User changyu guo - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net 2013-05-25T13:30:44Z http://mathoverflow.net/feeds/user/26608 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdf http://mathoverflow.net/questions/115504/is-there-any-known-condition-for-the-following-property Is there any known condition for the following property? Changyu Guo 2012-12-05T14:48:25Z 2012-12-07T09:12:50Z <p>For a mapping $f: \Omega\to \bf{R}^n$, what kind of condition ensures that the one-dimensional Hausdorff measure of $f^{-1}(E)$ is zero whenever $E$ is of zero one-dimensional Hausdorff measure zero. Note that f is not assumed to be a homeomorphism. </p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/110911/books-about-capacity-theory/111155#111155 Answer by Changyu Guo for Books about Capacity theory Changyu Guo 2012-11-01T13:05:15Z 2012-11-01T13:05:15Z <p>Maz'ya's book contains a fruitful treatment of Capacity and Weighted capacity and its relation with Sobolev spaces theory, in particular the (weighted) Sobolev inequality or Poincare inequality. Heinonen's book contains the treatment of modulus and capacity in metric setting. </p> <ol> <li>Maz'ya, Vladimir Sobolev spaces with applications to elliptic partial differential equations. Second, revised and augmented edition. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], 342. Springer, Heidelberg, 2011. xxviii+866 pp.</li> </ol> <p>2.Heinonen, Juha Lectures on analysis on metric spaces. Universitext. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001. x+140 pp.</p> <p>3.Heinonen, Juha; Kilpeläinen, Tero; Martio, Olli Nonlinear potential theory of degenerate elliptic equations. Unabridged republication of the 1993 original. Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, NY, 2006. xii+404 pp.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/56813/applications-of-the-notion-of-of-gromov-hausdorff-distance/110071#110071 Answer by Changyu Guo for Applications of the notion of of Gromov-Hausdorff distance Changyu Guo 2012-10-19T07:19:57Z 2012-10-19T07:19:57Z <p>Stephen Keith used the Gromov-Hausdorff convergence to study the existence of (measurable) differentiable structure on metric measure spaces that supports a Poincare inequality or K-Lip-lip condition. </p> <p>Juha Heinonen, Jeff Cheeger and Stephen keith also used this method as a standard blow up argument in related questions. </p> <p>Heinonen, Juha; Keith, Stephen Flat forms, bi-Lipschitz parameterizations, and smoothability of manifolds. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. No. 113 (2011), 1–37. </p> <p>Keith, Stephen A differentiable structure for metric measure spaces. Adv. Math. 183 (2004), no. 2, 271–315.</p> <p>J. Cheeger, Differentiability of Lipschitz functions on metric measure spaces, Geom. Funct. Anal. 9 (3) (1999) 428–517.</p> <p>J. Cheeger, T.H. Colding, On the structure of spaces with Ricci curvature bounded below. I, II, III, J. Differential Geom. </p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/109439/is-there-a-criterion-for-a-map-to-be-a-local-homeomorphis Is there a criterion for a map to be a local homeomorphis? Changyu Guo 2012-10-12T07:52:12Z 2012-10-12T07:52:12Z <p>Is there a known criterion for a map to be a local homeomorphism or a.e. local homeomorphism? </p> <p>Of course, we may add some topological assumptions or analytic assumptions for the mapping, e.g. sense-preserving (means that the local index/degree is positive), discrete (means the fiber of the map is totally disconnected), open (means that it maps open set to open set). It seems that proper analytic assumptions are needed as we know that (non-constant) analytic map in the plane are local homeomorphism.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/108904/on-differentiability-relative-to-a-n-rectifiable-subset-of-mathbbrn On differentiability relative to a n-rectifiable subset of \mathbb{R^N} Changyu Guo 2012-10-05T11:58:35Z 2012-10-11T10:03:10Z <p>Let S be a n-rectifiable subset of \mathbb{R}^N , we define the differentiability of a funtion f:S \to \mathbb{R} at a point x_0 in S as in Federer's book, where he called differentiable relative to S at x_0. <strong>Are there any known condition to ensure that f is differentiable relative to S at H^n-a.e. points in S?</strong></p> <p>Here we suppose that S is equipped with a metric d such that it is Ahlfors n-regular in Hausdorff measure, meaning that the Hausdorff n-measure of balls with radius r in S is comparable to r^n. That is, We may view S itself as an n-regular n-rectifiable metric measure space.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/108904/on-differentiability-relative-to-a-n-rectifiable-subset-of-mathbbrn/109367#109367 Answer by Changyu Guo for On differentiability relative to a n-rectifiable subset of \mathbb{R^N} Changyu Guo 2012-10-11T10:03:10Z 2012-10-11T10:03:10Z <p>I found some results on this topic, except Federer's book "geometric measure theory", </p> <ol> <li><p>Ambrosio, Luigi; Kirchheim, Bernd Rectifiable sets in metric and Banach spaces. Math. Ann. 318 (2000), no. 3, 527–555.</p></li> <li><p>Keith, Stephen Measurable differentiable structures and the Poincaré inequality. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 53 (2004), no. 4, 1127–1150.</p></li> </ol> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/109116/a-closed-connected-component-in-a-topological-space-does-not-contain-any-path-con A closed connected component in a topological space does not contain any path-connected subset? Changyu Guo 2012-10-08T06:25:08Z 2012-10-08T12:30:57Z <p>Does there exist such a non-trivial closed connected component U of some connected topological space X or a non-trivial connected topological space X that do not contain any non-trivial path-connected subset.