User leah wrenn berman - MathOverflowmost recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-22T01:19:52Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/user/607http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/54229/coloring-toroidal-polyhedra-with-convex-facesColoring toroidal polyhedra with convex faces?Leah Wrenn Berman2011-02-03T19:26:24Z2011-02-04T18:04:45Z
<p>Consider a toroidal polyhedron, which is a topological torus, in which all faces are planar, two faces meet in at most an edge, and adjacent faces are not coplanar. The Szilassi polyhedron has 7 non-convex hexagonal faces meeting 3 at a vertex, and every face meets every other face, so it requires 7 colors.</p>
<p>In 1982 ("Coloring Polyhedral Manifolds"), Barnette proved if you require that every face of the toroidal polyhedron be convex, then the polyhedron can be colored in at most 6 colors, and remarked that all the examples that he knew about could be colored in only 4 colors.</p>
<p>(1) Are there known examples which require 5 colors? 6 colors? Alternately, are there any more recent results on colorability of toroidal polyhedra with convex faces?</p>
<p>(2) Are there any known results about coloring toroidal polyhedra embedded on n-holed tori? Is there a "Szilassi polyhedron analogue" for larger genus? Are there known results if you impose convexity?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/29137/good-combinatorics-textbooks-for-teaching-undergraduates/29836#29836Answer by Leah Wrenn Berman for Good combinatorics textbooks for teaching undergraduates?Leah Wrenn Berman2010-06-28T21:37:21Z2010-06-28T21:37:21Z<p>I liked Roberts & Tesman, <em>Applied Combinatorics</em> (2nd edition), but it's out of print. It has nice applications and nice references. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/20551/sources-for-bibtex-entries/20661#20661Answer by Leah Wrenn Berman for Sources for Bibtex entriesLeah Wrenn Berman2010-04-07T21:14:07Z2010-04-07T21:14:07Z<p>If you use a mac, <a href="http://bibdesk.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">BibDesk</a> is fantastic: among other really nice features, it lets you find your book/article/etc on your choice of free sites (ACM, arXiv, CiteULike, Google Scholar, HubMed, SPIRES) or subscription sites (IEEE Xplore, MathSciNet, Project Euclid, Zentralblatt Math) and then once you've found the item, it takes one click to import the citation into the database. The database can also store electronic copies of articles (if available) referenced to the citation.</p>
<p>So for example, I would open BibDesk, click on the icon that says Web, click on "MathSciNet". Within the program I see the MathSciNet page (assuming I'm at work where I have access). Type in the search terms Hartshorne and Geometry, and up comes 8 citations I could import. One of them is <em>Algebraic Geometry</em> from 1977, so I would click on the button that says "import". BibDesk does all the other work.</p>
<p>While writing a paper, just drag and drop the citations onto your LaTeX document to embed \cite{blah} with the appropriate cite key (at least if you're using TeXShop).</p>
<p>When you're ready to stick a bibliography into your paper, select the relevant articles in the BibDesk database and export them into a BibTeX file. It's super easy.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/20207/is-this-an-if-and-only-if-definition-of-affine/20249#20249Answer by Leah Wrenn Berman for Is this an if-and-only-if definition of affine?Leah Wrenn Berman2010-04-03T17:01:24Z2010-04-03T17:01:24Z<p>There seems to be some disagreement about what precisely the definition of an affine transformation is. For example, <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=KW4EwONsQJgC&pg=PA169&dq=affine+transformation&lr=&ei=O3K3S7qnIZWKkATS1dygDg&cd=17#v=onepage&q=affine%2520transformation&f=false" rel="nofollow">Martin,</a> in his transformation geometry book, proves that an affine transformation is a map which takes any three noncollinear points to any other three noncollinear points (this is sometimes called <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=q49lhAzXTFEC&pg=PA73&dq=brannan+affine+theorem&lr=&ei=RnS3S_SjFI7ikwSk_L3wBA&cd=1#v=onepage&q=brannan%2520affine%2520theorem&f=false" rel="nofollow">the fundamental theorem of affine geometry</a>). In particular, this means that every affine transformation may be represented as the composition of an <em>invertible</em> linear transformation and a translation. </p>
<p>On the other hand, <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=wCfWkc_E3GkC&pg=PA122&dq=affine+transformation&ei=G3K3S-iLJIXylQTk0JiTBA&cd=2#v=onepage&q=affine%2520transformation&f=false" rel="nofollow">some references</a> simply define an affine transformation as the composition of a linear transformation and a translation, in which case the transformation need not be invertible.</p>
<p>(I'm not familiar with the second reference; it was just handy on a Google Books search on Affine transformations.)</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/19987/math-paper-authors-order/20114#20114Answer by Leah Wrenn Berman for Math paper authors' orderLeah Wrenn Berman2010-04-01T23:31:14Z2010-04-01T23:31:14Z<p>I had always heard that there was a famous counterexample to alphabetization, the <a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/h2vx20k101614221/" rel="nofollow">Zucker-Cox Theorem</a> (where they flipped the order for obvious reasons), but apparently the non-alphebetization in this case was apocryphal.</p>
