Which closed orientable $4$-dimensional manifolds cannot be embedded in $6$-space? - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-06-19T13:37:01Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/90872http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/90872/which-closed-orientable-4-dimensional-manifolds-cannot-be-embedded-in-6-spaceWhich closed orientable $4$-dimensional manifolds cannot be embedded in $6$-space?Scott Carter2012-03-11T03:06:36Z2012-03-11T04:11:31Z
<p>This question is a follow-up to <a href="http://mathoverflow.net/questions/90819/branched-coverings-of-the-4-sphere-branched-along-a-knotted-surface" rel="nofollow"> my previous question </a>. The statement of the question is the title. </p>
<p>Note that the $4$-dimensional real projective space is non-orientable and a characteristic class argument gives that it does not embed in $7$-space. Right now, I am more interested in orientable $4$-manifolds.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/90872/which-closed-orientable-4-dimensional-manifolds-cannot-be-embedded-in-6-space/90877#90877Answer by Igor Rivin for Which closed orientable $4$-dimensional manifolds cannot be embedded in $6$-space?Igor Rivin2012-03-11T03:54:24Z2012-03-11T04:11:31Z<p>This is true if and only if $X^4$ is spin and its signature vanishes. This is on p. 345 in Gompf/Stipsicz (4-manifolds and Kirby calculus), who cite Ruberman: Imbedding four-manifold and slicing links, 1982.</p>
<p><strong>EDIT</strong> Of course I mean that $X^4$ CAN be embedded in 6-dimensional space iff the conditions are met.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/90872/which-closed-orientable-4-dimensional-manifolds-cannot-be-embedded-in-6-space/90878#90878Answer by Mark Grant for Which closed orientable $4$-dimensional manifolds cannot be embedded in $6$-space?Mark Grant2012-03-11T03:56:14Z2012-03-11T03:56:14Z<p>$\mathbb{C}P^2$ does not embed in $\mathbb{R}^6$. See</p>
<p>Feder, S.; Segal, D. M.
<em>Immersions and embeddings of projective spaces,</em>
Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 35 (1972), 590–592. </p>