User - MathOverflowmost recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-21T10:22:15Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/user/23964http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/126850/gram-series-for-more-general-integralsGram series for more general integralsunknown (yahoo)2013-04-08T13:06:27Z2013-04-08T13:06:27Z
<p>given the Gram series</p>
<p>$$ \pi (x) \sim \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n}\frac{log^{n}(x)}{n!\zeta (n+1)} $$</p>
<p>can this result be generalized to more integral transforms ?</p>
<p>$$ g(x)= \int_{0}^{\infty}dyK(xy)f(y)dy $$</p>
<p>for exapmle in Gramm series for the prime counting function the integral equation is</p>
<p>$$ log\zeta(s)= s\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{e^{xy}-1}\pi(e^{y})dy $$</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/126839/numerical-evaluation-of-a-triple-integral-can-be-madeNumerical evaluation of a triple integral can be made ?unknown (yahoo)2013-04-08T11:14:56Z2013-04-08T11:14:56Z
<p>let be the integral</p>
<p>$$ \int_{0}^{\infty}dx\int_{0}^{\infty}dy\int_{0}^{\infty}dz \frac{f(x,y,z)}{(1+x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2})^{s}} $$</p>
<p>here $ s $ is a parameter so the integral converges</p>
<p>now let us make the change to polar coordinates , however the function $ f(x,y,z) $ will not be invariant under rotations so there will be an extra integration over the angular variables</p>
<p>$$ \int_{\Omega} d \Omega \int_{0}^{\infty}r^{2}f(r, \Omega )(1+r^{2})^{-s} $$</p>
<p>my question is can we ALWAYS integrate with Numerical (MOnte carlo method) inside the angular variables $ \int_{\Omega}d \Omega $ so we are left only with a sum of one dimensional integrals ??</p>
<p>$$ \sum_{i} \int_{0}^{\infty}dr f(r, \Omega _{i})r^{2}(1+r^{2})^{-s}. $$</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/116690/bessel-function-with-complex-argument-and-indexBessel function with complex argument and indexunknown (yahoo)2012-12-18T10:03:32Z2012-12-18T10:03:32Z
<p>let be a Bessel function $ J_{u} (x) $</p>
<p>if both the index 'u' and the argument 'x' are complex</p>
<p>$$ J_{ia}(ib) $$</p>
<p>for real 'a' and 'b' what is then the name for this function ??</p>
<p>if only the index is complex $ J_{ia}(b) $ or the argumentis complex $ J_{a}(ib) $</p>
<p>what is the name of this function ??</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/103926/how-can-i-solve-a-boundary-value-numerically-on-an-infinite-intervalhow can i solve a boundary value numerically on an infinite interval ??unknown (yahoo)2012-08-04T09:36:31Z2012-08-05T21:08:08Z
<p>let be the differential equation $ -y''(x)+x^{4}y(x)-E_{n}y(x)=0 $ with the boundary conditions $ y(0)=0=y(\infty) $</p>
<p>how could i use the shooting method or other numerical method to solve this equation ? , my only idea is to set $ R=10000 $ for example and solve $ y(0)=0=y(R) $</p>
<p>of course i also could made the substitution $ u= \frac{x}{x-1} $ so the new boundary conditions could become $ y(0)=0=y(1) $ but know the differential equation would be singular at the point $ u=1 $</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/127122/taylor-series-in-lgox-for-the-square-rootComment by 2013-04-11T11:37:13Z2013-04-11T11:37:13Zoh sorry tehn Ben if possible erase teh questio please :)http://mathoverflow.net/questions/126839/numerical-evaluation-of-a-triple-integral-can-be-madeComment by 2013-04-10T11:00:13Z2013-04-10T11:00:13Zmy idea is to change to polar coordinates :) and then to apply numerical integration ONLY to the angular variables so we are left with a set of ONE dimensional integral in the form $ \int_{0}^{\infty}drr^{n-1}f(r, \Omega _{i} ) $http://mathoverflow.net/questions/126839/numerical-evaluation-of-a-triple-integral-can-be-madeComment by 2013-04-08T19:01:55Z2013-04-08T19:01:55Zmy question was about if my numerical method is correct
a) change to polar coordinates
b) numerical integration ONLY over the angular variables.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/120017/why-mathematicians-do-not-accept-the-wu-sprung-semiclassical-model-as-a-solutionComment by 2013-01-27T13:47:03Z2013-01-27T13:47:03Z<a href="http://mathdl.maa.org/images/upload_library/22/Ford/JosephKeller.pdf" rel="nofollow">mathdl.maa.org/images/upload_library/22/Ford/…</a>
inverse problems in physics..
see form equation (6.1) we can get the inverse of the potentia $ f^{-1}(x) $ from the eigenvalue staircase in this case the staricase is the Riemann zeta functionhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/120017/why-mathematicians-do-not-accept-the-wu-sprung-semiclassical-model-as-a-solutionComment by 2013-01-27T13:41:02Z2013-01-27T13:41:02ZHua Wu and D. W. L. Sprung, "Riemann zeta and a fractal potential", Physical Review E 48 (1993) 2595.
Fractal fits to Riemann zeros P B Slater, Canadian Journal of Physics, 2007, 85(4): 345–357, 10.1139/p07-050 http://mathoverflow.net/questions/34699/approaches-to-riemann-hypothesis-using-methods-outside-number-theory/112070#112070Comment by 2012-11-12T13:06:15Z2012-11-12T13:06:15Zas far as i know an operator of the form $ -D^{2}+f(x) $ has only Real Eigenvalues doesn't it ? , of course as a phsyicist i could be wrong :D , look on the web WU-SPRUNG potential PHYSICS OF THE RIEMANN HYPOTHESIS and similar questions or simply use a computer to get the eigenvalues to see i am righthttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/34699/approaches-to-riemann-hypothesis-using-methods-outside-number-theory/112070#112070Comment by 2012-11-11T14:48:38Z2012-11-11T14:48:38Zthe idea is that using WKB method , or semiclassical theory , look at this <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_quantum_theory" rel="nofollow">en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_quantum_theory</a> one could get a Hamiltonian with a density of states given by the Riemann Weil formula and whose energies are the Riemann Zeros
the potential is given implicitly of coursehttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/111809/how-to-deal-with-divergent-fourier-seriesComment by 2012-11-08T16:07:33Z2012-11-08T16:07:33Zgiven any 'x' positive i would like to find a method to sum the divergent series with $ a=1/2$ or with a a real number on the interval $ (0,1) $