User 喻yuwei - MathOverflowmost recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-06-18T22:40:59Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/user/19664http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/110553/integral-hodge-classes-of-the-calabi-yau-3-foldintegral hodge classes of the Calabi-Yau 3-fold喻yuwei2012-10-24T16:00:12Z2012-10-24T17:21:11Z
<p>I have been read many papers,But I don"t know a integral hodge class of the calabi-Yau 3-fold is algebraic or non-algebraic?Hope give some help and nice reference. Calabi-Yau 3-fold is a Kahler 3-fold with trival canonical bundle.Is it a open question?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/108023/how-do-hodge-classes-for-calabi-yau-4-folds-compare-with-the-classes-for-toriHow do Hodge classes for Calabi-Yau 4-folds compare with the classes for tori?喻yuwei2012-09-25T07:12:00Z2012-09-25T09:01:40Z
<p>Let $X$ be a Calabi-Yau 4-fold, i.e., a connected 4-dimensional compact Kahler manifold with $K_{X} \cong \mathscr{O}_{X}$ and $h^{i} (X,O_{X} )= 0$ for $0 \lt i \lt 4$.
Given a general 4-dimensional Weil torus $T$, one has a Hodge class contained in $H^{2,2}( X )$. I would like to ask whether the following equality holds:</p>
<p>$$ Hg^{2} ( X)_{prim}= Hg^{2}\left ( T \right )_{prim}$$</p>
<p>where $Hg^{2}\left ( X \right )_{prim}$ is a primitive Hodge class, and $Hg^2 ( \star )$ is defined as $ H^4 ( \star ,\mathbb{Q} )\cap H^{2,2} ( \star )$ for $\star = X,T$. If the equality is faulty, I would like to know why. If Hodge class is not unique, how do we get the classification of Hodge classes?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/106027/estimate-over-simply-connected-riemannian-manifold-with-non-positive-sectional-cestimate over simply-connected Riemannian manifold with non-positive sectional curvature喻yuwei2012-08-31T12:02:48Z2012-09-11T19:19:44Z
<p>Let<code>$M$</code> be a Complete simply-connected n-dimensional Riemannian manifold with nonpositive curvature,<code>$\Omega $</code>is a open subset of <code>$M$</code>,If <code>$n\geq 4$</code>Is anyone give a estimate of <code>$\frac{Vol_{n}\left ( \Omega \right )}{Vol_{n-1}\left ( \Omega \right )^{\frac{n}{n-1}}}$</code>?,If <code>$\Omega $</code>replace by <code>$B^{n}\left ( 1 \right )$</code>,it is a unit sphere,,estimate?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/106086/isoperimetric-inequality-from-cartan-hadamard-manifold-extend-to-alexandrov-spaceIsoperimetric inequality from Cartan-Hadamard manifold extend to Alexandrov space喻yuwei2012-09-01T02:25:21Z2012-09-01T13:35:43Z
<p>We known that Croke proved a isoperimetric inequality for the four dimensional Cartan-Hadamard manifold,I want to ask extend to Alexandrov space that whether have same isoperimetric inequality ?Whether may be added to some condition,Is <code>$CD\left ( n,k \right )$</code>(curvature dimension),Is <code>$MCP\left ( n,k \right )$</code>(measure contraction property) and create to New condition?Of course,Maybe inequality is same.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/106091/line-bundle-over-compact-simply-connected-topologically-regular-alexandrov-spaceLine bundle over compact simply-connected topologically regular Alexandrov space喻yuwei2012-09-01T04:01:34Z2012-09-01T13:34:10Z
<p>Let <code>$L$</code>be a line bundle over compact simply-connected topologically regular Alexandrov space<code>$X$</code>of demension 4 generated by fixed point set of smooth <code>$S^{1}-action$</code>,<code>$S^{1}-action$</code>is a section of <code>$L$</code>,Garcia proved that <code>$X$</code>with effective isometric action of <code>$S^{1}$</code>is Locally smmoth,For locally smooth topologically regular Alexandrov space<code>$X$</code>, I want to ask the following that whether isomorphism?<code>\[H^{0}(X,L)\simeq H^{1}(X,X^{S^{1}})\]</code> where <code>$X^{S^{1}}$</code>is smooth <code>$S^{1}-action$</code>.Do you have good idea?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/106095/implication-question-about-mean-curvature-flow"implication" question about mean curvature flow喻yuwei2012-09-01T05:20:31Z2012-09-01T13:28:39Z
<p>About paper's problems: Let $H$ be a mean curvature vector field. We have the differential inequality</p>
<p><code>\[ \frac{\partial }{\partial t} \left | H \right |^{2} \leq \Delta \left | H \right |^{2} + \beta \left | H \right |^{2} \]</code></p>
<p>where $\beta$ is a positive conatant. Putting $f=\left | H \right |^{2}$ and $B(R^{'}) = B_{g_{0}}(x,R^{'})$, and $q\geq 2$, then the above differential inequality apparently <strong><em>implies</em></strong> that</p>
<p><code>\[ \frac{1}{q} \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \int_{B(R^{'})} f^{q} \eta^{2} d\mu_{t} \leq \int_{B(R^{'})} (\eta ^{2} f^{q-1} \Delta f d\mu _{t} + \beta f^{q} \eta ^{2}) d\mu_{t} + \int_{B(R^{'})} \frac{1}{q} f^{q} \eta^{2} \frac{\partial }{\partial t} d\mu _{t} \]</code></p>
