User kallikanzarid - MathOverflowmost recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-21T04:09:28Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/user/9435http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/45154/riemannian-metric-induced-by-a-metricRiemannian metric induced by a metricKallikanzarid2010-11-07T10:07:13Z2010-11-07T14:39:31Z
<p>Let $M$ be a smooth manifold, $\rho(p, q)$ — a differentiable metric on $M$. Can we construct Riemannian metric $g(X,Y)$ on $TM$ that induces $\rho(p, q)$? Under what conditions?</p>
<p>I'm sure this question has been dealt with, I just didn't find it in the quick survey of literature :)</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/39676/which-bianchi-identity-is-due-to-bianchi-or-not-since-it-might-be-due-to-ricci/42379#42379Answer by Kallikanzarid for Which Bianchi identity is due to Bianchi (or not, since it might be due to Ricci (according to Levi-Civita (according to MO))) or vice versa?Kallikanzarid2010-10-16T10:01:26Z2010-10-16T10:01:26Z<p>The first one is due to Ricci, and the second one is due to Bianchi.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/40082/why-do-we-teach-calculus-students-the-derivative-as-a-limit/40102#40102Answer by Kallikanzarid for Why do we teach calculus students the derivative as a limit?Kallikanzarid2010-09-27T07:21:28Z2010-09-27T07:29:48Z<p>$\frac{\sin x}{x}$ at $x = 0$ should be a good example.</p>
<p>P.S.: Talking about esoteric definitions, if you can introduce stationary point without derivatives, you can then introduce derivatives using sheaves, like you would introduce vectors on a smooth manifold. It would broaden the consciousness of your freshmen, he-he ^_^</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/39579/studying-non-linear-pdes-with-manifoldsStudying non-linear PDEs with manifoldsKallikanzarid2010-09-22T05:11:55Z2010-09-22T17:32:04Z
<p>I'm sorry if this is an inappropriate forum to ask this question on, for I fear it is pretty undergraduate-level one :) I was contemplating on the study of non-linear PDEs. Is it possible to reduce a non-linear PDE on <code>$\mathbb{R}^n$</code> to a distribution or a 'good' PDE on a smooth manifold? It seems to me like a natural step, but I don't know anything about it yet :(</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/50048/non-linear-fourier-analysisComment by KallikanzaridKallikanzarid2010-12-22T13:20:36Z2010-12-22T13:20:36ZIf some family of these beasts forms a frame, you can. Otherwise, you can't.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/45778/philosophical-consistency-proof-for-set-theoryComment by KallikanzaridKallikanzarid2010-11-12T03:40:12Z2010-11-12T03:40:12ZI'm just a grad student in geometry, though :)http://mathoverflow.net/questions/45778/philosophical-consistency-proof-for-set-theoryComment by KallikanzaridKallikanzarid2010-11-12T03:39:13Z2010-11-12T03:39:13ZPP seems like assuming a lot about space-time, and it disagrees with my intuitive understanding of mathematics as studying relationships in formal systems, not events.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/45530/approach-to-solving-a-differential-functional-equation/45533#45533Comment by KallikanzaridKallikanzarid2010-11-10T17:29:31Z2010-11-10T17:29:31ZWould you please stop spamming threads?http://mathoverflow.net/questions/45277/how-close-are-we-to-extending-tetration-to-the-real-and-complex-numbersComment by KallikanzaridKallikanzarid2010-11-09T05:09:28Z2010-11-09T05:09:28ZMathematics has gone a long way since tetration was first studied. I'm afraid very few professional mathematicians will study it as something more than a hobby.
However, if you want to generate a sustainable interest of mathematical community even at this level, the best way to do it would be to
1) dig up and organize for easy access previous professional works on the subject
2) rework amateur papers into a monograph, increasing their rigor and providing a consistent and spartan language and notation.
I'm just a graduate student myself, though, so take my words with a grain of salt :)http://mathoverflow.net/questions/45154/riemannian-metric-induced-by-a-metric/45172#45172Comment by KallikanzaridKallikanzarid2010-11-07T15:30:33Z2010-11-07T15:30:33ZUpd: I think the problem in Igor's comment and the one in my previous comment are equivalent, because $g \mapsto \rho_g$ is injective, and so it is bijective to it's total image.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/45154/riemannian-metric-induced-by-a-metric/45172#45172Comment by KallikanzaridKallikanzarid2010-11-07T15:26:44Z2010-11-07T15:26:44ZI was interested in finding the conditions, under which for $\rho(p,q)$ there is a $g(X,Y)$ such that $\rho_g(p,q) \equiv \rho(p,q)$, where $\rho_g(p,q)$ is constructed from $g$ as usual, and how can such $g$ be constructed from $\rho$. Thanks for the links :)http://mathoverflow.net/questions/45154/riemannian-metric-induced-by-a-metricComment by KallikanzaridKallikanzarid2010-11-07T10:51:06Z2010-11-07T10:51:06Z@Suvrit I doubt it.
@Christian Good point. I feel a bit fishy about it, though, I'll dig into it deeper :)
@Paolo Yeah, I was thinking in this line, too.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/44208/is-there-any-formal-foundation-to-ultrafinitismComment by KallikanzaridKallikanzarid2010-10-30T12:37:11Z2010-10-30T12:37:11ZNelson doesn't look too much sane to me ;)http://mathoverflow.net/questions/42929/suggestions-for-good-notation/42941#42941Comment by KallikanzaridKallikanzarid2010-10-21T03:45:08Z2010-10-21T03:45:08ZI like $i = \overline{1, n}$http://mathoverflow.net/questions/42929/suggestions-for-good-notation/42945#42945Comment by KallikanzaridKallikanzarid2010-10-21T03:42:48Z2010-10-21T03:42:48Z$\mathbf{1}_X$ is conventionally used for characteristic function of a set.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/42929/suggestions-for-good-notationComment by KallikanzaridKallikanzarid2010-10-21T03:38:28Z2010-10-21T03:38:28ZIsn't $x \mapsto f(x)$ commonplace? As for homomorphisms, they are not simply maps, and $\mathrm{Hom}(A, B)$ denotes the whole class, while $A \to B$ denotes a single mapping.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/13320/cool-problems-to-impress-students-with-group-theory/13329#13329Comment by KallikanzaridKallikanzarid2010-10-06T14:00:39Z2010-10-06T14:00:39ZYakov Perelman demonstrated the solution without explicitly introducing any math above elementary school level at all :)http://mathoverflow.net/questions/39579/studying-non-linear-pdes-with-manifoldsComment by KallikanzaridKallikanzarid2010-09-22T13:48:50Z2010-09-22T13:48:50ZBy 'good' PDE I meant a PDE which preserves a certain operation on manifold just like linear PDEs on <code>$\mathbf{R}^n$</code> preserve linear combination of the solution. I'm afraid I cannot formulate this with more rigor, I'm only starting to seriously study manifolds, and I'm not very experienced with PDEs either.