User - MathOverflowmost recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-26T00:36:50Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/user/25205http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/102537/representations-of-the-lorentz-group-in-4-dimensionsrepresentations of the Lorentz group in 4 dimensionselelias22012-07-18T13:05:29Z2012-07-18T15:37:08Z
<p>Hi,</p>
<p>First of all I should say I am quite uneducated in group theory, so my question can be very naive. Sorry about that.</p>
<p>I'm reading Srednicki's "Quantum Field Theory" and I have a bit of trouble understanding how one can label Lorentz representations as two different su(2) algebras.</p>
<p>In particular, with the definitions:</p>
<p>$J_i = \frac{1}{2} \epsilon_{ijk} M^{jk}$ ;
$K_i = M^{i0}$</p>
<p>where $M$ are the generators of the Lorentz group, one can build:</p>
<p>$N_i = \frac{1}{2}(J_i - iK_{i})$</p>
<p>$N^{\dagger}_i = \frac{1}{2}(J_i + iK_{i})$</p>
<p>so that, in terms of the Ns:</p>
<p>$[N_i,N_j] = i\epsilon_{ijk}N_k$</p>
<p>$[N_i^{\dagger},N_j^{\dagger}] = i\epsilon_{ijk}N_k^{\dagger}$</p>
<p>$[N_i,N_j^{\dagger}] = 0$</p>
<p>now there are two su(2) representations that do not mix with each other. </p>
<p>However, I cannot see how one can have, simultaneously, different dimensions for the two representations since they are obtained from the very same matrices. For example:</p>
<p>$J_i = N_i + N_i^{\dagger}$, </p>
<p>which seems to imply that both Ns have to be matrices of the same dimension. </p>
<p>Thanks a lot.</p>