User klaus draeger - MathOverflowmost recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-22T19:49:14Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/user/6634http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/110706/fixed-points-of-system-of-quadratic-equations/110747#110747Answer by Klaus Draeger for fixed points of system of quadratic equationsKlaus Draeger2012-10-26T11:36:22Z2012-10-26T11:36:22Z<p>The property does not hold as stated. Consider the case $u=(\frac{1}{2},\dots,\frac{1}{2}), A=\frac{1}{4}I,$ and $Q(x)_i = \frac{1}{4}x_i^2$. Then $\Phi$ maps $(x_1,\dots,x_n)$ to $\frac{1}{4}(x_1^2+x_1+2,\dots,x_n^2+x_n+2)$, and all $x$ with $x_i\in{1,2}$ are fixed points.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/27297/is-this-problem-solvable-in-polynomial-time/27342#27342Answer by Klaus Draeger for Is this problem solvable in polynomial time?Klaus Draeger2010-06-07T12:31:39Z2010-06-07T12:31:39Z<p>There is a straightforward encoding of 3-SAT into this problem, which means that unless P=NP, no, there cannot be a polynomial-time algorithm that solves it. The encoding can be constructed as follows. Given a formula $\phi=\psi_1\wedge\dots\wedge\psi_k$ in conjunctive normal form over propositional variables $v_1,\dots,v_n$, you have the following boxes:</p>
<ol>
<li>For each $v_i$, two boxes $A_i, B_i$ representing the literals $v_i$ and $\neg v_i$. Both contain a single unit-weight circle. </li>
<li>Also for each $v_i$, a box $C_i$ representing the law of the excluded middle: This box contains two circles with weight 0, one connected to $A_i$, the other to $B_i$.</li>
<li>For each clause $\psi_j=l_1\vee l_2 \vee l_3$, a box $D_j$ containing three weight-0 circles connected to the corresponding $A_i$ or $B_i$.</li>
<li>The root box, containing a single weight-0 circle connected to all the $C_i$ and $D_j$.</li>
</ol>
<p>This can be done in time linear in the size of $\phi$.</p>
<p>Then a set of circles satisfying your constraints must contain at least one of $A_i,B_i$ for all $i$, and has weight $n$ if and only if it corresponds to a valid valuation of the $v_i$ which satisfies $\phi$. In particular, satisfiability of $\phi$ can be decided by checking if the minimum weight solution has weight $n$.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/130573/two-boy-scouts-problemsComment by Klaus DraegerKlaus Draeger2013-05-14T13:24:33Z2013-05-14T13:24:33ZYour original problem does sound solvable to me (essentially, you need a $(2n-1)$-edge coloring of $K_{2n}$). Is there an additional constraint (e.g. only one match of each sport per round)?http://mathoverflow.net/questions/121784/who-knows-this-convex-polytopeComment by Klaus DraegerKlaus Draeger2013-02-14T13:05:47Z2013-02-14T13:05:47ZNo real answer, but I think you want six parallelepipeds, not four.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/106591/sum-of-the-following-series-fibonacci-lucasComment by Klaus DraegerKlaus Draeger2012-09-07T11:37:00Z2012-09-07T11:37:00ZIn the step where you add the summation, I don't see why you have a quadratic polynomial factor in $(Luc(n+5)/5)*((n*(n+1)/2)-1)$. That should be just $(Luc(n+5)/5)*(n-1)$. http://mathoverflow.net/questions/99853/resources-aware-combinatorial-game-theoryComment by Klaus DraegerKlaus Draeger2012-06-18T13:10:21Z2012-06-18T13:10:21ZJust to clarify: the resources spent on moves are removed from the game? I'm asking because there is also the related version in which they go to the opponent, so that you can actually regain resources (and they don't a priori limit they number of moves). http://mathoverflow.net/questions/89659/affine-space-partition-of-a-general-setComment by Klaus DraegerKlaus Draeger2012-02-27T13:52:38Z2012-02-27T13:52:38ZDo you have any restrictions on the kind of covering you want (minimum number of spaces, say?) After all, every single point of $F_q^n$ is an affine subspace.