User jjcale - MathOverflowmost recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-06-19T20:37:40Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/user/17261http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/125049/open-problems-in-pdes-dynamical-systems-mathematical-physics/125101#125101Answer by jjcale for Open problems in PDEs, dynamical systems, mathematical physicsjjcale2013-03-20T22:18:13Z2013-03-20T22:18:13Z<p>For a list of 15 open problems in mathematical physics (in 2000) see Simon's Problems, <a href="http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SimonsProblems.html" rel="nofollow">http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SimonsProblems.html</a>.</p>
<p>Some of these problems are solved, as mentioned in the link.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/119686/on-an-inequality-of-brezis-lieb/119688#119688Answer by jjcale for on an inequality of Brezis-Liebjjcale2013-01-23T19:46:51Z2013-01-23T19:46:51Z<p>No, choose $\Omega={z \in \mathbb{C} : |z| \leq 1 } ,\ f(z)=Re\
z^{n}$ and let $n\rightarrow \infty$ .</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/114555/does-physics-need-non-analytic-smooth-functions/114600#114600Answer by jjcale for Does Physics need non-analytic smooth functions?jjcale2012-11-26T22:53:50Z2012-11-26T22:53:50Z<p>In the BCS-theory of superconductivity the energy gap that seperates the ground state from the excited states is a non-analytic function of the exchange energy.</p>
<p>Here one doesn't use a taylor expansion of the interacting Hamiltonian around the non-interacting Hamiltonian. Instead one uses a Bogoliubov transformation.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/111558/projections-in-banach-spaces/112754#112754Answer by jjcale for Projections in Banach spacesjjcale2012-11-18T11:41:52Z2012-11-18T11:41:52Z<p>Here a simple example :</p>
<p>Let X be the cartesian product of $L^{\infty}$ and $L^{1}$ on the
interval $[0,1]$, let $P_{t}$ the canonical projection on the subspace
of functions with support $[0,t]$ and choose $Q(f_{1},f_{2}) =
(0,f_{1})$ .</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/95837/examples-of-theorems-with-proofs-that-have-dramatically-improved-over-time/95895#95895Answer by jjcale for Examples of theorems with proofs that have dramatically improved over timejjcale2012-05-03T16:40:53Z2012-05-03T16:40:53Z<p>Example of a bounded linear operator on a Banach space without non-trivial closed invariant subspace.</p>
<p>The first example was given bei Enfo in 1975. Enflo submitted the full article in 1981 and the article's complexity and length delayed its publication to 1987 (see <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Per_Enflo" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Per_Enflo</a>).
Simpler examples were constucted for example by Beauzamy and Charles Read.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/3764/does-there-exist-a-continuous-function-of-compact-support-with-fourier-transform/95678#95678Answer by jjcale for Does there exist a continuous function of compact support with Fourier transform outside L^1?jjcale2012-05-01T16:54:14Z2012-05-01T16:54:14Z<p>Choose $f(x)=\frac{(\frac{1}{2} -x)}{log(x)}$ for $0 < x \leq
\frac{1}{2}$ and $0$ otherwise.</p>
<p>Then $Im \int_{0}^{\infty} dk \ e^{-\varepsilon k}
\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dx \ f(x) e^{-ikx} = \int_{0}^{\frac{1}{2}}
dx \ \frac{(\frac{1}{2} -x)}{log(x)} \cdot
\frac{-x}{\varepsilon^{2}+x^{2}} \rightarrow \infty$ for $
\varepsilon \downarrow 0$ .</p>
<p>Therefore the Fourier transform of $f$ is not in $L^{1}$ .</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/85135/quasinilpotent-example/85147#85147Answer by jjcale for Quasinilpotent examplejjcale2012-01-07T20:07:34Z2012-01-07T20:07:34Z<p>In <a href="http://www.jstor.org/pss/2047905" rel="nofollow">http://www.jstor.org/pss/2047905</a> you can find a weighted shift operator that has this property.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/83043/on-the-paley-wiener-theorem/83171#83171Answer by jjcale for On the Paley-Wiener theoremjjcale2011-12-11T10:15:34Z2011-12-11T10:15:34Z<p>The answer is yes :<br>
Let $h$ be an even real valued Schwartz function whose Fourier
transform has compact support. Then choose $f(y) = \int_{-\infty}^y
x h(x)^{2} dx$ .</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/24672/perturbations-of-an-operator-that-disconnect-the-spectrum/81760#81760Answer by jjcale for Perturbations of an operator that disconnect the spectrum jjcale2011-11-23T23:13:31Z2011-11-23T23:13:31Z<p>For Hilbert spaces, the conjecture follows from fact 4 and the answer to question <a href="http://mathoverflow.net/questions/81652/complement-of-a-subspace-which-is-a-cartesian-product" rel="nofollow">http://mathoverflow.net/questions/81652/complement-of-a-subspace-which-is-a-cartesian-product</a> applied to the kernel of the map $H\times H\ni (v,w) \mapsto Av + (I-A)w \in X$ . </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/81652/complement-of-a-subspace-which-is-a-cartesian-productComplement of a subspace which is a cartesian productjjcale2011-11-22T20:24:54Z2011-11-23T20:38:37Z
<p>Let $H$ be a Hilbert space and $U$ a closed subspace of $H\times H$ .
