'Important' applications of p-adic numbers outside of algebra (and number theory). - MathOverflow

'Important' applications of p-adic numbers outside of algebra (and number theory).

2011-12-26T16:17:53Z

Surely, $\mathbb{Z}_p$ and $\mathbb{Q}_p$ (and their extensions) are very important for algebra and number theory. Do they have any important applications outside of algebra (that I could easily explain to a student)? Here I do not demand the applications to be (purely) 'mathematical'; for example, I wonder whether p-adic numbers have applications to physics (outside of string theory?). Moreover, I am also interested in those applications that are partially 'algebraic', and yet important for some other parts of mathematics.

Answer by Igor Rivin for 'Important' applications of p-adic numbers outside of algebra (and number theory).

2011-12-26T17:06:39Z

Googling "applied p-adic analysis" returns obviously interesting results.

Answer by Anatoly Kochubei for 'Important' applications of p-adic numbers outside of algebra (and number theory).

2011-12-26T17:13:34Z

See the survey paper "On p-adic mathematical physics", by B. Dragovich, A. Yu. Khrennikov, S. V. Kozyrev and I. V. Volovich: http://www.springerlink.com/content/j16m84014r878034/

Answer by David Feldman for 'Important' applications of p-adic numbers outside of algebra (and number theory).

2011-12-26T17:14:52Z

This article contains many references,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-adic_quantum_mechanics

though I don't know how many will count as "outside of string theory."

Answer by Maurizio Monge for 'Important' applications of p-adic numbers outside of algebra (and number theory).

2011-12-26T17:55:19Z

The (unsolved) Hilbert-Smith conjecture states that any locally compact group acting faithfully on a manifold has to be a Lie group: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert%E2%80%93Smith_conjecture

However, it turns out that it is enough to prove this for $\mathbb{Z}_p$, and the conjecture follows proving that $\mathbb{Z}_p$ has no continuous faithful action on a manifold.

Answer by Alain Valette for 'Important' applications of p-adic numbers outside of algebra (and number theory).

2011-12-26T20:06:12Z

There is a journal devoted to p-adic numbers, p-adic analysis and applications: http://www.springer.com/mathematics/algebra/journal/12607

You can also google "spin glasses + p-adic numbers"

Answer by Joe Silverman for 'Important' applications of p-adic numbers outside of algebra (and number theory).

2011-12-26T20:18:14Z

This won't qualify as something you can explain to undergraduate students, but non-archimedean dynamics has recently seen a number of applications to classical complex dynamics. (Non-archimedean is dynamics over a field with a non-archimedean absolute value, but not specifically an extension of $\mathbb{Q}_p$.) I'll mention one beautiful example, which is a recent theorem of Matt Baker and Laura DeMarco. Let $$f_c(x) = x^2+c$$ be the usual quadratic polynomial, and for any starting value $a$, let $O_c(a)$ be the forward orbit of $a$ for the map $f_c$. That is, $$O_c(a) = \{a,f_c(a),f_c^2(a),f_c^3(a),...\}$$ where $f_c^n$ denotes the $n$'th iterate of $f_c$.

Theorem: Let $a$ and $b$ be complex numbers with $a^2\ne b^2$. Then $$\{c\in\mathbb{C} : O_c(a) \text{ and } O_c(b) \text{ are both finite}\}$$ is a finite set.

The proof is partly complex dynamics, partly equidistribution theorems (in both the complex and $p$-adic settings), and partly a reduction step in which one works in Berkovich space over a non-archimedean field. Note that the statement of the theorem is purely a statement about complex numbers, but the proof requires non-trivial methods from non-archimedean analysis.

Answer by Joe Silverman for 'Important' applications of p-adic numbers outside of algebra (and number theory).

2011-12-26T20:23:14Z

At a somewhat speculative level, you might look at the work of Andrei Khrennikov:

http://w3.msi.vxu.se/Personer/akhmasda/home.html

In particular, his home page mentions his work on:

dynamical systems over $p$-adic fields with applications for describing the process of thinking: "the system conscious- subconscious as a p-adic dynamical processor."
$p$-adic dynamical systems for social sciences.

Answer by Paul Broussous for 'Important' applications of p-adic numbers outside of algebra (and number theory).

2011-12-26T20:44:51Z

I am not convinced by the applications of $p$-adic numbers (or adèles) to theoretical physics, even though I am not a physicist. I think p-adic mathematical physics has so far nothing to do with real phenomena. But of course $p$-adic analysis is useful in mathematics. $p$-adic analysis has for instance natural applications in the $p$-adic Langlands program. The basic idea of that program is to replace the field $\mathbb C$ by a $p$-adic field when considering linear representations (of a $p$-adic Lie group or a Galois group).

There are obvious applications of $p$-adic numbers and adèles to analytic number theory via the (classical) Langlands program. These applications are not only algebraic, since they may for instance predict the analytic behaviour of $L$-functions.

Another interesting example is the existence of a nice locally compact topology, defined by Berkovich, on $p$-adic rigid manifolds (varieties over ${\mathbb C}_p$, the completion of the algebraic closure of ${\mathbb Q}_p$). You get in such a way varieties analogous to complex varieties. You can do very similar things like dynamics, dessins d'enfant, potential theory, integration of $1$-forms, ... The following survey articles by Ducros (for french readers) are excellent:

Géométrie analytique $p$-adique : la théorie de Berkovich, Gazette des Mathématiciens 111 (2007), 12-27.

Espaces analytiques $p$-adiques au sens de Berkovich, exposé 958 du Séminaire Bourbaki (mars 2006).

This is a very promissing theory.

Answer by Sean Tilson for 'Important' applications of p-adic numbers outside of algebra (and number theory).

2011-12-26T22:07:57Z

The $p$-adics come up in homotopy theory. The main reason is because of their usefulness in the theory of formal group laws.

They are also relevant in certain parts of algebraic geometry, they are (one of) the first examples of completions.

References:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_group#Lubin.E2.80.93Tate_formal_group_laws

http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.0119

http://arxiv.org/abs/0802.0996

The last one is supposed to tie in the others. Of course, this is all stuff that happened after Quillen's theorem and the work of many other people, such as Mike Hopkins, Jack Morava, Haynes Miller, Doug Ravenel, and Steve Wilson.