5
$\begingroup$

Is the stable homotopy category idempotent complete? I have not been able to prove it, and the proof for abelian groups seems to strongly rely on looking at elements.

Thanks, Jon

$\endgroup$
4
  • 8
    $\begingroup$ Hi Jon. Another argument for this result (besides the one Neil Strickland gives) is to use Brown representability: given an idempotent $e: X \to X$, then $e$ defines an idempotent in $X$-cohomology and therefore gives another cohomology theory on spaces (or spectra), since the category of cohomology theories is idempotent complete. Now represent this theory by a spectrum. $\endgroup$ Oct 21, 2012 at 2:09
  • $\begingroup$ Hi @Akhil, thanks! However, the statement that the category of cohomology theories is idempotent complete seems to be equivalent to saying that the category of spectra is idempotent complete? $\endgroup$ Oct 21, 2012 at 17:51
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I suppose, but the latter can be proved purely algebraically. Namely, given an idempotent $e: h \to h$ on a cohomology theory $h$, you can define a new cohomology theory which sends any space (or spectrum) $Y$ to the image of $e$ in $h^*(Y)$. $\endgroup$ Oct 21, 2012 at 21:23
  • $\begingroup$ Aha of course, that's clever! And yeah, I guess it is equivalent, by precisely your argument above. Thanks again. :-) $\endgroup$ Oct 21, 2012 at 22:04

1 Answer 1

14
$\begingroup$

Yes, this is a standard fact. Given a self-map $e\colon X\to X$, we write $e^{-1}X$ for the telescope of the sequence $X\xrightarrow{e}X\xrightarrow{e}X\xrightarrow{e}\dotsb$ (constructed as the cofibre of a suitable self-map of $\bigvee_{i=0}^\infty X$). If $e$ is idempotent, one can check that the natural map $X\to e^{-1}X\vee (1-e)^{-1}X$ is an equivalence, and that $e$ acts as the identity on the first factor and as zero on the second; in other words, we have a splitting of $e$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Awesome! Thanks so much. I figured it must be true. That's immensely helpful (since I can apply to recent work on idempotent complete triangulated categories!). $\endgroup$ Oct 21, 2012 at 16:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.