User a m - MathOverflowmost recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-06-19T05:22:28Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/user/10001http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/54708/period-rings-for-galois-representationsPeriod rings for Galois representationsA M2011-02-07T23:06:48Z2012-02-04T22:30:12Z
<p>I have some questions concerning period rings for Galois representations.</p>
<p>First, consider the case of $p$-adic representations of the absolute Galois group $G_K$, where $K$ denote a $p$-adic field. Among all these representations, we can distinguish some of them, namely those which are Hodge-Tate, de Rham, semistable or crystalline. This is due to Fontaine who constructed some period rings : $B_{HT}$, $B_{dR}$, $B_{st}$ and $B_{crys}$.</p>
<p>Constructing the ring $B_{HT}$ is not very difficult and it is quite natural. </p>
<p>Does someone have any idea where $B_{dR}$ comes from ?</p>
<p>For $B_{crys}$, I guess it was constructed to detect the good reduction of (proper, smooth ?) varieties. I don't know anything of crystalline cohomology but does someone have a simple explanation of the need to use the power divided enveloppe of the Witt vectors of the perfectisation (?) of $\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{C}_p}$ ?</p>
<p>As for the ring $B_{st}$, once you have $B_{crys}$, I think the idea of Fontaine was to add a period from Tate's elliptic curve, which have bad semistable reduction. Does someone knows if Fontaine was aware that adding just this period will be sufficient or was it a good surprise ?</p>
<p>Finally, why there is no period rings for global $p$-adic Galois representations ?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/55663/when-is-an-extension-of-characters-de-rham/55673#55673Answer by A M for When is an extension of characters de Rham? A M2011-02-16T23:24:02Z2011-02-16T23:24:02Z<p>Take a look at section 16 of this document of Laurent Berger : <a href="http://www.umpa.ens-lyon.fr/~lberger/barcelone/BergerBarcelone.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.umpa.ens-lyon.fr/~lberger/barcelone/BergerBarcelone.pdf</a></p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/49794/induced-representations-and-varphi-gamma-modulesInduced representations and $(\varphi, \Gamma)-modulesA M2010-12-18T12:02:38Z2010-12-19T08:01:00Z
<p>Let $K$ be a finite extension of $\mathbb{Q}_p$ and $L$ be a finite Galois extension of $K$. Let $V$ be a $p$-adic representation of $G_L$ Let $D$ be the $(\varphi, \Gamma)$-module associated to $V$ by Fontaine's functor. Is there an easy way to describe the $(\varphi, \Gamma)$-module associated to $Ind_{G_L}^{G_K} V$ in terms of $D$ ?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/46756/cohomology-and-tensor-productCohomology and tensor productA M2010-11-20T18:01:45Z2010-11-20T18:01:45Z
<p>Let $G$ be a profinite group, $A$ a free $\mathbb{Z}_p$-module of finite rank with a continuous action of $G$ and $B$ any $\mathbb{Z}_p$-module (I am not supposing it to be free), with the trivial action of $G$.</p>
<p>I am looking at continuous cohomology groups. I tought that $H^i(G,A \otimes B)$ would be isomorphic to $H^i(G,A) \otimes B$, which is false in general.</p>
<p>Is there a condition on $B$ making this statement true ?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/41940/local-to-global-galois-representationlocal to global Galois representationA M2010-10-12T20:02:46Z2010-10-12T20:18:20Z
<p>Let $\rho_p : \mbox{Gal}(\overline{\mathbb{Q}}_p / {\mathbb{Q}_p}) \to \mbox{GL}_n(\mathbb{Q}_p)$ be a de Rham $p$-adic representation. Can one find a representation $\rho : \mbox{Gal}(\overline{\mathbb{Q}}/\mathbb{Q}) \to \mbox{GL}_n(\mathbb{Q}_p)$ such that $\rho$ is geometric (in the sense of Fontaine-Mazur) and such that the restriction of $\rho$ to $\mbox{Gal}(\overline{\mathbb{Q}}_p / {\mathbb{Q}_p})$ is $\rho_p$ ?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/65411/how-can-we-extend-galois-representationsComment by A MA M2011-05-19T10:16:40Z2011-05-19T10:16:40ZWhat do you mean by "$\rho_E$ is invariant under $Gal(E/F)$" ?http://mathoverflow.net/questions/53036/books-you-would-like-to-read-if-somebody-would-just-write-them/53044#53044Comment by A MA M2011-01-24T18:26:03Z2011-01-24T18:26:03ZFor Laurent : will this book be an extended version of your Galois trimester notes or something else ?http://mathoverflow.net/questions/52322/de-rham-cohomology-of-formal-groupsComment by A MA M2011-01-17T19:48:41Z2011-01-17T19:48:41ZNeil, I am interested in a proof too, is that too much work to post the proof here or secret or is it possible for you to share it ? Thanks by advance.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/49794/induced-representations-and-varphi-gamma-modules/49858#49858Comment by A MA M2010-12-20T18:12:11Z2010-12-20T18:12:11ZThanks, it is exactly what I wanted to know. So basically, on the $(\varphi, \Gamma)$-module side, the construction is the "obvious" one. http://mathoverflow.net/questions/48079/hodge-tate-decomposition-for-formal-groups/48083#48083Comment by A MA M2010-12-02T19:45:50Z2010-12-02T19:45:50ZI don't know if jjj knows where to find Tate's original article so I may add that it is in : Proceedings of a Conference on Local Fields, Springer, 1967.http://mathoverflow.net/questions/46756/cohomology-and-tensor-productComment by A MA M2010-11-20T23:19:10Z2010-11-20T23:19:10ZI am pretty aware that the reduction mod p of the cohomology is not the cohomology of the reduction mod p, which is quite strange to me...