A question about matrices with more details - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-06-19T17:46:37Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/98260http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/98260/a-question-about-matrices-with-more-detailsA question about matrices with more detailsdriss-alamilouati2012-05-29T08:28:28Z2012-05-31T19:28:17Z
<p>Let $A,B\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times n}$. Suppose that $B$ is nonsingular and that there exists $m$ reals pairwise distinct $\lambda_{1},\cdots,\lambda_{r},\cdots,\lambda_{m}$ such that
$$B^{-1}A=\begin{pmatrix}
\lambda_{1}& 1&&&&&&\cr
&\lambda_{1}&\ddots&&&&&\cr
&&\ddots&&&\LARGE{0}&&\cr
&&&\lambda_{r}&1&&&\cr
&&&&\lambda_{r}&&&\cr
&&&&&\lambda_{r+1}&&\cr
&&\LARGE{0}&&&&\ddots&\cr
&&&&&&&\lambda_{m}
\end{pmatrix}$$
(<em>It is the canonical Jordan form</em>)
Can we ever find reals numbers $ t_ {1}, \cdots, t_ {p} $ so that the two following assertions are true:</p>
<ol>
<li>$A\Big(\displaystyle\prod_{i=1}^{p}(A+t_{i}B)\Big)B=B\Big(\displaystyle\prod_{i=1}^{p}(A+t_{i}B)\Big)A$</li>
<li>$\Big(\displaystyle\prod_{i=1}^{p}(A+t_{i}B)\Big)B\quad\mbox{is nonsingular and diagonalizable }$?</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>N.B :</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>The integer $p$ is not fixed.</li>
<li>This question has arisen when studying the contollability of a real discrete-time nonlinear system. This explains why the matrices are supposed to be reals.</li>
</ol>
<p>Thanks for help.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/98260/a-question-about-matrices-with-more-details/98304#98304Answer by Michael Renardy for A question about matrices with more detailsMichael Renardy2012-05-29T20:30:28Z2012-05-29T20:30:28Z<p>Let
$$A=\pmatrix{1&0\cr 0&0},\quad B=\pmatrix{0&1\cr 0&0}.$$
Then $A^2=A$, $AB=B$, $BA=0$, $B^2=0$. It follows that
$$A\prod (A+t_iB)B=B,$$
$$B\prod (A+t_iB)A=0.$$</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/98260/a-question-about-matrices-with-more-details/98351#98351Answer by Denis Serre for A question about matrices with more detailsDenis Serre2012-05-30T10:02:28Z2012-05-30T11:19:39Z<p>To my taste, it seems more natural to let $A$ and $B$ play symmetric role, by asking whether there exists non-trivial factors $s_jA+t_jB$ such that
$$A\left(\prod_{j=1}^p(s_jA+t_jB)\right)B=B\left(\prod_{j=1}^p(s_jA+t_jB)\right)A.$$</p>
<p>If you pose the question in an algebraically closed field $k$ (say, $k=\mathbb C$), then the answer is <strong>yes</strong> for the following reason:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>There exist $2^n-1$ non-zero factors $s_jA+t_jB$ such that $\prod_{j=1}^n(s_jA+t_jB)=0$.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The proof is by induction over the rank of products $\prod_{j=1}^p(s_jA+t_jB)=0$. Suppose that exists such a product $\Pi$, with rank $r\ge1$. Let us write
$$\Pi=\sum_{j=1}^rx_ja_j^T.$$
Then
$$\Pi M\Pi=\sum_{i,j=1}^r(a_i^TMx_j)x_ia_j^T.$$
The rank of $\Pi M\Pi$ will be less than or equal to $r-1$ if $\det(a_i^TMx_j)_{1\le i,j\le r}=0$. When $M=sA+tB$, this writes $H(s,t)=0$ where $H$ is a homogeneous polynomial of degree $r$. If $r\ge1$, it does have a non-trivial zero. Then $\Pi':=\Pi(sA+tB)\Pi$ is an other product, with rank $\le r-1$. If in addition $\Pi$ has $2^{n-r}-1$ factors, then $\Pi'$ has $2^{n+1-r}-1$ factors. After $n$ steps, one obtains a product of $2^n-1$ factors whose rank is $0$.</p>