Does regularity of the boundary imply interior sphere condition - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net 2013-06-19T03:37:47Z http://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/91604 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdf http://mathoverflow.net/questions/91604/does-regularity-of-the-boundary-imply-interior-sphere-condition Does regularity of the boundary imply interior sphere condition Beni Bogosel 2012-03-19T10:04:50Z 2012-03-20T16:45:00Z <p>In the article of Massari presented <a href="http://mathoverflow.net/questions/88507/inequality-involving-perimeter-and-area" rel="nofollow">here</a> there is a trace inequality which is said to be true for domains which satisfy the interior sphere condition: </p> <blockquote> <p>There exists $\rho>0$ such that for every $x \in \Omega$ there is a ball $B_\rho$ of radius $\rho$ such that $x \in B_\rho \subset \Omega$. This rhoughly means that the curvature of the domain is bounded from above.</p> </blockquote> <p>In some other article of Anzellotti and Giaquinta they prove a similar trace inequality for bounded domains with $C^1$ boundary. My question is: </p> <blockquote> <p>If a bounded open set $\Omega$ has $C^1$ boundary, is it true that it satisfies the interior sphere condition mentioned above?</p> </blockquote> <hr> <p> If the answer is negative for $C^1$ boundary, is it possible that for a $C^k$ with $k \geq 2$ or $C^\infty$ boundary the result becomes true?</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/91604/does-regularity-of-the-boundary-imply-interior-sphere-condition/91732#91732 Answer by Malte for Does regularity of the boundary imply interior sphere condition Malte 2012-03-20T16:12:01Z 2012-03-20T16:12:01Z <p>I think the remark on the curvature of the boundary of $\Omega$ might give some insight into this problem. Assume that $\Omega \subseteq \mathbb{R}^2$ has a $C^2$ boundary curve. Then its curvature is bounded from above by $\varepsilon > 0$. This implies that for any point of the curve, there is a osculating circle of radius $R \leq 1/\varepsilon$.</p> <p>The tube lemma should imply that there is some sort of $\delta$-collar around the boundary curve (using the normal bundle of the curve). Outside the $\delta$-collar, every point $x\in \Omega$ is contained in $B(x,\delta)$. After taking $\delta &lt; 1/\varepsilon$, inside the collar, every point is contained in an osculating circle of radius $\delta$.</p> <p>I assume this argument should work (after some refinement) for more complicated boundaries (say, if $\Omega$ is an annulus) and in higher dimensions using the Riemannian curvature.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/91604/does-regularity-of-the-boundary-imply-interior-sphere-condition/91735#91735 Answer by Deane Yang for Does regularity of the boundary imply interior sphere condition Deane Yang 2012-03-20T16:45:00Z 2012-03-20T16:45:00Z <p>Elaborating on Malte's answer, it's not the Riemann curvature that matters, it's the second fundamental form of the boundary and, specifically, the reciprocals of its eigenvalues, which are known as the principal radii.</p> <p>If the boundary is $C^2$, then given any point $x$ on the boundary, there is a positive lower bound $\rho$ for all of the principal radii for points on the boundary within distance $1$ of $x$. Then the ball of radius $\rho$ that is tangent to the boundary at $x$ is contained fully inside the domain.</p>