Does then exist closed subspaces $V$ and $W$ of $H$ such that $H\times H =
U \oplus (V\times W)$ ? </p>
<p>See also <a href="http://mathoverflow.net/questions/24672/perturbations-of-an-operator-that-disconnect-the-spectrum" rel="nofollow">http://mathoverflow.net/questions/24672/perturbations-of-an-operator-that-disconnect-the-spectrum</a> .</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/2147/most-helpful-math-resources-on-the-web/81107#81107Answer by jjcale for Most helpful math resources on the webjjcale2011-11-16T19:39:24Z2011-11-16T19:39:24Z<p>For people who are interested in prime factorization :
www.mersenneforum.org</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/78164/quasinilpotence-and-finite-spectrum-iiquasinilpotence and finite spectrum IIjjcale2011-10-14T19:14:38Z2011-10-14T19:14:38Z
<p>Let A be a quasinilpotent operator on a Hilbert space and let every
operator of the algebra generated by $A$ and $A^{*}$ have finite
spectrum. Does then follow, that A is nilpotent ? </p>
<p>See also <a href="http://mathoverflow.net/questions/77177/quasinilpotence-and-finite-spectrum" rel="nofollow">http://mathoverflow.net/questions/77177/quasinilpotence-and-finite-spectrum</a>
and <a href="http://mathoverflow.net/questions/35207/finite-dimensional-subalgebras-of-c-star-algebras" rel="nofollow">http://mathoverflow.net/questions/35207/finite-dimensional-subalgebras-of-c-star-algebras</a></p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/77177/quasinilpotence-and-finite-spectrumquasinilpotence and finite spectrumjjcale2011-10-04T21:19:28Z2011-10-06T18:44:48Z
<p>Let A be a quasinilpotent operator on a Hilbert space and let $A^{*}A$ have finite spectrum.<br>
Does then follow, that A is nilpotent ?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/77177/quasinilpotence-and-finite-spectrum/77384#77384Answer by jjcale for quasinilpotence and finite spectrumjjcale2011-10-06T18:44:48Z2011-10-06T18:44:48Z<p>I found a counterexample : </p>
<p>Let $e_{1},e_{2},...$ be ON basis of the Hilbert space and define A by
$Ae_{2n-1} = \sqrt{1-\frac{1}{n^{2}}} \ e_{2n} \ + \ \frac{1}{n}
\ e_{2n+1}$ , $\ \ $n=1,2,3,... ,<br>
$Ae_{2n} = 0$ , $\ \ $n=1,2,3,... </p>
<p>Then A is a partial isometry and therefore $A^{*}A$ a projection.<br>
Furthermore A is quasinilpotent but not nilpotent. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/51531/theorems-that-are-obvious-but-hard-to-prove/73802#73802Answer by jjcale for Theorems that are 'obvious' but hard to provejjcale2011-08-26T20:46:00Z2011-08-26T20:46:00Z<p>A differentiable manifold M that is homeomorphic to the n-sphere is also diffeomorphic to the n-sphere .
