Square of a continuous map - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-22T20:52:46Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/92061http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/92061/square-of-a-continuous-mapSquare of a continuous mapjs2012-03-24T05:39:37Z2012-03-24T08:47:26Z
<p>Recently a student asked me the following (elementary looking) question :</p>
<p>If $T$ is an invertible linear transformation of some finite-dimensional space $E$ into itself which factorizes as $T = f \circ f $ where $f : E \mapsto E$ is <em>continuous</em>, must $T$ have positive determinant ?</p>
<p>Of course this is trivially true if $f$ is itself linear. It is also an easy exercise to show that this also holds when $f$ behaves locally like a linear transformation, that is, when it is $C^1$ : $T$ then factorizes as $T = df_{f(0)} \circ df_0 $, and since $x \mapsto \det df_x$ keeps a constant sign, we're done.</p>
<p>When $f$ is only continuous, this certainly still holds but I suspect this requires rather deep properties of continuous maps (unless I missed something obvious ...) with which I'm not very familiar. Hence two questions :</p>
<p>1) Is there an "elementary" proof of this ? (in which case I apologize for this question)</p>
<p>2) Does this property sound obvious to experts ? That is, is there some two-lines proof of this with a sufficient background ? If yes, what would be good references (books for example) to acquire this background ?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/92061/square-of-a-continuous-map/92062#92062Answer by Pietro Majer for Square of a continuous mapPietro Majer2012-03-24T06:38:28Z2012-03-24T08:47:26Z<p>The first relevant fact about $f$ is that it is a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proper_map" rel="nofollow">proper map</a>. In such a situation the topological (Brouwer) degree of $f$ is well-defined, and by the product rule $\operatorname{deg}(T)= \operatorname{deg}(f\circ f)= \operatorname{deg}(f) \operatorname{deg}(f)$. For an invertible linear transformation, the topological degree is the sign of the determinant, which proves your claim.</p>