User myron moses jackson - MathOverflowmost recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-06-19T03:15:03Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/user/25652http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/24579/convergence-of-sumn3-sin2n-1/104525#104525Comment by Myron Moses JacksonMyron Moses Jackson2012-08-11T23:57:13Z2012-08-11T23:57:13ZIndeed, Trevor! I agree. That is refreshing to hear. If you are philosopher and you need to understand where Whitehead is coming from, where should you go? Thinking that I should ask math people about this was my intention because I need to get this down for my students. It might have been a bad idea but I really have to rely on other experts to fill me in regarding these areas of expertise. I hope you understand where I am coming from on this matter.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/24579/convergence-of-sumn3-sin2n-1/104525#104525Comment by Myron Moses JacksonMyron Moses Jackson2012-08-11T23:40:56Z2012-08-11T23:40:56ZBeing a mathematician does not justify intelligent stupidity. Several of my colleagues do math and have taught me a lot. But only a few have came off this narrow and ideological. Mathematics deals with harmonies and relations and should not be used as an escapism to deal with the paradoxes and freedom of the world. You don't have the right to prohibit questioning and to go against the ethos of science in its openness!http://mathoverflow.net/questions/24579/convergence-of-sumn3-sin2n-1/104525#104525Comment by Myron Moses JacksonMyron Moses Jackson2012-08-11T23:34:55Z2012-08-11T23:34:55ZYuuup, the site is fascinating! It's the same crap with regards to the blog police. How do you know which questions are not acceptable. Whitehead was the author of the 3 volumes of the Principia and Russell's teacher. He was a mathematician before coming to Harvard to teach philosophy, so the notion that these issues are not acceptable to your site seems pretty shallow! This is one of the most dynamic and humblest minds known to humanity. His most sold work is the "Shilling shocker" entitled Introduction to Mathematics. It's awesome. I'm just asking for people to broaden their horizonshttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/24579/convergence-of-sumn3-sin2n-1/104525#104525Comment by Myron Moses JacksonMyron Moses Jackson2012-08-11T23:26:51Z2012-08-11T23:26:51ZIt's sad that you think you already know where and how everything already fits together! Unfortunately, I don't believe that so I'm very naughty. Vague relations are some of the most enlightening and important. You really have made your self a slave to a small world, now why do I have to lock myself up in your prison? I wish everything went together as nicely as you pretend. Mathematical exactness is a mirror of how the world would be if it were boring and impoverished! That's why you keep parroting the same crap!http://mathoverflow.net/questions/24579/convergence-of-sumn3-sin2n-1/104525#104525Comment by Myron Moses JacksonMyron Moses Jackson2012-08-11T23:19:49Z2012-08-11T23:19:49ZI just had some questions that were mathematical in nature, so I'm trying to learn and collaborate--not take personal jabs at people. I teach, but a good teacher is ready to learn not just hear themselves talk all day. I'm sorry you're so self-absorbed!http://mathoverflow.net/questions/24579/convergence-of-sumn3-sin2n-1/104525#104525Comment by Myron Moses JacksonMyron Moses Jackson2012-08-11T23:03:33Z2012-08-11T23:03:33ZAnd I'm sure you already know which questions don't count and those that do. Some of the most important findings in the history of mathematics were considered errors, or unimportant, or whatever. Obviously, we have a lot to learn.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/24579/convergence-of-sumn3-sin2n-1/104525#104525Comment by Myron Moses JacksonMyron Moses Jackson2012-08-11T22:58:04Z2012-08-11T22:58:04ZThanks, dogg!!!http://mathoverflow.net/questions/104517/cosmological-truth-and-the-theory-of-cosmic-epochsComment by Myron Moses JacksonMyron Moses Jackson2012-08-11T22:43:48Z2012-08-11T22:43:48Zmistaken! I don't need to impress you and come off "high-tech". But you might wanna step your game up and learn some new vocabulary. I've had to do so with math over the last four years. I know it would be nice to just talk amongst ourselves but eventually you have to come out into the uncanny. I didn't make these rules, it's