User a grad student - MathOverflowmost recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-22T20:02:59Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/user/8814http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/37425/best-tablet-computer-for-mathematicsBest tablet computer for mathematicsA grad student2010-09-01T20:57:30Z2011-07-01T14:00:30Z
<p>I'm not sure if this is completely appropriate, but I thought I'd ask here.</p>
<p>I'm in the market for a tablet computer. Unfortunately, my (mathematical) needs are very different from the needs of the sorts of people who usually review these things. Namely, I want the tablet that is best for preparing lecture notes and taking notes in seminars. It seems like most of the reviewers on "computer" websites are either looking for toys (like the iPad) or tools for creating art. I just want the most efficient way to create a multi-page handwritten pdf. Does anyone have any recommendations?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/36838/are-non-pl-manifolds-cw-complexesAre non-PL manifolds CW-complexes?A grad student2010-08-27T03:48:08Z2010-08-27T04:04:25Z
<p>Can every topological (not necessarily smooth or PL) manifold be given the structure of a CW complex?</p>
<p>I'm pretty sure that the answer is yes. However, I have not managed to find a reference for this.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/37425/best-tablet-computer-for-mathematics/37430#37430Comment by A grad studentA grad student2010-09-01T21:44:02Z2010-09-01T21:44:02ZYeah, I don't want to type (I can do that on a laptop). I want to write and draw figures with a pen. I also don't care about handwriting recognition.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/36838/are-non-pl-manifolds-cw-complexesComment by A grad studentA grad student2010-08-27T04:48:29Z2010-08-27T04:48:29Z@algori : I thought you had posted an (important sounding) comment? Why did you delete it?http://mathoverflow.net/questions/36838/are-non-pl-manifolds-cw-complexes/36841#36841Comment by A grad studentA grad student2010-08-27T04:27:33Z2010-08-27T04:27:33Z@Ryan : Yes, I think that is what Milnor proved (it's also been a long time since I looked at it).http://mathoverflow.net/questions/36838/are-non-pl-manifolds-cw-complexes/36841#36841Comment by A grad studentA grad student2010-08-27T04:08:09Z2010-08-27T04:08:09ZI think the fact that they have the homotopy type of a CW complex is due to Milnor (it is in his paper about spaces homotopy equivalent to CW complexes). Do Kirby-Siebenmann just prove this, or do they prove that all compact manifolds are homeomorphic to CW complexes? Also, how about the noncompact case? http://mathoverflow.net/questions/36838/are-non-pl-manifolds-cw-complexes/36840#36840Comment by A grad studentA grad student2010-08-27T03:56:48Z2010-08-27T03:56:48ZThat manifold isn't 2nd countable. Like most mathematicians, I only care about manifolds that are Hausdorff and 2nd countable.