Is the centralizer of a torus in a Kac-Moody algebra always a Borcherds algebra? - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net 2013-05-22T13:38:05Z http://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/94421 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdf http://mathoverflow.net/questions/94421/is-the-centralizer-of-a-torus-in-a-kac-moody-algebra-always-a-borcherds-algebra Is the centralizer of a torus in a Kac-Moody algebra always a Borcherds algebra? Ben Webster 2012-04-18T15:43:48Z 2012-04-20T04:25:58Z <p>If one has a finite dimension simple Lie algebra, one can easily calculate that taking the centralizer of a torus (or toral subalgebra), that is, summing the weight spaces that lie in some proper subspace of the dual Cartan, always gives a finite dimensional reductive Lie algebra; actually almost semi-simple, except that there is some central toral subalgebra (maybe bigger than the original torus).</p> <p>For an affine Lie algebra, the picture is the same if you pick a subspace on which $(-,-)$ is positive definite, you get again something finite dimensional and reductive. If you pick a subspace containing $\delta$, however, things are a bit messier. Now you have an affine Lie algebra plus a central piece in every single one of the imaginary weight spaces; thus you have an infinite dimensional center. I would kind of like to think of this as a Borcherds algebra, where I add infinitely many rows and columns of zeros to the affine Cartan matrix.</p> <p>For a hyperbolic Kac-Moody algebra, the picture is even worse; I still get a hyperbolic KM algebra attached to the root subsystem living in the subspace, but the "extra stuff" in imaginary weight spaces is much more complicated and not central anymore. This seems very complicated, but I hope to get some kind of handle on it:</p> <blockquote> <p>Is it true that the centralizer of torus in a hyperbolic Kac-Moody algebra is a Borcherds algebra (necessarily infinite rank in most interesting cases)? Is there some nice description of its Cartan matrix?</p> </blockquote> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/94421/is-the-centralizer-of-a-torus-in-a-kac-moody-algebra-always-a-borcherds-algebra/94595#94595 Answer by S. Carnahan for Is the centralizer of a torus in a Kac-Moody algebra always a Borcherds algebra? S. Carnahan 2012-04-20T04:25:58Z 2012-04-20T04:25:58Z <p>The answer to your first question is "yes", and it follows from Theorem 1 in Borcherds's paper <em>Central extensions of generalized Kac-Moody algebras</em>, which is available online as number 11 on <a href="http://math.berkeley.edu/~reb/papers/index.html" rel="nofollow">his papers page</a>. The inner product and involution can be chosen as restrictions from your hyperbolic Kac-Moody algebra.</p> <p>The general philosophy for recognizing these objects is that "anything that looks like a Borcherds algebra is a Borcherds algebra" (cf. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generalized_Kac-Moody_algebra" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia</a>), and it holds here. As long as your Lie algebra is long and skinny (i.e., admits a $\mathbb{Z}$-grading with finite dimensional pieces), and symmetrically shaped (i.e., admits an involution and a bilinear form), you're all set.</p> <p>I don't know a nice description of the Cartan matrix, but the proof of the theorem gives a general construction. You may also want to look at Borcherds's later paper <em>A characterization of generalized Kac-Moody algebras</em> (number 15 on the same page). As a rule, you should try to avoid actually using the Cartan matrix of a Borcherds algebra if you possibly can.</p>