User pacificmoth - MathOverflowmost recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-20T01:36:33Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/user/2013http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/24215/optimization-over-permutationOptimization over permutation?pacificmoth2010-05-11T08:20:06Z2010-11-27T23:22:13Z
<p>Say that we are given a set of variables, $X=\lbrace X_1,X_2,...,X_n \rbrace$. Their order $\Pi$ is an index array living in a permutation space $Perm(n)$. There is a positive function $f(X,\Pi) > 0$. I would like to optimize $f$ over $\Pi$, i.e., $\Pi^*=\arg\min_{\Pi\in Perm(n)}f(X,\Pi)$. Is there any good approximate algorithm for this?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/11183/how-can-i-embed-an-n-points-metric-space-to-a-hypercube-with-low-distortionHow can I embed an N-points metric space to a hypercube with low distortion?pacificmoth2010-01-08T20:41:00Z2010-09-04T13:33:08Z
<p>I have a N-point metric space defined by the pairwise distance matrix. I want to encode these N points with binary strings, i.e. each point will be mapped to a vertex in a hypercube. The lengths of the edges on the hypercube could be different for different dimensions. The hypercube basically is a hyper-rectangle.
Now the questions are the following:
1. Given the dimension of the hyper-rectangle, what is the lower bound of the distortion to the original metric space?
2. How to achieve that, i.e., the lengths of the edges, the vertices for each point?
3. Is the optimal embedding P or NP?</p>
<p>$A = (P,C), |P| = N, C\in [0,1]^{N\times N}$, find a mapping $f:P \rightarrow \times_{j=1}^D $ { $0,l_j $ }, $l_j > 0$.</p>
<p>such that for any $\frac{1}{\mu} C_{ij} \le |f(P_i)-f(P_j)| \le \mu C_{ij} $,</p>
<p>where $\mu \sim \Omega(g(D,N))$, is a polynomial function.
Thanks a lot!</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/19326/how-to-estimate-a-polyhedronconvex-hull-classifier-from-data-samplehow to estimate a polyhedron(convex hull) classifier from data samplepacificmoth2010-03-25T16:24:05Z2010-08-18T12:27:02Z
<p>Given a set of points $X\in\Re^D$, they have labels $Y\in${$-1,+1$}. I would like to separate the data labeled +1 and the data labeled -1 by a polyhedron. </p>
<p>$min_w \sum_i \xi_i + \frac{1}{2}\|w\|_2^2$</p>
<p>subject to: $ \xi_i > max_{j=1}^K[1-(w_j^Tx_i+b_j)]$, for $y_i=+1$</p>
<p>and $ \xi_i > min_{j=1}^K[1+(w_j^Tx_i+b_j)]$, for $y_i=-1$
and $ \xi_i > 0 $, for all $i$.</p>
<p>Where K is the number of faces of the polyhedron, i represents each sample, j represents each face of the polyhedron. I assume that all positive data go inside the polyhedron while negative data are outside. Following the max-margin principle, we let the distance of the point to the face offset by a margin 1.</p>
<p>Optimizing with the first constraint is straightforward. But the second one seems difficult.</p>
<p>Is there anyway to optimize them in a fast way to the optimal?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/22523/implicit-derivativeImplicit derivative?pacificmoth2010-04-25T19:06:27Z2010-05-28T15:03:56Z
<p>If we have function $y=L(x_1,x_2,x_3,...,x_n)$, and function $z=R(x_1,x_2,x_3,...,x_n)$. How to compute the derivative $\frac{dy}{dz}$?</p>
<p>Shall I do $\frac{dy}{dz} = \sup_{g\in \Re^n}\frac{\bigtriangledown_x L \cdot g}{\bigtriangledown_x R \cdot g}$?</p>
<p>Is there any mathematical term associated with this kind of derivatives?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/22522/how-is-a-permutation-taken-as-an-equivalent-of-a-hash-function-in-minwise-indepen/22543#22543Answer by pacificmoth for How is a permutation taken as an equivalent of a hash function in MinWise independent permutations?pacificmoth2010-04-25T22:45:01Z2010-04-25T22:45:01Z<p>The function could possibly be an index array of size n. For example, F[1,...,n] =[2,1,4,5...]. The total number of all these functions would be n!. The position of 1 implies the minimum hashed integer. For example, F[2] = 1 implies that 2 will be mapped into the minimum hash value (1). If we randomly choose F, it is easy to see that 1 appears in each position of the array equally likely. So the minwise independence condition holds.