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/87688/linear-algebra-find-an-n-dimensional-vector-orthogonal-to-a-given-vectorComment by Klaus DraegerKlaus Draeger2012-02-06T17:21:41Z2012-02-06T17:21:41ZAre there any other constraints? Otherwise, let $a$ be the given vector. If $a_1=0$, then $(1,0,0,\dots)$ works; if $a_2=0$, then $(0,1,0,0,\dots)$ works; otherwise, $(a_2,-a_1,0,0,\dots)$ works.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/85311/optimization-of-a-specific-polynomialComment by Klaus DraegerKlaus Draeger2012-01-11T12:14:00Z2012-01-11T12:14:00ZFollowing up on Pietro's comment: Suppose wlog that $c_1,c_2,c_3\neq 0$. Consider the behaviour of $f$ along the line $\{(x,x,x,0,\dots,0)|x\in\mathbb{R}\}$: It reduces to $g(x) = c_1c_2c_3x^3+h(x)$, where $h$ is quadratic, so $g$, and therefore also $f$, is unbounded in both directions. http://mathoverflow.net/questions/77676/is-there-an-upper-bound-to-strongly-connected-componentsComment by Klaus DraegerKlaus Draeger2011-10-10T15:17:21Z2011-10-10T15:17:21ZSorry, cannot edit my comment - that should of course be $n(n-1) + m(m+1)\geq 2e$.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/77676/is-there-an-upper-bound-to-strongly-connected-componentsComment by Klaus DraegerKlaus Draeger2011-10-10T13:50:30Z2011-10-10T13:50:30ZIf $e$ is greater than that, you can still get up to $n-m$ SCCs, where $m$ is the least integer such that $n(n-1)+m(m+1)\leq 2e$, by starting with the maximal acyclic graph and adding all back edges into a single SCC of minimal size.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/68436/what-the-heck-is-the-continuum-hypothesis-doing-in-weibels-homological-algebra/68514#68514Comment by Klaus DraegerKlaus Draeger2011-06-23T13:03:08Z2011-06-23T13:03:08ZAnd even "essentially countable" structures (at least as I understand the term) are not entirely safe, see for example Friedman's paper <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/math/9811187" rel="nofollow">arxiv.org/abs/math/9811187</a>http://mathoverflow.net/questions/65957/general-integer-solution-for-x2y2-z2-1/65961#65961Comment by Klaus DraegerKlaus Draeger2011-05-25T18:20:03Z2011-05-25T18:20:03Zoops - yes, of course. Thanks!http://mathoverflow.net/questions/65952/n-partite-n-cliqueComment by Klaus DraegerKlaus Draeger2011-05-25T13:45:53Z2011-05-25T13:45:53ZYou would need at least some constraint on the number of isolated vertices, wouldn't you? Currently, the graph with no edges at all is a counterexample.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/65957/general-integer-solution-for-x2y2-z2-1/65961#65961Comment by Klaus DraegerKlaus Draeger2011-05-25T13:35:37Z2011-05-25T13:35:37ZLooks good. One way of getting there is setting $a:=x+z, b:=x-y$ to obtain $ab=(1+y)(1-y)$, so that there must be $r,s,t,u$ with $rs=a,tu=b,1+y=rt,1-y=su$.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/51765/a-special-class-of-regular-languages-circular-languages-is-it-knownComment by Klaus DraegerKlaus Draeger2011-01-12T14:39:38Z2011-01-12T14:39:38ZJust to clarify: You are really only interested in languages which satisfy the cyclicity condition and are, in addition, regular? I ask because the condition itself does not imply regularity - consider, for example, the language of well-matched parentheses.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/35787/upper-bound-on-number-of-lines-in-a-linear-space-given-degree-boundsComment by Klaus DraegerKlaus Draeger2010-08-17T09:36:44Z2010-08-17T09:36:44ZFor $n > q+2$, that would violate the first condition (since every point would lie on $n-1 > q+1$ lines)