Module category equivalent to graded module category? - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net 2013-05-21T18:36:02Z http://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/85505 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdf http://mathoverflow.net/questions/85505/module-category-equivalent-to-graded-module-category Module category equivalent to graded module category? MTS 2012-01-12T17:02:09Z 2012-01-14T05:49:42Z <h2>Main Question</h2> <p>Let $R$ be a graded ring, graded by the nonnegative integers. Denote by $\mathrm{gr}R-\mathrm{Mod}$ the category of $\mathbb{Z}$-graded left $R$-modules with morphisms that preserve the grading. Is there a ring $S$ such that the category $S-\mathrm{Mod}$ of left $S$-modules is equivalent to $\mathrm{gr}R-\mathrm{Mod}$?</p> <p>As the category of graded $R$-modules is abelian, the Freyd-Mitchell theorem guarantees an exact embedding into a module category, but this is not necessarily an equivalence of categories, right?</p> <hr> <h2>Motivation</h2> <p>My motivation for the question is an offhand remark made to me indicating that for a given ring $A$, there is a ring $S$ such that the category of complexes of $A$-modules is equivalent to the category of $S$-modules. If you define the graded ring $R = A[t]/(t^2)$, graded by powers of $t$, then (I think) complexes of $A$-modules are equivalent to graded $R$-modules, so the question is reduced to the main question stated above.</p> <p>Of course, it could be the case that the answer to the original question I asked is negative, and yet the offhand remark is still true, in which case I would be interested in hearing about why that is.</p> <hr> <h3>Edit</h3> <p>I neglected to mention that I was hoping for a <em>unital</em> ring $S$ with <em>unital</em> modules. As several people have pointed out in the comments, this is not possible. I thought I would put up an argument to show why this is in case people come looking at this post in the future.</p> <p>Theorem 1 of Chapter 4, Section 11 of the book <em>Categories and Functors</em>, by Bodo Pareigis, gives a complete characterization of when an abelian category $\mathcal{C}$ is a module category. The criteria are that $\mathcal{C}$ must contain a progenerator (i.e. a finite, projective generator; I had to look that up) and it must contain arbitrary coproducts of that generator.</p> <p>Now let's see that $\mathrm{gr}R-\mathrm{Mod}$ cannot contain a finite progenerator. Take any finite (hence finitely generated) projective module $P = \bigoplus_{n \in \mathbb{Z}} P_n$. Since $P$ is finitely generated, there is some index $k_0$ such that $P_n = 0$ for $n <p>It is the fact that all components of $P$ below $k_0$ vanish that prevents $P$ from being a generator. For example, take the graded module $M$ such that $M_{k_0 -1} = R_0$ and all other $M_n = 0$. Since the only map from $P$ to $M$ is the zero map, morphisms from $P$ to $M$ cannot distinguish morphisms originating from $M$. Hence $P$ cannot be a generator.</p> <p>I accepted Mariano's answer because I felt it was the most elegant, but I learned something from all of the answers posted. Thanks everyone!</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/85505/module-category-equivalent-to-graded-module-category/85508#85508 Answer by Fernando Muro for Module category equivalent to graded module category? Fernando Muro 2012-01-12T17:56:27Z 2012-01-12T17:56:27Z <p>The answer is yes. Let $T'$ be the path $\mathbb{Z}$-algebra of the Quiver</p> <p>$$\cdots\rightarrow n-1\rightarrow n \rightarrow n+1 \rightarrow\cdots$$</p> <p>This $\mathbb{Z}$-algebra is defined by generators $\{a_n,b_n\}_{n\in\mathbb{Z}}$, where $a_n$ is morally the $n^{\text{th}}$ vertex of the quiver, and $b_n$ is the morphism $n\rightarrow n+1$. The derining relations are</p> <p>$$a_n^2=a_n,\qquad b_na_n=b_n, \qquad a_{n+1}b_n=a_n,\qquad a_ma_n=0\;\text{ if }\;m\neq n.$$</p> <p>A right $R\otimes T'$-module $M$ is the same as a diagram of $R$-modules</p> <p>$$\cdots\rightarrow M_{n-1}\rightarrow M_n \rightarrow M_{n+1} \rightarrow\cdots$$</p> <p>The correspondence is given by $M_n=a_nM$, and $M_n \rightarrow M_{n+1}$ is left multiplication by $b_n$.</p> <p>Since you want complexes, let $T$ be the quotient of $T'$ by the additional relations</p> <p>$$b_{n+1}b_n=0.$$</p> <p>Right $R\otimes T$-modules are complexes of $R$-modules.</p> <p>You may dislike that $T'$, $R\otimes T'$, $T$ and $R\otimes T$ don't have a unit. But this is easy to solve. Just take the <a href="http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/unitalization" rel="nofollow">unitalization</a> of these rings ($\mathbb{Z}$-algebras) and unital modules over them.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/85505/module-category-equivalent-to-graded-module-category/85515#85515 Answer by Mariano Suárez-Alvarez for Module category equivalent to graded module category? Mariano Suárez-Alvarez 2012-01-12T18:44:03Z 2012-01-13T20:41:26Z <p>$\newcommand\ZZ{\mathbb{Z}}$Let $R=\bigoplus_{n\in\mathbb N_0}R_n$ be your graded ring. Construct a category $Q$ with objects $\ZZ$ and where $\hom_Q(n,m)=R_{m-n}$ with composition coming from the multiplication in $R$. A graded left $R$-module is the same thing as a functor from $Q$ to abelian groups. The (non-unital) ring associated to $Q$ does what you want.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/85505/module-category-equivalent-to-graded-module-category/85521#85521 Answer by Neil Strickland for Module category equivalent to graded module category? Neil Strickland 2012-01-12T19:53:56Z 2012-01-12T19:53:56Z <p>This answer is just an elaboration of Moosbrugger's comment.</p> <p>For simplicity, assume that $R$ is just a field $k$ concentrated in degree zero. Put $S=\text{Map}(\mathbb{Z},k)$, and let $e_n\in S$ be the obvious idempotent supported at $n$. For any $S$-module $M$ we can put $(FM)_n=M/((1-e_n)M)$; this gives a functor <code>$F:\text{Mod}_S\to\text{GrMod}_R$</code>. Some comments above suggest that this should be an equivalence, but it is not. To see this, let $J\leq S$ be the ideal of finitely-supported functions. It is then easy to see that $S/J\neq0$ but $F(S/J)=0$. This is the point behind Moosbrugger's remark about topologies. Suppose we give $S$ the product topology, and consider only modules $M$ such that the action map $S\times M\to M$ is continuous with respect to the discrete topology. I think this just means that for all $m\in M$ there is a finite set $K$ such that $m=\sum_{k\in K}e_km$. Using this we find that $M\simeq\bigoplus_{n\in\mathbb{Z}}(FM)_n$, and thus that $F$ gives an equivalence from the continuous module category to $\text{GrMod}_R$.</p>