User x-curious - MathOverflowmost recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-23T23:33:32Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/user/30626http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/127444/when-does-the-sheaf-cohomology-of-a-topological-space-vanishWhen does the sheaf cohomology of a topological space vanish?X-curious2013-04-13T05:28:01Z2013-04-13T17:34:55Z
<p>The question is in the title. A more precise formulation is:</p>
<p>Let $X$ be a topological space. When does $H^i(X,F) = 0$ for all $i > 0$ and <em>all</em> abelian sheaves $F$ on $X$?</p>
<p>The obvious example is a discrete space. I'd be happy with a characterization of compact Hausdorff topological spaces $X$ satisfying the above property.</p>
<p><strong>Edit:</strong> Following Georges Elencwajg's answer, I would like to clarify that these spaces will be quite pathological from the viewpoint of classical topology. Nevertheless, I do not know a single example which does satisfy the above vanishing property and is not discrete. For example, does the Cantor set have this property?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/118834/when-does-the-cotangent-complex-vanishWhen does the cotangent complex vanish?X-curious2013-01-13T17:40:03Z2013-01-16T17:05:58Z
<p>The question is already in the title. Less succinctly, let's call a map $f:X \to Y$ of schemes <em>$L$-trivial</em> if its cotangent complex is quasi-isomorphic to $0$. Such maps have striking deformation-theoretic consequences; for example, any deformation of $Y$ can be followed uniquely by a deformation of $X$. </p>
<p>My primary (and probably naive) question is:</p>
<p>
Is there a classification of $L$-trivial maps?
</p>
<p>I am sure this question has been asked before, but I did not find any literature that deals with it. The three examples of $L$-trivial maps I am familiar with are:</p>
<ul>
<li>Etale morphisms (and these are the <em>only</em> examples under finiteness constraints).</li>
<li>Any map between perfect $\mathbb{F}_p$-schemes.</li>
<li>The inclusion of the closed point in the spectrum of a valuation ring with divisible value group, or similar "divisible" constructions. For example, $\mathrm{Spec}(\mathbb{C}) \hookrightarrow \mathrm{Spec}(\mathbb{C}[ t^{\mathbb{Q}_{\geq 0}}])$ is $L$-trivial.</li>
</ul>
<p>[ <strong>Edit</strong>: I learnt the last one in conversation after positing the first version of this question. ]</p>
<p>More examples can be obtained by taking filtered colimits of the above examples, but those are only slightly different. Hence, a second question is: are there other fundamentally different examples of $L$-trivial maps? </p>
<p>Perhaps a classification is unreasonable to expect, so I am also happy to learn more about $L$-trivial maps in other geometric categories, like algebraic stacks, or derived/spectral schemes/stacks, or (complex/rigid) analytic spaces, etc.. In particular, I am especially curious to know if $L$-trivial maps can be better understood using derived algebraic geometry. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/127444/when-does-the-sheaf-cohomology-of-a-topological-space-vanishComment by X-curiousX-curious2013-04-13T23:38:00Z2013-04-13T23:38:00ZThanks! If you write this as an answer, I would be happy to accept it.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/127444/when-does-the-sheaf-cohomology-of-a-topological-space-vanish/127457#127457Comment by X-curiousX-curious2013-04-13T17:30:17Z2013-04-13T17:30:17ZThanks for these examples! I should have said that I realize these examples will be "pathological" (and typically very disconnected), and was hoping for some result along the lines that there aren't very many of them besides discrete sets. I will clarify this in the question.
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/118834/when-does-the-cotangent-complex-vanish/118866#118866Comment by X-curiousX-curious2013-01-14T11:19:39Z2013-01-14T11:19:39ZAh, thanks. This observation strongly supports the (well-advertised) point of view that a simplicial commutative ring is just a ring with additional "nilpotent" data. It also raises the following question: if $A \to B$ is an $L$-trivial map of ordinary rings that is additionally an isomorphism modulo nilpotents, then is $A \simeq B$?http://mathoverflow.net/questions/118834/when-does-the-cotangent-complex-vanishComment by X-curiousX-curious2013-01-13T18:36:57Z2013-01-13T18:36:57ZYes for the second question about finitely presented maps (as I indicated parenthetically in the question), but I am interested in the general case. I do not think $L$-trivial maps are the same as formally etale maps; the latter only corresponds to the vanishing of the first couple of cohomology sheaves of the cotangent complex, and I see no reason why this implies vanishing of the full complex without additional strong finiteness assumptions (like Quillen's conjecture proven by Avramov), but maybe I am missing something simpler?