User ramón barral - MathOverflowmost recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-06-20T07:37:24Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/user/26252http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/42512/awfully-sophisticated-proof-for-simple-facts/111930#111930Answer by Ramón Barral for Awfully sophisticated proof for simple factsRamón Barral2012-11-09T19:32:14Z2012-11-09T19:32:14Z<p>Seen on <a href="http://legauss.blogspot.com.es/2012/05/para-rir-ou-para-chorar-parte-13.html" rel="nofollow">http://legauss.blogspot.com.es/2012/05/para-rir-ou-para-chorar-parte-13.html</a></p>
<p>Theorem: $5!/2$ is even.</p>
<p>Proof: $5!/2$ is the order of the group $A_5$. It is known that $A_5$ is a non-abelian simple group. Therefore $A_5$ is not solvable. But the Feit-Thompson Theorem asserts that every finite group with odd cardinal is solvable, so $5!/2$ must be an even number.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/107876/sigma-compactness-in-furstenberg-paperSigma-compactness in Furstenberg paperRamón Barral2012-09-23T02:28:34Z2012-09-23T02:28:34Z
<p>I've been reading the classical Furstenberg paper "The structure of distal flows", where the author claims he is working with an arbitrary locally compact group $T$. Nevertheless, the proof of Lemma $5.1$ actually requires that $T$ is $\sigma$-compact. I am not aware of any proof about locally compact groups acting distally on compact metric spaces being $\sigma$-compact.</p>
<p>The question is: is there such a proof, or does this mean his theorems about quasi-isometric flow have a lesser degree of generality?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/106497/non-trivial-vector-bundle-over-non-paracompact-contractible-spaceNon trivial vector bundle over non-paracompact contractible spaceRamón Barral2012-09-06T11:06:24Z2012-09-07T15:09:14Z
<p>The proof that the set of classes of vector bundles is homotopy invariant relies on the paracompactness and the Hausdorff property of the base space. Are there any known examples of:</p>
<p>Non trivial vector bundles over a paracompact non-Hausdorff contractible space</p>
<p>Non trivial vector bundles over a Hausdorff non-paracompact contractible space</p>
<p>Non trivial vector bundles over a non-Hausdorff non-paracompact contractible space</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/106497/non-trivial-vector-bundle-over-non-paracompact-contractible-space/106563#106563Comment by Ramón BarralRamón Barral2012-09-07T13:15:56Z2012-09-07T13:15:56ZThanks for your answer. This also deals with the non-paracompact non-Hausdorff case, using a suitable wedge sum with the trivial bundle over a non-paracompact contractible space, so only the Hausdorff non-paracompact case remains without an example.