User soheil malekzadeh - MathOverflowmost recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-20T20:51:01Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/user/3124http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/12827/cone-in-a-metric-spaceCone in a metric spaceSoheil Malekzadeh2010-01-24T07:19:05Z2013-03-16T17:59:45Z
<p>Hi everybody,</p>
<p>We know the definition of a cone in a Real Banach Space.
I want to know if there is any definition for a cone in an abstract metric space.
Have you ever seen such definition anywhere?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/123045/estimating-l1-functions-over-the-ball-with-radius-2rEstimating L1 functions over the ball with radius 2rSoheil Malekzadeh2013-02-26T23:48:53Z2013-03-15T20:48:28Z
<p>Let $ f $ be in $ L^1(\Omega) $ where $
\Omega $ is an open subset of $ \mathbb{R}^n $. Also, assume that $ B(x_i,r_i) $ is a collection of disjoint open balls in $ \Omega $ such that $ B(x_i,2r_i) \subseteq \Omega $. I was wondering if there is a way that we can find a function $ g \in L^1(\Omega) $ and possibly a constant $ C $ such that</p>
<p>$ \int_{B(x_i,2r_i)} | f | \le C\int_{B(x_i,r_i)} | g | $, for all $ i \in \mathbb{N} $</p>
<p>(If $ f \in L^p(\Omega) $ with $ p > 1 $, then I can find such $ g $ via the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function.)</p>
<p>Thank you so much.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/26950/making-sure-that-you-have-comprehended-a-conceptMaking sure that you have comprehended a conceptSoheil Malekzadeh2010-06-03T19:16:03Z2011-09-12T02:28:10Z
<p>Hi,
<br>
I have a question that I've been thinking about for a long time.
<br><br>
How can you assure yourself that you've fully comprehended a concept or the true meaning of a theorem in mathematics?
<br>
I mean how can you realize that you totally get the concept and it's time to move on to the next pages of the book you're reading?
<br><br>
Thanks in advance for your responses.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/13555/a-book-for-problems-in-functional-analysisA book for problems in Functional AnalysisSoheil Malekzadeh2010-01-31T11:28:33Z2010-06-25T10:32:49Z
<p>Hello everybody,</p>
<p>I want to know if there's any book that categorizes problems by subjects of Functional Analysis.
I'm studying Functional Analysis now a days and I really need to solve some problems in order to assure myself that I've really understood the concepts and definitions.
For example: problems related to the Hahn-Banach theorem or Banach Spaces or Hilbert Spaces or ...</p>
<p>Thanks in advance.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/27901/does-cauchy-continuity-imply-uniform-continuity-no/27918#27918Answer by Soheil Malekzadeh for Does Cauchy continuity imply uniform continuity? [No.]Soheil Malekzadeh2010-06-12T09:23:25Z2010-06-12T09:23:25Z<p>No it's not true.</p>
<p>f(x) = x^2 on whole real line.</p>
<p>It maps Cauchy sequences to Cauchy sequences but it's not uniformly continuous on the whole real line.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/20968/rules-for-operator-commutativity/20994#20994Answer by Soheil Malekzadeh for rules for operator commutativity?Soheil Malekzadeh2010-04-11T09:39:59Z2010-04-11T09:39:59Z<p>Hi,
I suppose this book will be useful for you:</p>
<p>Banach Algebra Techniques in Operator Theory (R. Douglas)</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/18794/how-to-start-game-theoryHow to start Game theory?Soheil Malekzadeh2010-03-19T20:42:40Z2010-03-21T03:37:37Z
<p>Hi everybody,</p>
<p>I recently got interested in Game Theory but I don't know where should I start.
Can anyone recommend any references and textbooks?
And what are the prerequisites of Game Thoery?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/11761/why-sin-and-cos-in-the-fourier-seriesWhy sin and cos in the Fourier Series?Soheil Malekzadeh2010-01-14T16:01:07Z2010-03-08T02:42:45Z
<p>Is there any special reason that we use the sines and cosines functions in the Fourier Series, while we know that if we chose any maximal orthonormal system in L2, we would get the same result?