Obvious, but wrong ! (But right for 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, 6- and 12-spheres).</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/73603/how-to-calculate-a-fredholm-index-numericallyHow to calculate a Fredholm index numericallyjjcale2011-08-24T19:37:33Z2011-08-25T07:02:04Z
<p>How can one calculate the index of a Fredholm operator numerically ?</p>
<p>In numerically calculations one uses always finte dimensional spaces.
But linear operators on finite dimensional spaces have always index zero. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/48671/examples-of-non-rigorous-but-efficient-mathematical-methods-in-physics/73597#73597Answer by jjcale for Examples of non-rigorous but efficient mathematical methods in physicsjjcale2011-08-24T18:56:36Z2011-08-24T18:56:36Z<p>The Hypernetted-chain approximation used in statistical mechanics.</p>
<p>Was for instance used in the theory of the fractional quantum hall effect by Laughlin in order to estimate the energies of elementary excitations of Laughlins wave function. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/40590/does-a-quantitative-version-of-fredholm-theory-exist/73595#73595Answer by jjcale for Does a quantitative version of Fredholm theory exist?jjcale2011-08-24T18:17:51Z2011-08-24T18:17:51Z<p>The second resolvent equation you are studying is an important tool in quantum scattering theory.</p>
<p>See M. Reed and B. Simon, "Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics", Vol IV, Academic Press </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/20726/bounding-a-spectral-gap-what-proof-techniques-exist/73440#73440Answer by jjcale for Bounding a spectral gap: what proof techniques exist?jjcale2011-08-22T21:19:10Z2011-08-22T21:19:10Z<p>For VBS quantum antiferromagnets in one dimension see also :</p>
<p>Ian Affleck, Tom Kennedy, Elliott H. Lieb and Hal Tasaki,
Valence bond ground states in isotropic quantum antiferromagnets.
Comm. Math. Phys., Volume 115, Number 3 (1988) </p>
<p>and</p>
<p>Stefan Knabe, Energy gaps and elementary excitations for certain VBS-quantum antiferromagnets, Journal of Statistical Physics
Volume 52, Numbers 3-4, 1988</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/16074/how-is-the-physical-meaning-of-an-irreducible-representation-justified/73435#73435Answer by jjcale for How is the physical meaning of an irreducible representation justified?jjcale2011-08-22T20:12:45Z2011-08-22T20:12:45Z<p>You can use group representation theory to reduce the dimensions of the problem.
And you can explain energy degeneracies .
That's all !</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/73242/existence-of-a-special-densityExistence of a special densityjjcale2011-08-19T20:53:32Z2011-08-21T05:44:47Z
<p>Does the following function
<code>$f:\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N})\rightarrow\{0,1\}$</code> exist :<br>
$f(\mathbb{N})=1$,<br>
$f(A\cup B)=f(A)+f(B)$ for $A\cap B=\emptyset$,<br>
$f(A)=0$ for finite $A$ </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/114743/is-the-poincare-action-on-the-klein-gordon-quantum-field-strongly-continuousComment by jjcalejjcale2013-06-01T17:37:42Z2013-06-01T17:37:42ZYour argument only shows that the action is not norm continous, and this means that the generators of the group action are unbounded operators.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/131725/whats-wrong-with-this-arithmetic-model-for-the-change-in-the-perception-of-numbComment by jjcalejjcale2013-05-24T18:58:36Z2013-05-24T18:58:36ZSee <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measurement_problem" rel="nofollow">en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measurement_problem</a>.