Hopefully this helps.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/6819/regression-problem-detect-outliers/11516#11516Answer by pacificmoth for Regression problem/detect outlierspacificmoth2010-01-12T09:45:28Z2010-01-12T09:45:28Z<p>To achieve the robust estimation, you could try the least square regression with L1 regularization that is also well-known LASSO algorithm. <a href="http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~tibs/lasso.html" rel="nofollow">http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~tibs/lasso.html</a>
The relationship between robust estimation and lasso is explained in the following paper:
<a href="http://www.cim.mcgill.ca/~xuhuan/papers/Lasso-NIPS.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.cim.mcgill.ca/~xuhuan/papers/Lasso-NIPS.pdf</a></p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/6449/searching-global-minima-fastSearching global minima fast?pacificmoth2009-11-22T09:46:27Z2009-11-22T19:46:18Z
<p>I am minimizing a highly non-linear function. If I know the global minimum is at most some value, is this information helpful to design a faster algorithm than random restart?</p>
<p>
If we know an upper bound B so far, can we prove something like this, with a high probability, within M local minima visits, we will reach a local minimum B', and we have |B'-G| < eta|B-G|, where G is the unknown global minimum. And M is some polynomial function of eta, and maybe the dimension of the solution space.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/24215/optimization-over-permutationComment by pacificmothpacificmoth2010-05-12T19:53:54Z2010-05-12T19:53:54ZThe function that I am looking at is more like a negative log joint probability coming from a Bayesian network. I wonder if there is any greedy algorithm could possibly give us somewhat non-trivial approximation. But the points you mentioned are pretty interesting.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/22523/implicit-derivative/22526#22526Comment by pacificmothpacificmoth2010-04-25T19:34:46Z2010-04-25T19:34:46ZAgree. The sup must lead to infinity if the two gradients are not parallel. Thanks.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/22490/correlation-and-causation-when-can-we-believe-correlation-reasonably-at-least/22495#22495Comment by pacificmothpacificmoth2010-04-25T18:54:18Z2010-04-25T18:54:18ZWhen you don't have knowledge about the causality, people go to statistics asking for help. Then it probably becomes a mathematical matter. Especially, to figure out the causality, we have to do "actions" and estimate the model from the intervened dataset instead of the original observed dataset. How to estimate the true distribution from the intervened data without any bias is an important mathematical task. http://mathoverflow.net/questions/11183/how-can-i-embed-an-n-points-metric-space-to-a-hypercube-with-low-distortion/21322#21322Comment by pacificmothpacificmoth2010-04-15T16:00:41Z2010-04-15T16:00:41Zrandomized algorithm is already good enough. Thanks!http://mathoverflow.net/questions/11183/how-can-i-embed-an-n-points-metric-space-to-a-hypercube-with-low-distortion/11193#11193Comment by pacificmothpacificmoth2010-01-09T05:04:26Z2010-01-09T05:04:26ZIf, by any chance, you find the ref, please do let me know. I kinda like the idea of converting l_1 to a hamming space by concatenation. Thanks.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/11183/how-can-i-embed-an-n-points-metric-space-to-a-hypercube-with-low-distortionComment by pacificmothpacificmoth2010-01-09T04:31:08Z2010-01-09T04:31:08ZThanks for both of you. But my problem is that I don't really embed to a $\ell_1$ space. They have to be the vertices of the hyper-rectangle.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/11183/how-can-i-embed-an-n-points-metric-space-to-a-hypercube-with-low-distortion/11193#11193Comment by pacificmothpacificmoth2010-01-09T04:28:34Z2010-01-09T04:28:34ZThis is a fairly educating answer. I appreciate it.
But the thing here is that I have to restrict the assignment of points to the vertices instead of any vector inside the hypercube. So it isn't really embedding to $\ell_1$ space.
Or, maybe you could show me how to move those points to the vertices after embedding without much distortion, that would be cool. http://mathoverflow.net/questions/6449/searching-global-minima-fast/6461#6461Comment by pacificmothpacificmoth2009-11-23T20:03:22Z2009-11-23T20:03:22ZThanks again. Appreciate your input.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/6449/searching-global-minima-fast/6461#6461Comment by pacificmothpacificmoth2009-11-23T00:59:25Z2009-11-23T00:59:25ZActually I am not sure what kind of prior information I should be checking. It is probably not invariant to solution space permutation (the NFL condition as you suggested). Maybe not sub-modular either. Do you have any suggestions on the properties that I should be looking for?
On the other hand, I'm not looking for a polynomial global minimum solver. Instead, it would be good enough to me if any polynomial approximate solver can be improved, e.g. from N<sup>2</sup> to N logN, when the upper bound information or any prior information provided.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/6449/searching-global-minima-fast/6461#6461Comment by pacificmothpacificmoth2009-11-22T19:40:01Z2009-11-22T19:40:01ZThanks Martin.
If we know an upper bound B so far, can we prove something like this,
with a high probability, within M local minima visits, we will reach a local minimum B', and we have |B'-G| < eta|B-G|, where G is the unknown global minimum. And M is some polynomial function of eta, and maybe the dimension of the solution space.