</p> <p>The answer is negative if the space is assumed to be connected and locally path-connected. Since every component of a connected and locally path-connected space is path connected.</p> <p>Added after some useful comments: If we assume that the space X is actually a metric space (together with the metric topology), then can it possible to contain non-trivial path-connected subset. Note that i assume that any component of the metric space X is non-trivial (not a point).</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/100317/rellich-kondrachov-compactness-theorem-in-arbitrary-smooth-metric-measure-spaces/108521#108521 Answer by Changyu Guo for Rellich-Kondrachov compactness theorem in arbitrary smooth metric measure spaces Changyu Guo 2012-10-01T06:59:59Z 2012-10-01T06:59:59Z <p>Please take a look at Theorem 8.1 (Chapter 8) in the following paper Hajłasz, Piotr; Koskela, Pekka Sobolev met Poincaré. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 145 (2000), no. 688, x+101 pp. </p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/108315/can-we-extend-a-a-e-lipschitz-map-defined-on-a-closed-subset-of-brn-to-the-who Can we extend a a.e. Lipschitz map defined on a closed subset of \bR^N to the whole space such that it is still a.e. Lipschitz Changyu Guo 2012-09-28T06:03:06Z 2012-09-28T22:03:02Z <p>I have the following question: If $A$ is a metrically oriented $n$-dimensional subset of $\mathbb{R}^N$ and $f$ is a continuous map from $A$ to $\mathbb{R}^M$ . We know that $\mathrm{Lip} f &lt; +\infty$ $L^N$-almost everywhere, can we then continuously extends f to the whole $\mathbb{R}^N$ such that $\mathrm{Lip} f &lt; +\infty$ $L^N$-almost everywhere? Here $\mathrm{Lip}$ is the local lipschitz constant of $f$.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/10066/conformal-maps-in-higher-dimensions/108333#108333 Answer by Changyu Guo for Conformal maps in higher dimensions Changyu Guo 2012-09-28T11:39:47Z 2012-09-28T11:39:47Z <p>I think this is a good reference for it. Iwaniec, Tadeusz; Martin, Gaven Geometric function theory and non-linear analysis. Oxford Mathematical Monographs. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 2001. xvi+552.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/81334/a-fact-of-quasiconformal-map/108316#108316 Answer by Changyu Guo for A Fact Of Quasiconformal Map Changyu Guo 2012-09-28T06:13:54Z 2012-09-28T06:13:54Z <p>A simple way is the use the modulus of curve family argument, see Väisälä's book lecture notes on n-dimensional quasiconformal mappings.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/115504/is-there-any-known-condition-for-the-following-property Comment by Changyu Guo Changyu Guo 2012-12-06T08:11:07Z 2012-12-06T08:11:07Z Yes, you are right. It is better to use the Hausdorff measure H^1. \Omega is a domain in \bR^n and f is not necessarily to be a homeomorphism here. http://mathoverflow.net/questions/106933/borel-sets-preserved-under-open-maps Comment by Changyu Guo Changyu Guo 2012-10-12T06:26:07Z 2012-10-12T06:26:07Z You need injectivity for the mapping f. http://mathoverflow.net/questions/109364/when-is-a-locally-homeo-a-covering-map/109373#109373 Comment by Changyu Guo Changyu Guo 2012-10-11T12:45:05Z 2012-10-11T12:45:05Z could you please point out where is the reference for the above-mentioned result for surfaces? http://mathoverflow.net/questions/109116/a-closed-connected-component-in-a-topological-space-does-not-contain-any-path-con Comment by Changyu Guo Changyu Guo 2012-10-08T09:14:16Z 2012-10-08T09:14:16Z To Mark Grant: thanks for your reminder. I should also say that the connected component U or the space X in question is also non-trivial. http://mathoverflow.net/questions/109116/a-closed-connected-component-in-a-topological-space-does-not-contain-any-path-con Comment by Changyu Guo Changyu Guo 2012-10-08T08:38:41Z 2012-10-08T08:38:41Z To Goldstern: what do you mean by countable connected space? Is it a subclass of connected topological space? http://mathoverflow.net/questions/109116/a-closed-connected-component-in-a-topological-space-does-not-contain-any-path-con Comment by Changyu Guo Changyu Guo 2012-10-08T08:34:59Z 2012-10-08T08:34:59Z To Mark Grant: Yes, i should add non-trivial path-connected subset- http://mathoverflow.net/questions/108315/can-we-extend-a-a-e-lipschitz-map-defined-on-a-closed-subset-of-brn-to-the-who/108320#108320 Comment by Changyu Guo Changyu Guo 2012-10-01T08:15:32Z 2012-10-01T08:15:32Z Thanks. I will take a look at the paper. http://mathoverflow.net/questions/108315/can-we-extend-a-a-e-lipschitz-map-defined-on-a-closed-subset-of-brn-to-the-who Comment by Changyu Guo Changyu Guo 2012-09-28T06:27:42Z 2012-09-28T06:27:42Z To &quot;Ricky Demer&quot;: the term &quot;metrically oriented&quot; is from J.Heinonen and S.Rickman's paper &quot;Geometric branched covers between generalized manifolds. Duke Math. J. 113 (2002)&quot;, it basically says that as A itself is a very good metric measurable space with n-dimensional Hausdorff measure (e.g. supports a (1,1)-Poincare inequality, n-Ahlfors regular, n-rectifiable), so Lipf&lt;\infty L^n-a.e. means that as a metric measure space itself, Lipf is finite in Hausdorff n-measure a.e.. When you extend this map f, then f is defined on R^N which the corresponding measure should be L^N. http://mathoverflow.net/questions/108315/can-we-extend-a-a-e-lipschitz-map-defined-on-a-closed-subset-of-brn-to-the-who Comment by Changyu Guo Changyu Guo 2012-09-28T06:10:47Z 2012-09-28T06:10:47Z Of course one can use the Tietze extension theorem to extend f continuously to the whole space. The problem then is that whether it keeps the a.e. finiteness of the Lipf.