User peter - MathOverflowmost recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-23T11:31:08Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/user/15417http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/66462/which-functions-of-one-variable-are-derivatives/66496#66496Answer by Peter for Which functions of one variable are derivatives ?Peter2011-05-30T21:46:51Z2012-12-28T02:34:51Z<p>Take a look a this book by <em>Andrew M. Bruckner</em>: <strong>Differentiation of real functions</strong>.</p>
<p>Chapter seven is about <em>The problem of characterizing derivatives</em>.</p>
<p>There is a <a href="http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.bams/1183545222" rel="nofollow">review by <em>Daniel Waterman</em></a>.</p>
<p>You might also want to take a look at <strong>Homeomorphisms in Analysis</strong> by <em>Goffman</em>, <em>Nishiura</em> and <em>Waterman</em>.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/67182/generalized-gauss-green-theoremGeneralized Gauss-Green theoremPeter2011-06-07T21:12:53Z2011-06-21T17:50:30Z
<p>I am looking for a generalized version of the Gauss-Green theorem also known as the divergence theorem:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divergence_theorem" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divergence_theorem</a></p>
<p>A quick search on <a href="http://www.ams.org/mathscinet/search/publications.html?pg5=TI&s5=gauss+green" rel="nofollow">MathSciNet</a> suggests that there are generalizations for bad domains and nonsmooth functions. However, they seem to rely on heavy machinery and not to be suited for the special case I am interested in.</p>
<p>For example, I found this formula on PlanetMath:<code>$$ \int_E \mathrm{div} f(x)\, dx
= \int_{\partial^* E} \langle \nu_E(x),f(x)\rangle \,d\mathcal H^{n-1}(x)$$</code></p>
<p>See <a href="http://planetmath.org/?method=l2h&from=objects&name=GaussGreenTheorem&op=getobj" rel="nofollow">http://planetmath.org/?method=l2h&from=objects&name=GaussGreenTheorem&op=getobj</a> for the details.</p>
<hr>
<p>Let $\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^n$ be open and bounded and $f\in C^1(\Omega, \mathbb{R}^n) \cap C^0(\overline\Omega, \mathbb{R}^n)$. </p>
<p><strong>Question:</strong> What conditions do we have to impose on $\Omega$ (or $f$) to ensure that the divergence theorem holds true?</p>
<hr>
<p>To clarify my question: I know that requiring the boundary of $\Omega$ to be piecewise regular is sufficient for the Gauss-Green theorem to be true. I wondered if this condition is also necessary. If so: is the an other "version" of Gauss-Green (e.g. the one cited above) which holds true under weaker conditions and is especially suited for the case of an open and bounded domain</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/66240/topological-spaces-uncountable-subsets-and-separabilityTopological spaces, uncountable subsets and separabilityPeter2011-05-27T22:32:11Z2011-05-28T11:37:27Z
<p>Hi, the following is a well known theorem</p>
<p><em>Let $M$ be a metric space. If every uncountable subset of $M$ has a limit point, then $M$ is separable.</em></p>
<p>Question: Is there a similar result for topological spaces?</p>
<p>I have almost no knowledge of topology so I can only hope that this is not trivial.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/67182/generalized-gauss-green-theoremComment by PeterPeter2011-06-07T22:09:09Z2011-06-07T22:09:09ZWikipedia says that the divergence theorem is also known as Gauss' theorem, Ostrogradsky's theorem, or Gauss–Ostrogradsky theorem. My professor called it the Gauss-Green theorem.