partial order on conjugate classes of subgroups - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-06-20T10:40:37Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/95203http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/95203/partial-order-on-conjugate-classes-of-subgroupspartial order on conjugate classes of subgroupsLinxiao2012-04-25T22:00:38Z2012-04-26T01:32:27Z
<p>G is a group.
For a subgroup H of G, note $[H]$ the class of subgroups which are conjugate
to H.</p>
<p>Define the binary relation:
$[H] \leq [K]$
iff
$H_0 \subset K_0$ for some $H_0 \in [H]$ and $K_0 \in [K]$</p>
<p>It is easy to see that this relation is reflexive and transitive.
But how to show that it is anti-symmetric?</p>
<p>P.S.
In a book, the author claims that this relation defines a partial order on
the classes of conjugate subgroups in a context where G is a compact Lie
group. But I don't think the compact Lie group condition be essential, right?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/95203/partial-order-on-conjugate-classes-of-subgroups/95206#95206Answer by Tom Goodwillie for partial order on conjugate classes of subgroupsTom Goodwillie2012-04-25T22:12:11Z2012-04-25T22:12:11Z<p>The compactness is essential. Let $G$ be the group of conformal automorphisms of $\mathbb R^2$. Let $H$ be the group of translations $(x,y)\mapsto (x+m,x+n)$, $m$ and $n$ integers. Let $K$ be the group of translations $(x,y)\mapsto (x+m,x+2n)$, $m$ and $n$ integers. $K$ is a subgroup of $H$, and a conjugate of $H$ is a subgroup of $K$, but $H$ is not conjugate to $K$.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/95203/partial-order-on-conjugate-classes-of-subgroups/95214#95214Answer by Mark Sapir for partial order on conjugate classes of subgroupsMark Sapir2012-04-26T01:32:27Z2012-04-26T01:32:27Z<p>Here is a countable example. Take the Baumslag-Solitar group $\langle a, b \mid bab^{-1}=a^{4}\rangle$. Let $K=\langle a\rangle$, $H=\langle a^2\rangle$. Then $[K]\ne [H]$ (the standard properties of HNN extensions, see the book of Lyndon and Schupp), but $K > H$ while $bKb^{-1} < H$. </p>