life...lolhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/77074/two-cardinal-diamond-principles-and-saturation-of-the-nonstationary-ideal/104521#104521Comment by Myron Moses JacksonMyron Moses Jackson2012-08-11T22:22:37Z2012-08-11T22:22:37ZSo it comes off as false advertising when I see a section about philosophical logic and mathematics. I read that valuable section of the site before posting, so I'm confused. You might want to take that down or let folks know that you aren't really entertaining those questions despite the appearance otherwise. It is troubling to me that you have all these issues with my posts, yet that is on the site and it's clear that you are addressing these disciplines as related to mathematical research. So recognize that I seen that! It's tough to see how these areas aren't interrelated!!http://mathoverflow.net/questions/77074/two-cardinal-diamond-principles-and-saturation-of-the-nonstationary-ideal/104521#104521Comment by Myron Moses JacksonMyron Moses Jackson2012-08-11T21:57:24Z2012-08-11T21:57:24ZSure don't! Technically, you're pretty stationary...lolhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/104517/cosmological-truth-and-the-theory-of-cosmic-epochsComment by Myron Moses JacksonMyron Moses Jackson2012-08-11T21:46:00Z2012-08-11T21:46:00ZFair enough, but respectfully your interests come off small and it's unfortunate you can't see the importance of interconnections of things which I think enriches philosophy and mathematics. I don't wee how you putting up these roadblocks is even healthy to your own stability? I can't just interpret something mathematically and believe I can ignore or exhaust all of its meanings. You lost me!http://mathoverflow.net/questions/77074/two-cardinal-diamond-principles-and-saturation-of-the-nonstationary-ideal/104521#104521Comment by Myron Moses JacksonMyron Moses Jackson2012-08-11T21:41:56Z2012-08-11T21:41:56ZI know where philosophy blogs are but how does philosophy not relate to everything. It's not an MhD but a PhD for philosophy so I can't be narrowly ideological like this site promotes. You might be struggling to see out of your own cubbyhole. Doesn't mathematics relate to things in this general way, also?? How are you advancing what your doing by talking amongst your small circle. Broaden your horizons and mind and you might break out of being a slave to rules and this massive conformism you pushin', homie! I resist your close mindedness, respectfully!http://mathoverflow.net/questions/104517/cosmological-truth-and-the-theory-of-cosmic-epochsComment by Myron Moses JacksonMyron Moses Jackson2012-08-11T21:34:51Z2012-08-11T21:34:51ZI'm thinking about the problems and their mathematical implications. Not trying to play high school! This blog claims to be open but it seems very controlling and you always got the rules handy. Do you have to live in fear while running a blog too??? Very sad!http://mathoverflow.net/questions/77074/two-cardinal-diamond-principles-and-saturation-of-the-nonstationary-ideal/104521#104521Comment by Myron Moses JacksonMyron Moses Jackson2012-08-11T21:29:43Z2012-08-11T21:29:43ZI posted legitimate questions and people just shot them down, didn't even address them. Unfortunately, many of your bloggers have trouble respecting others and so I don't see how you expect me to be treated like this. Your house was very unwelcoming which is not how it is advertised online when I found out about it. I'm taking on anti-intellectuals who think their shit don't stink. My concerns were justified and mathematically oriented but this blog has a habit of blowing people off if you can't address a question. You approach learning as if it were balkenized and in little cookiecuttershttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/104517/cosmological-truth-and-the-theory-of-cosmic-epochsComment by Myron Moses JacksonMyron Moses Jackson2012-08-11T21:08:15Z2012-08-11T21:08:15ZYeah Whitehead believed what you're talking about, but then he broke with Russell and gave up this ideological dogma. Even the metaphysical propositions that condition the experiences are open to variations and self-determinations that exceed any predictability. Essentially, he gave trying to live in your boring universe and traded it in for a world of novelty where everything is moving in a creative advance. The universe you are imagining will dull the imagination and the spark of creativity crucial to the mathematics. Thanks