most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net 2013-05-23T05:55:57Z http://mathoverflow.net/feeds/user/21268 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdf http://mathoverflow.net/questions/71725/restricted-three-body-problem/116810#116810 Jamahl Peavey 2012-12-19T19:22:52Z 2013-03-18T17:24:20Z

<p>2-Body Problems also exist which have no specific solution such that there is a range of solutions for a given physical condition. This means solvability is not based on the number of bodies but the state and representation of space.</p> <p>Indian Journal of Science and Technology published a physical proof called, “Binary Precession Solutions based on Synchronized Field Couplings”</p> <p><a href="http://www.indjst.org/index.php/indjst/article/view/30008/25962" rel="nofollow">http://www.indjst.org/index.php/indjst/article/view/30008/25962</a></p> <p>In this research, a generalized wave function with classical characteristics was isolated within the motion of binary stars. The wave function provided the first tool for cracking the complex motion of DI Herculis and other binary stars that had several measured precession solutions.</p> <p><a href="http://xxx.lanl.gov/pdf/1111.3328v2.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://xxx.lanl.gov/pdf/1111.3328v2.pdf</a></p> <p>In this research, published about a year after the Indian Journal of Science and Technology publication, mathematicians from Imperial College London produced a proof for the physical existence of wave functions. The research was published in Nature Magazine.</p>

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/116531/the-unreasonable-effectiveness-of-physics-in-mathematics-why-what-how-to-catch/118302#118302 Jamahl Peavey 2013-01-07T19:21:26Z 2013-01-07T19:21:26Z

<p>Physicist can build mathematical or mechanical models to describe a system. It is really a matter of choice. Mechanical models use mathematics but the processes and transformations describing the system are highly visual. Mathematicians are shaping physics. Mathematician’s influence on physics became profound during the 1920’s with the birth of modern quantum mechanics. Hilbert, Born, Heisenberg, Dirac and others produced mathematical models for quantum mechanics that are inherently abstract. This abstractness was not the norm prior to the 1920’s. Mechanical models were the preferred tools of physicist because in these models, processes and transformations are not abstract and can be manipulated to build new technologies. Mathematical models describe systems but what is actually occurring as it relates to processes and transformations is unclear and does not lend itself very well to manipulation at the deepest levels. Physicist can only bring new insights to geometry because unlike other branches of mathematics, geometry is talking about something real (space). Space is real and not abstract. Witten is smart and so are many other individuals who have failed to give any new testable insights into how real space works beyond Einstein.</p>

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/89414/does-godels-incompletenss-theorem-mean-there-is-no-solution-to-hilberts-6th-pro Jamahl Peavey 2012-02-24T15:47:40Z 2012-02-24T16:22:54Z

<p>If the stated question is true then what are the consequencies to mathematical physics as an aspect of Hilbert's 6th Problem.</p>

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/31789/statistical-physics-of-string-theory/88530#88530 Jamahl Peavey 2012-02-15T16:39:33Z 2012-02-15T16:39:33Z

<p>Quantum Statistics and Classical Statistic are quite different. Electromagnetic Field Theory and Thermodynamics uses statistics of a classical deterministic kind. Sting Theory is a quantum mechanical theory of gravity which has not been proven so with respect to reality we do not know what it represents. Quantum mechanical theories us a statistics that is based on wave function normalization or distributions. The system is consider indeterminate until measurements are taken.</p>

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/48671/examples-of-non-rigorous-but-efficient-mathematical-methods-in-physics/88526#88526 Jamahl Peavey 2012-02-15T16:26:11Z 2012-02-15T16:26:11Z

<p>Yang-Mills Equations are experimentally proven but have no strong mathematical foundations. In the Clay Mathematics Institute the mass gap problem is worth one million dollars.</p>

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/122696/is-there-a-mathematical-name-for-a-relationship-with-the-following-characteristic Jamahl Peavey 2013-02-27T18:27:33Z 2013-02-27T18:27:33Z

@Gerry Myerson: I went to the post and they said it was removed by author. I don't remember removing anything. Can you repost? Thank You.

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/122979/does-newtons-first-law-have-a-topological-proof Jamahl Peavey 2013-02-27T16:45:40Z 2013-02-27T16:45:40Z

What does it mean to have reputation and ethics? Grigori Yakovlevich Perelman

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/122979/does-newtons-first-law-have-a-topological-proof Jamahl Peavey 2013-02-26T19:19:23Z 2013-02-26T19:19:23Z

Geometrically, circles and squares are different but topologically they are the same because one can become the other without cutting. A mathematician with respect for the spirit of the question and the character of a teacher can restate the question accurately whereby it is available for others to answer. That is reputation beyond my 31 and the combined 58,683 that closed the question. How many reputation points is the biggest problem in physics worth? I'd say its worth more than 3 million easy. We are all here to learn and share as best we can.

