Total spaces of $TS^2$ and $S^2 \times R^2$ not homeomorphic - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net 2013-06-19T10:24:26Z http://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/92337 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdf http://mathoverflow.net/questions/92337/total-spaces-of-ts2-and-s2-times-r2-not-homeomorphic Total spaces of $TS^2$ and $S^2 \times R^2$ not homeomorphic zygund 2012-03-27T01:52:20Z 2012-04-01T22:02:29Z <p>Hello,</p> <p>I'm looking for an invariant to distinguish the homeomorphism types of homotopy equivalent spaces. Specifically, how does one show that the total spaces of the tangent bundle to $S^2$ and the trivial bundle $S^2 \times R^2$ are not homeomorphic? (I am not asking for a proof that $TS^2$ is not the trivial bundle.)</p> <p>Also, is there a way to reduce the question, "Are the total spaces of two vector bundles homeomorphic" to "Are the associated sphere bundles homeomorphic"? In the case of $TS^2$ and $S^2\times R^2$ it's not too difficult to show that the sphere bundles are not homeomorphic, and I'm wondering if there's a way to leverage that.</p> <p>Thanks,</p> <p>Zygund</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/92337/total-spaces-of-ts2-and-s2-times-r2-not-homeomorphic/92372#92372 Answer by Neil Strickland for Total spaces of $TS^2$ and $S^2 \times R^2$ not homeomorphic Neil Strickland 2012-03-27T13:02:23Z 2012-03-27T13:08:46Z <p>This is more or less equivalent to Ryan's comment but with more details and a slightly different point of view.</p> <p>Let $X$ be the total space of the tangent bundle, and put $Y=S^2\times\mathbb{R}^2$. If $X$ and $Y$ were homeomorphic, then their one-point compactifications would also be homeomorphic. We will show that this is impossible by considering their cohomology rings.</p> <p>Put <code>$X'=\{(p,q)\in S^2\times S^2 : p+q\neq 0\}$</code>. There is a homeomorphism $f:X\to X'$ given by $f(u,v)=((\|v\|^2-1)u+2v)/(\|v\|^2+1)$ (a variant of stereographic projection). It follows that $X_\infty$ can be obtained from $S^2\times S^2$ by collapsing out the antidiagonal. We have <code>$H^*(S^2\times S^2)=\mathbb{Z}[a,b]/(a^2,b^2)$</code> and it follows that <code>$H^*(X_\infty)$</code> is the subring generated by $1$, $a+b$ and $ab$. In particular, the squaring map from $H^2$ to $H^4$ is nonzero.</p> <p>However, $Y$ can be identified with $(S^2\times S^2)\setminus (S^2\times\{point\})$, so <code>$H^*(Y_\infty)$</code> is isomorphic to the subring generated by $1$, $a$ and $ab$, so the squaring map $H^2\to H^4$ is zero. </p> <p>Note that the tangent bundle plus a rank-one trivial bundle is trivial, so the suspensions of $X_\infty$ and $Y_\infty$ are homeomorphic.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/92337/total-spaces-of-ts2-and-s2-times-r2-not-homeomorphic/92374#92374 Answer by Tom Goodwillie for Total spaces of $TS^2$ and $S^2 \times R^2$ not homeomorphic Tom Goodwillie 2012-03-27T13:49:01Z 2012-03-27T13:49:01Z <p>This may be overkill, but to elaborate on Ryan's answer in another way:</p> <p>Without mentioning either boundaries or any other compactifications, we can define the intersection number of $x\in H_p$ and $y\in H_q$ for homology classes in an oriented $(p+q)$-manifold. First turn them into compactly supported cohomology classes by duality, then cup these to get into $H_c^{p+q}\cong H_0$, etc.</p> <p>In the smooth case (smooth manifold, and classes represented by smooth compact oriented submanifolds), after putting the submanifolds in general position you can get this same number by counting intersection points with signs. </p> <p>When $x=y$ this is the same as counting the zeroes of a section of the normal bundle of the submanifold.</p> <p>This in turn is the same as evaluating the Euler number of the normal bundle of the submanifold on the fundamental class of the submanifold.</p> <p>Of course, in our examples the ambient manifold <i>is</i> the total space of the normal bundle, so what all of this amounts to is the statement:</p> <p>The self-intersection number (as defined by algebraic topology) of the zero section of a smooth rank $n$ oriented vector bundle over an oriented $n$-manifold is the result of evaluating the Euler class of the submanifold on the fundamental class.</p> <p>I don't see that any of this follows from what I call Poincare-Hopf. But, if you combine the last statement with the fact that in the special case of the tangent bundle evaluation of Euler class on the fundamental class gives Euler number, then you get Poincare-Hopf.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/92337/total-spaces-of-ts2-and-s2-times-r2-not-homeomorphic/92376#92376 Answer by Igor Rivin for Total spaces of $TS^2$ and $S^2 \times R^2$ not homeomorphic Igor Rivin 2012-03-27T13:51:32Z 2012-03-27T13:51:32Z <p>A general form of this question is studied by De Sapio and Walschap in <a href="http://dl.dropbox.com/u/5188175/desapiowalschap.pdf" rel="nofollow">"Diffeomorphism of total spaces and equivalence of bundles"</a> -- a very cool paper (which uses a quite different. at least on the surface, method from that suggested).</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/92337/total-spaces-of-ts2-and-s2-times-r2-not-homeomorphic/92383#92383 Answer by alvarezpaiva for Total spaces of $TS^2$ and $S^2 \times R^2$ not homeomorphic alvarezpaiva 2012-03-27T14:56:54Z 2012-03-29T11:35:59Z <p>These answers look at bit complicated so maybe there is something obviously wrong with the following argument:</p> <p>Every embedded two-sphere $\Sigma \subset S^2 \times {\mathbb R}^2$ is <em>displaceable</em>: there is a one-parameter group (or family) of homeomorphisms $\varphi_t$ from $S^2 \times {\mathbb R}^2$ to itself such that $\varphi_T (\Sigma)$ is disjoint from $\Sigma$ for some (large) $T$. Indeed, just translate in the second variable far enough. </p> <p>However, it is impossible to displace the zero section of $TS^2$ because its self-intersection number is $2$. </p> <p>I read somewhere that to distinguish homeomorphism type of homotopic spaces one could look at the <em>homotopy</em> invariants of configuration spaces. I wonder :</p> <p>Is the homotopy type of the (two-point) configuration space $C_2(S^2 \times {\mathbb R}^2)$ different from that of $C_2(TS^2)?$.</p> <p><strong>Edit.</strong> It turns out that the answer to the preceeding question is <em>yes</em> as is nicely explained <a href="http://mathoverflow.net/questions/92406/" rel="nofollow">here</a> by Paolo Salvatore. This provides yet another way of proving that $S^2 \times {\mathbb R}^2$ and $TS^2$ are not homeomorphic.</p>