User mathlover - MathOverflowmost recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-21T18:16:01Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/user/3942http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/14972/is-the-topological-string-b-model-rigorously-definedIs the topological string B model rigorously definedmathlover2010-02-11T04:35:32Z2010-02-11T04:35:32Z
<blockquote>
<p><strong>Possible Duplicate:</strong><br />
<a href="http://mathoverflow.net/questions/8692/higher-genus-closed-string-b-model" rel="nofollow">Higher genus closed string B-model</a> </p>
</blockquote>
<p>In terms of math? Thanks!</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/14972/is-the-topological-string-b-model-rigorously-definedComment by mathlovermathlover2010-02-12T17:27:56Z2010-02-12T17:27:56ZHi,so the physical B model is not rigorous because the integral measure is not defined, right? Thanks for help!