Special divisor function summation - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-22T23:54:05Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/97353http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/97353/special-divisor-function-summationSpecial divisor function summationAlex Botros2012-05-18T21:16:49Z2012-05-19T16:57:49Z
<p>What is a good upper bound for
$$\sum_{d\leq z} \mu(d)\frac{\tau(d)}{d}$$
where $\tau(d)$ is the divisor function?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/97353/special-divisor-function-summation/97367#97367Answer by Igor Rivin for Special divisor function summationIgor Rivin2012-05-19T02:06:58Z2012-05-19T02:06:58Z<p>It seems to me that the accepted answer to <a href="http://mathoverflow.net/questions/92967/a-truncated-divisor-function-sum" rel="nofollow">this question</a> can be adapted, step by step, to give the estimate you need.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/97353/special-divisor-function-summation/97399#97399Answer by GH for Special divisor function summationGH2012-05-19T14:26:32Z2012-05-19T14:47:25Z<p>Let me elaborate on Matt Young's comment and show, for a sufficiently small absolute constant $c>0$,
$$ \sum_{d\leq z} \mu(d)\frac{\tau(d)}{d} \ll \exp(-c\sqrt{\log z}). $$
All references will be from Montgomery-Vaughan: Multiplicative number theory I.</p>
<p>We can assume that $z>2$ is not an integer. The associated Dirichlet series
$$ F(s):=\sum_{d=1}^\infty\mu(d)\frac{\tau(d)}{d^{s+1}}
=\prod_p\left(1-\frac{2}{p^{s+1}}\right)=\frac{G(s)}{\zeta(s+1)^2} $$
is absolutely convergent in $\Re s>0$, and $G(s)$ is given by an absolutely convergent
Euler product in $\Re s>-1/2$. In particular, $G(s)$ is holomorphic, bounded, and bounded away from zero in any half-plane $\Re s>-1/2+\epsilon$.
By Perron's formula (Theorem 5.2 and Corollary 5.3), we have
$$ \sum_{d\leq z} \mu(d)\frac{\tau(d)}{d}
=\frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_{\sigma_0-iT}^{\sigma_0+iT}F(s)\frac{z^s}{s}dz+R, $$
where $T>0$ is arbitrary, $\sigma_0:=\frac{1}{\log z}$, and
$$ R \ll \sum_{ z/2 < d < 2z } \frac{\tau(d)}{d} \min\left(1,\frac{z}{T|z-d|}\right)
+\frac{1}{T}\sum_d\frac{\tau(d)}{d^{1+\sigma_0}}. $$
It is straightforward to estimate the right hand side to yield
$$ R \ll z^{-\frac{1}{2}+\epsilon}+\frac{\log^2 z}{T}. $$
To see this, we estimate the first term as
$$ \sum_{ z/2 < d < 2z } \frac{\tau(d)}{d} \min\left(1,\frac{z}{T|z-d|}\right)
\ll z^{-\frac{1}{2}+\epsilon}+\frac{1}{T}\sum_{{z/2 < d < 2z}\atop{|z-d|>\sqrt{2z}}}\frac{\tau(d)}{|z-d|}$$
$$ \ll z^{-\frac{1}{2}+\epsilon}+\frac{1}{T}\sum_{ \ell < \sqrt{2z}}\frac{1}{\ell}\sum_{z/(2\ell) < m < 2z/\ell}
\min\left(1,\left|\frac{z}{\ell}-m\right|^{-1}\right), $$
and for the inner sum we apply the argument on page 180 in the book.
We shall use $T:=\exp(\sqrt{c\log z})$ for some small absolute constant $c>0$, so that
$$ \sum_{d\leq z} \mu(d)\frac{\tau(d)}{d}
=\frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_{\sigma_0-iT}^{\sigma_0+iT}F(s)\frac{z^s}{s}dz
+O\left(\frac{\log^2 z}{T}\right).$$
Using Theorem 6.7 we can see that the integrand is holomorphic in the rectangle
with vertices $\sigma_0\pm iT$ and $\sigma_1\pm iT$, for $\sigma_1:=-\frac{c}{\log T}$
and $c>0$ a small absolute constant. Moreover, we can estimate the integrand on the
sides of the rectangle. Hence applying Cauchy's theorem and estimates as on page 181 of the book, we obtain
$$ \sum_{d\leq z} \mu(d)\frac{\tau(d)}{d} \ll z^{-\sigma_1}(\log z)^3+\frac{\log^2 z}{T}.$$
The right hand side is $\ll\exp(-(c/2)\sqrt{\log z})$, proving the original claim.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/97353/special-divisor-function-summation/97409#97409Answer by js for Special divisor function summationjs2012-05-19T16:51:51Z2012-05-19T16:57:49Z<p>This is also directly related to the size of $\sum_{n \leq X} \mu(n)$ as follows :</p>
<p>Assume that the estimate $\sum_{n \leq X} \frac{\mu(n)}{n} = O(\varepsilon(X))$ holds for some non increasing function $\varepsilon$ (with $ \varepsilon(X) = O(\log X ) $ ). From Dirichlet hyperbola principle we have</p>
<p>$$\sum_{n \leq X} \frac{\mu \star \mu(n)}{n} = 2\sum_{n \leq \sqrt{X}} \frac{\mu(n)}{n} \sum_{dn \leq X} \frac{\mu(d)}{d} - \left( \sum_{n \leq \sqrt{X}} \frac{\mu(n)}{n} \right)^2 $$
and thus </p>
<p>$$\sum_{n \leq X} \frac{\mu \star \mu(n)}{n} = O \left( \varepsilon(\sqrt{X}) \log X +\varepsilon(\sqrt{X})^2 \right) = O \left( \varepsilon(\sqrt{X}) \log X \right) $$</p>
<p>Now set $g = \mu \tau \star 1 \star 1$. As noted above by Matt Young and GH, the series $\sum_{n \geq 1} g(n) n^{- \sigma}$ converges absolutely for $\sigma > \frac{1}{2}$. Observe that</p>
<p>$$\sum_{n \leq X} \frac{\mu(n) \tau (n)}{n} = \sum_{n \leq X} \frac{g(n)}{n} \sum_{dn \leq X} \frac{\mu \star \mu(d)}{d} = O \left( \sum_{n \leq X} \frac{|g(n)|}{n} \varepsilon(\sqrt{\frac{X}{n}}) \log \frac{X}{n} \right) $$</p>
<p>Since $\sum_{n \geq X^{\frac{1}{2}}} |g(n)| n^{- 1} = O \left( X^{-\frac{1}{6}} \sum_{n} |g(n)| n^{- \frac{2}{3}} \right) = O \left( X^{-\frac{1}{6}} \right) $, we get</p>
<p>$$\sum_{n \leq X} \frac{\mu(n) \tau (n)}{n} = O \left( \varepsilon(X^{\frac{1}{4}}) \log X + X^{-\frac{1}{7}} \right) $$</p>
<p>For example, an estimate $\sum_{n \leq X} \frac{\mu(n)}{n} = o(\frac{1}{\log X})$ ensures that $\sum_{n \leq X} \frac{\mu(n) \tau (n)}{n} = o \left( 1 \right) $</p>