Or am I missing something? $\endgroup$ Nov 5, 2012 at 7:50

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

One needs additional assumptions to obtain essential self-adjointness. In particular, it is sufficient that S contains a dense set of analytic vectors. The whole subject is explained very well in Vol.2 of "Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics" by Reed and Simon.

$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.