Or read Roger Penrose's "The road to reality".http://mathoverflow.net/questions/131583/is-there-anyway-to-rewrite-a-partial-differential-equation-using-language-of-diffComment by jjcalejjcale2013-05-23T17:32:21Z2013-05-23T17:32:21ZAn example are maxwells equations, see <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell%27s_equations" rel="nofollow">en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell%27s_equations</a>.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/113959/a-function-whose-fixed-points-are-the-primesComment by jjcalejjcale2013-05-15T18:19:11Z2013-05-15T18:19:11Z@Rodrigo: I used PARI/GP :
f(n)=n+n/vecmin(factor(n)[,1])-1
g(n)=while(1,my(m);m=f(n);if(n==m,break);print(m);n=m;)
g2(n)={my(m);my(i=0);while(1,m=f(n);i++;if(n==m,break);n=m;);[m,i]}
g2max(n)={
my(m=[0,0]);
for(i=2,n,
my(p=g2(i));
if(p[2] > m[2],m=[i,p[2]]);
);
m;
}http://mathoverflow.net/questions/113959/a-function-whose-fixed-points-are-the-primesComment by jjcalejjcale2013-05-05T07:09:03Z2013-05-05T07:09:03ZComputed for n up to 10000000 : record holder 6730914 with orbit length 226 .http://mathoverflow.net/questions/121565/mathematicians-whose-works-were-criticized-by-contemporaries-but-became-widely-ac/121572#121572Comment by jjcalejjcale2013-02-13T19:44:34Z2013-02-13T19:44:34ZSee also <a href="http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/18193/theoretical-proof-forbidding-loschmidt-reversal" rel="nofollow" title="theoretical proof forbidding loschmidt reversal">physics.stackexchange.com/questions/18193/…</a> .http://mathoverflow.net/questions/114018/fastest-way-to-factor-integers-260Comment by jjcalejjcale2012-11-21T21:04:56Z2012-11-21T21:04:56ZMaybe you should ask this question in the forum <a href="http://www.mersenneforum.org/" rel="nofollow">mersenneforum.org</a> .http://mathoverflow.net/questions/111558/projections-in-banach-spaces/112754#112754Comment by jjcalejjcale2012-11-18T12:32:49Z2012-11-18T12:32:49Z@fedja : Because $\|(P_{t+\varepsilon}-P_{t})Q(f_{1},f_{2})\| \leq
\varepsilon \|f_{1}\|_{\infty} \leq \varepsilon \|(f_{1},f_{2})\|$http://mathoverflow.net/questions/111558/projections-in-banach-spacesComment by jjcalejjcale2012-11-17T20:27:05Z2012-11-17T20:27:05ZThe restriction of $Q$ to $(I-P_{0})P_{1}X$ must be quasinilpotent.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/110405/resonance-of-schrodinger-operatorComment by jjcalejjcale2012-10-24T19:35:23Z2012-10-24T19:35:23Z@Delio Mugnolo : The Resolvent is only analytic outside the spectrum. If for instance the spectrum consists of the non negative real numbers, then it might be possible that on a subspace of the Hilbert space the resolvent can be analytically continued from the upper half plane to the lower half plane across the spectrum. If A is self adjoint then the resolvent itself can never have a pole outside the real axis, but the analytic continuation may have a pole there, and that's a resonance. And the imaginary part of the pole is interpreted as the inverse of the lifetime of the statehttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/110405/resonance-of-schrodinger-operatorComment by jjcalejjcale2012-10-23T19:28:46Z2012-10-23T19:28:46Z@Delio Mugnolo : To my knowledge a resonance is not a pole of the resolvent but a pole of an analytic continuation of the resolvent.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/109612/matrices-that-are-1-in-a-senseComment by jjcalejjcale2012-10-14T16:53:18Z2012-10-14T16:53:18ZA normal matrix N is in this class iff all absolute values of its eigenvalues are at least 1.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/107100/weyl-quantization-and-convexityComment by jjcalejjcale2012-09-13T19:14:09Z2012-09-13T19:14:09ZHere is a reference : <a href="http://arxiv.org/pdf/1007.1796.pdf" rel="nofollow">arxiv.org/pdf/1007.1796.pdf</a>http://mathoverflow.net/questions/105906/common-eigenvectorComment by jjcalejjcale2012-08-30T19:28:17Z2012-08-30T19:28:17ZEvery nonzero element of the spectrum of a compact operator on a Banach space is an eigenvalue of this operator. So this is a classical result in the infinite dimensional case.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/36094/notable-mathematics-during-world-war-iiComment by jjcalejjcale2012-08-29T19:45:32Z2012-08-29T19:45:32ZArne Beurling did important work during World War II : He deciphered a german secret teletypewriter, see <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arne_Beurling" rel="nofollow">en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arne_Beurling</a> .