Is it something historical or what?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/7155/famous-mathematical-quotes/11983#11983Answer by Soheil Malekzadeh for Famous mathematical quotesSoheil Malekzadeh2010-01-16T13:50:31Z2010-01-16T13:50:31Z<p>"In mathematics you don't understand things. You just get used to them."</p>
<p>John von Neumann</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/2340/what-is-the-first-interesting-theorem-in-insert-subject-here/11762#11762Answer by Soheil Malekzadeh for What is the first interesting theorem in (insert subject here)?Soheil Malekzadeh2010-01-14T16:10:03Z2010-01-14T16:10:03Z<p>In real analysis, I would say The intermediate value theorem.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/4994/fundamental-examples/11365#11365Answer by Soheil Malekzadeh for Fundamental Examples Soheil Malekzadeh2010-01-10T20:46:57Z2010-01-10T20:46:57Z<p>I suppose the <strong>discrete metric space</strong> is a crucial example in the metric spaces theory and in the introductory mathematical analysis.
It shows many aspects and pathological behavior of metric spaces in general.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/4023/text-for-an-introductory-real-analysis-course/11352#11352Answer by Soheil Malekzadeh for Text for an introductory Real Analysis course.Soheil Malekzadeh2010-01-10T17:21:52Z2010-01-10T20:20:43Z<p>I recommend this book:
Principles of Mathematical Analysis (by W.Rudin)</p>
<p>By studying this book, you're gonna be able to achieve an accurate, as well as, an abstract view of concepts like continuity or Riemann-Stieltjes Integral ...</p>
<p>By the way, Mathematical Analysis (by Tom M.Apostol) is a FANTASTIC book for one who wants to start the course.
I personally taught this book once and the result was great.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/13555/a-book-for-problems-in-functional-analysisComment by Soheil MalekzadehSoheil Malekzadeh2010-06-27T06:39:03Z2010-06-27T06:39:03ZThanks Paul. I have this book and I have to say that it's a fantastic one.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/18794/how-to-start-game-theory/18810#18810Comment by Soheil MalekzadehSoheil Malekzadeh2010-03-22T20:03:24Z2010-03-22T20:03:24ZThank you, your answer was very helpful. Upvoated.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/18794/how-to-start-game-theoryComment by Soheil MalekzadehSoheil Malekzadeh2010-03-19T21:58:39Z2010-03-19T21:58:39ZWhat's wrong with the game theory Georges?http://mathoverflow.net/questions/18794/how-to-start-game-theoryComment by Soheil MalekzadehSoheil Malekzadeh2010-03-19T20:54:23Z2010-03-19T20:54:23ZActually I already did what you said but there were a lot of references and I didn't know which one I should choose.
That's why I came here and asked this question.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/13555/a-book-for-problems-in-functional-analysis/13563#13563Comment by Soheil MalekzadehSoheil Malekzadeh2010-02-11T19:20:13Z2010-02-11T19:20:13ZThis is exactly what I was searching for. Thanks.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/12827/cone-in-a-metric-spaceComment by Soheil MalekzadehSoheil Malekzadeh2010-01-24T20:20:27Z2010-01-24T20:20:27ZI need to define a partial order relation in a metric space via a cone like the real Banach space's case: If P is a cone in a real Banach space, then we have: x <= y iff x-y belongs to P I'm so sorry if my question was not clear.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/12827/cone-in-a-metric-space/12834#12834Comment by Soheil MalekzadehSoheil Malekzadeh2010-01-24T20:18:53Z2010-01-24T20:18:53ZI need to define a partial order relation in a metric space via a cone like the real Banach space's case:
If P is a cone in a real Banach space, then we have:
x <=y iff x-y belongs to P
I'm so sorry if my question was not clear.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/12827/cone-in-a-metric-spaceComment by Soheil MalekzadehSoheil Malekzadeh2010-01-24T07:48:56Z2010-01-24T07:48:56ZActually the feature of a cone that I want to use is that a cone induces a partial ordering relation.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/7155/famous-mathematical-quotes/11983#11983Comment by Soheil MalekzadehSoheil Malekzadeh2010-01-16T14:39:49Z2010-01-16T14:39:49ZOh, I'm so sorry ... I didn't acknowledge ... http://mathoverflow.net/questions/11761/why-sin-and-cos-in-the-fourier-seriesComment by Soheil MalekzadehSoheil Malekzadeh2010-01-14T16:17:46Z2010-01-14T16:17:46ZGot it ... So you're saying that there are reasons beyond the historical ones that make the basis of complex exponentials the preferable one. Thanks a lot my friend. http://mathoverflow.net/questions/11761/why-sin-and-cos-in-the-fourier-seriesComment by Soheil MalekzadehSoheil Malekzadeh2010-01-14T16:06:09Z2010-01-14T16:06:09ZActually by sines and cosines, I had the basis of complex exponentials in my mind.
Thank you.