<p>where<code>$\eta =0, 1$</code>, and <code>$d\mu _{t}$</code> satisfies <code>$\frac{\partial }{\partial t} d\mu_{t} = -\left | H \right |^{2} d\mu_{t}$</code>. My question is: "Why implies?,“How implies”,I don’t understand this implies?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/95371/de-rham-vs-dolbeault-cohomology/95380#95380Answer by 喻yuwei for de Rham vs Dolbeault Cohomology喻yuwei2012-04-27T17:09:41Z2012-04-27T17:15:34Z<p>5.The cohomology of the projective space ,see akhil mathew's math bolg:<a href="http://amathew.wordpress.com/2010/11/22/the-cohomology-of-projective-space/" rel="nofollow">projective space</a></p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/95371/de-rham-vs-dolbeault-cohomology/95375#95375Answer by 喻yuwei for de Rham vs Dolbeault Cohomology喻yuwei2012-04-27T16:37:29Z2012-04-27T16:37:29Z<p>1.De Rham cohomology is a cohomology of k-forms on complex manifold。
Dolbeault Cohomology is a cohomology of smooth sections of the vector bundle of complex differential forms of degree (p,q) on complex manifold。so Dolbeault Cohomology is subcohomology of the De Rham cohomology.2.when p+q=0 </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/29498/what-is-mordell-weil-lattice/95369#95369Answer by 喻yuwei for What is Mordell-Weil lattice?喻yuwei2012-04-27T16:09:11Z2012-04-27T16:15:46Z<p>[T Shioda :Mordell-Weil lattice][1]</p>
<p>[1]: <a href="http://www.rkmath.rikkyo.ac.jp/math/shioda/papers/mwl.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.rkmath.rikkyo.ac.jp/math/shioda/papers/mwl.pdf</a> more Basic,you also see the homepage of Chao Li about Elliptic Surfaces and Mordell-Weil Lattices in harvard university。</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/108023/how-do-hodge-classes-for-calabi-yau-4-folds-compare-with-the-classes-for-toriComment by 喻yuwei喻yuwei2012-10-24T15:25:45Z2012-10-24T15:25:45ZIs it a false question?http://mathoverflow.net/questions/110318/how-to-describe-the-splitting-of-alexandrov-spaceComment by 喻yuwei喻yuwei2012-10-22T12:17:06Z2012-10-22T12:17:06ZPlease using Latex.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/109813/the-hodge-numbers-of-a-coveringComment by 喻yuwei喻yuwei2012-10-16T13:40:29Z2012-10-16T13:40:29ZWhat is the Hodge rhomb?http://mathoverflow.net/questions/108688/how-to-type-this-strange-symbol-in-latexComment by 喻yuwei喻yuwei2012-10-03T04:03:16Z2012-10-03T04:03:16ZShould be close it.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/108152/topological-immersionComment by 喻yuwei喻yuwei2012-09-26T12:38:28Z2012-09-26T12:38:28ZIt is not a real question.Who close it?http://mathoverflow.net/questions/108023/how-do-hodge-classes-for-calabi-yau-4-folds-compare-with-the-classes-for-toriComment by 喻yuwei喻yuwei2012-09-26T02:53:06Z2012-09-26T02:53:06ZExplain :the subspace$X^{'}$ of a Weil torus$X$ consists of the Hodge classes,and belongs to$H^{4}\left ( X,\mathbb{Q} \right )$ ,by Hodge decomposition,it contained in $H^{2,2}\left ( X \right )$ ,If it is not Hodge classes,maybe contained in$H^{1,3}\left ( X \right )$ ,$H^{3,1}\left ( X \right )$ ,$H^{0,4}\left ( X \right )$ or$H^{4,0}\left ( X \right )$ .Of course,the Hodge classes of$T$ whether exist in $X$ ,I hope have proof or counterexample .Prove its existence is a very diffficult.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/108049/what-is-projective-connectionComment by 喻yuwei喻yuwei2012-09-25T12:46:55Z2012-09-25T12:46:55ZIt is not real problem.Who close ithttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/108023/how-do-hodge-classes-for-calabi-yau-4-folds-compare-with-the-classes-for-toriComment by 喻yuwei喻yuwei2012-09-25T10:18:40Z2012-09-25T10:18:40ZCarnahan,thank you to fix English grammar fault,About the definition of Weil tori,see Voisin's papers and search in internet.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/107901/calabi-yau-and-ricci-flat-metricsComment by 喻yuwei喻yuwei2012-09-24T16:09:48Z2012-09-24T16:09:48ZCalabi-Yau theorem says that $Ric\left ( \omega \right )=\Omega $ ,and $X$ has Ricci-flat metric.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/107901/calabi-yau-and-ricci-flat-metricsComment by 喻yuwei喻yuwei2012-09-24T02:20:24Z2012-09-24T02:20:24ZProfessor Yang,yuwei$\neq $ bruno,doesn't concern mehttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/107901/calabi-yau-and-ricci-flat-metricsComment by 喻yuwei喻yuwei2012-09-23T18:14:24Z2012-09-23T18:14:24ZOnly show the canonical bundle $K_{X}$of $X$ is trivial.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/107901/calabi-yau-and-ricci-flat-metricsComment by 喻yuwei喻yuwei2012-09-23T16:13:36Z2012-09-23T16:13:36ZIt should be $X$ be a compact n-dimensional kahler manifold, has a Kahler metric with vanishing Ricci curvature,vanishing first Chern number 。http://mathoverflow.net/questions/106095/implication-question-about-mean-curvature-flowComment by 喻yuwei喻yuwei2012-09-01T15:50:45Z2012-09-01T15:50:45ZProfessor Yang, Can you give some details?Thank you.