<p>But indeed, non-alphabetization is very rare.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/19747/the-symmetry-of-a-soccer-ball/19870#19870Answer by Leah Wrenn Berman for The Symmetry of a Soccer BallLeah Wrenn Berman2010-03-30T19:22:45Z2010-03-30T19:22:45Z<p>If you are willing to relax the trivalency requirement (and not require convexity, which was not one of the stated constraints), you can make all sorts of polyhedra, using only regular pentagons and hexagons, which have all sorts of symmetry. </p>
<p>For example, start with two truncated icosahedra, and remove one hexagon from each of them. Now you can glue them together along the removed hexagons (matching up pentagonal and hexagonal faces), forming a new polyhedron with 3 and 4-valent vertices and considerably less symmetry than what you started with. Continuing, you could make long rod-shaped polyhedra, or you could make some spiky polyhedron by replacing multiple hexagons with other truncated icosahedra.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/19496/approximate-solutions-for-trisecting-the-angle-or-squaring-the-circle/19567#19567Answer by Leah Wrenn Berman for Approximate solutions for trisecting the angle or squaring the circleLeah Wrenn Berman2010-03-28T01:31:32Z2010-03-28T01:31:32Z<p>Do you know about the (Archimedean) <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angle_trisection#With_a_marked_ruler" rel="nofollow">solution to trisecting the angle if you allow a marked ruler?</a> </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/18798/are-combinatorial-configurations-whose-levi-graphs-may-be-represented-as-coveringAre combinatorial configurations whose Levi graphs may be represented as covering graphs over voltage graphs realizable with pseudolines?Leah Wrenn Berman2010-03-19T22:04:37Z2010-03-20T17:02:30Z
<p>This question is related to <a href="http://mathoverflow.net/questions/18758/drawing-a-combinatorial-3-configuration-of-points-and-lines-with-pseudolines" rel="nofollow">this previous question</a>. Many combinatorial configurations have Levi graphs which may be represented as derived graphs obtained from voltage graphs over a cyclic group; in a number of such cases, it is possible to represent the combinatorial configuration as a geometric configuration (i.e., using points and straight lines in the Euclidean plane). </p>
<p>Given a bipartite graph which is obtained from a voltage graph, we can view it as a Levi graph of some combinatorial configuration. Is it possible to draw all such configurations using pseudolines? If not, are there easy/known constraints on the ones that fail? (e.g., if there are more than x points in the configuration, then things work? You can't use such-and-so groups as the cyclic group for the voltage graph?)</p>
<p>(Does the Heawood graph have a voltage-graph representation? If so, it makes the first question easy to answer, but the second one is still interesting. Maybe.)</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/17778/books-you-would-like-to-see-translated-into-english/17787#17787Answer by Leah Wrenn Berman for Books you would like to see translated into English.Leah Wrenn Berman2010-03-11T00:43:51Z2010-03-11T00:43:51Z<p>Friedrich Levi, <em>Geometrische Konfigurationen</em></p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/966/looking-for-cubic-bipartite-graphs-with-girth-at-least-six-and-no-cycles-of-lengLooking for cubic, bipartite graphs with girth at least six and no cycles of length 8.Leah Wrenn Berman2009-10-18T00:31:28Z2010-03-10T15:43:28Z
<p>Aside from the Desargues graph, are there nice (at least vertex-transitive), small (say, less than 60 vertices), cubic, bipartite graphs with girth at least 6 and no 8-cycles? (or, even better, no cycles of length congruent to 0 mod 4.) </p>
<p>Bonus: any idea how to use Mathematica to pull these out of its list of graphs it's got data for in Mathematica 7?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/17635/drawing-3-configurations-of-points-and-lines-with-straight-lines/18713#18713Comment by Leah Wrenn BermanLeah Wrenn Berman2010-03-20T18:10:43Z2010-03-20T18:10:43ZWould Mnev's Universality Theorem address the realizability question with <i>straight</i> lines? My (basically nonexistent) understanding was that it would/could apply via oriented matroids, and thus would have something to say about realizations by pseudolines. (I guess you could then ask if the pseudoline configuration was stretchable, but that's hard too...)http://mathoverflow.net/questions/18271/what-out-of-print-books-would-you-like-to-see-re-printedComment by Leah Wrenn BermanLeah Wrenn Berman2010-03-15T20:10:25Z2010-03-15T20:10:25ZI was going to say Grunbaum & Shephard, <i>Tilings and Patterns</i>, but it turns out it's being re-issued---in paperback, no less---later this year. I love dover books.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/15366/which-journals-publish-expository-work/15386#15386Comment by Leah Wrenn BermanLeah Wrenn Berman2010-03-12T04:56:37Z2010-03-12T04:56:37ZI don't really think of the dynamic surveys at EJC to be the kind of expository paper you're talking about, though---while all (most?) surveys are expository, not all expository articles are surveys. (And some of those surveys hardly count as articles: 219 pages (the survey on Graph Labelling) is a lot!)http://mathoverflow.net/questions/17635/drawing-3-configurations-of-points-and-lines-with-straight-linesComment by Leah Wrenn BermanLeah Wrenn Berman2010-03-12T03:01:23Z2010-03-12T03:01:23ZGr\"{u}nbaum's book definitely does <i>not</i> give an answer.