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/122979/does-newtons-first-law-have-a-topological-proof Jamahl Peavey 2013-02-26T14:14:09Z 2013-02-26T14:14:09Z

How is it not a real question?

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/122696/is-there-a-mathematical-name-for-a-relationship-with-the-following-characteristic Jamahl Peavey 2013-02-25T05:07:33Z 2013-02-25T05:07:33Z

@Ryan Budney,you asked for a reference which I thought you wanted to make the question more concrete. The equations are clear and the question is clear. This is a pure mathematical question and I asked for help and this what I get. Wow.

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/122696/is-there-a-mathematical-name-for-a-relationship-with-the-following-characteristic Jamahl Peavey 2013-02-23T13:12:57Z 2013-02-23T13:12:57Z

If there is an answer to this question, someone else will have to say it is correct because this is not my area of expertise. I can just accept what the relationship is said to represent.

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/122696/is-there-a-mathematical-name-for-a-relationship-with-the-following-characteristic Jamahl Peavey 2013-02-23T13:00:18Z 2013-02-23T13:00:18Z

@Ryan Budney: Equations 8,9,10,11 exist within a conditional platform for field relocation. The minimum and maximum amplitudes are functions of &quot;n&quot; which are whole numbers. This produces the discreteness in the trigonometric forms.

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/122696/is-there-a-mathematical-name-for-a-relationship-with-the-following-characteristic Jamahl Peavey 2013-02-23T12:47:10Z 2013-02-23T12:47:10Z

<a href="http://www.indjst.org/archive/vol.4.issue.4/apr11jamal-5.pdf" rel="nofollow">indjst.org/archive/vol.4.issue.4/apr11jamal-5.pdf</a> I will remove the document immediately if including it in comment section is considered a spam.

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/122595/is-general-relativity-the-only-example-of-a-real-non-euclidean-geometry Jamahl Peavey 2013-02-22T14:42:45Z 2013-02-22T14:42:45Z

Thank You. To my knowledge Spherical Geometry was know before Non- Euclidean Geometry was discovered and it was not really considered Non-Euclidean.

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/122595/is-general-relativity-the-only-example-of-a-real-non-euclidean-geometry Jamahl Peavey 2013-02-22T04:20:59Z 2013-02-22T04:20:59Z

How can a question be off topic?

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/109369/pusey-barrett-and-rudolphs-no-go-theorem Jamahl Peavey 2012-10-11T18:19:20Z 2012-10-11T18:19:20Z

How is this off topic?

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/89414/does-godels-incompletenss-theorem-mean-there-is-no-solution-to-hilberts-6th-pro/89417#89417 Jamahl Peavey 2012-02-24T20:43:54Z 2012-02-24T20:43:54Z

I will try to read the book.

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/88028/is-the-wave-function-defined-by-system-a-a-generalization-and-are-its-nodes-rea/88452#88452 Jamahl Peavey 2012-02-15T14:50:43Z 2012-02-15T14:50:43Z

The answer is correct

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/88028/is-the-wave-function-defined-by-system-a-a-generalization-and-are-its-nodes-rea Jamahl Peavey 2012-02-15T12:52:23Z 2012-02-15T12:52:23Z

I first attempted to post the question within the Mathematical Physics section but was unable to do so. You have a right close any question but your bases for closing the question should concern anyone in the Mathematical Physics section. If a question is difficult to answer that does not mean it is not a question. Expertise in mathematics and physics is necessary to even evaluate the question. Andreas Blass clearly stated it was outside his field yet A.V, Y.C and S.C chose to close the question using his statement&quot;not a real question&quot;.

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/88028/is-the-wave-function-defined-by-system-a-a-generalization-and-are-its-nodes-rea Jamahl Peavey 2012-02-14T19:14:24Z 2012-02-14T19:14:24Z

To Vectornaut: System A can be considered quantum mechanical because it is a system of discrete structures. System B can be considered classical because it is a system of continuous structures. Proving a wave function can exist in both Systems took eight years to confirm. The classical wave function appears to be the most general because it can generate probabilities related to amplitude without restricting the amplitude magnitude. It also generates purely discrete nodes or nodes without continuous equivalent. Those nodes (n) have a larger domain (whole numbers).